London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 3rd 07, 01:11 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 529
Default Southern's 13 Power Box Scheme

On Apr 3, 2:11 am, "MaxB" wrote:

wrote in message
ups.com...I know the SR had a plan in the 70's to have 13 PSB's for the whole
region can anyone shed some light, plan did not happen as such.



I don't know if it was ever finished, but London Bridge, Victoria (Clapham
Jn) and Ashford were all part of it.



I agree it certainly started but was not finished.

The Central Division (mainly) boxes LB, VA, Three Bridges were
certainly three of them - but I think that was it.

I am not so sure Ashford was one - maybe if so it would have been much
extended. ISTR Ashford was older, resignalled under Kent Coast Phase
II, and like Eastleigh and Basingstoke and other 1960s boxes pre-dated
the 13 box scheme, and replaced by a new one/s or the equipment/s
supplanted. Then what went into Ashford was - by the time it was done
- was no longer part of the 13 box scheme.

I'm wondering if Dartford was one of them, not sure. OTH, I'm pretty
sure Feltham was not. Or again, both of these might have been
locations for extension or upgrade into the 13 box plan.

Waterloo would also have been one of them - but was deferred delayed
and generally procrastinated over by which time the idea had moved on,
and SR as in the region had more or less gone by the time it was under
way.



I'd be interested if anyone can dig out some detailed plans of the 13
box scheme to see how it compares with todays railway.

--
Nick

  #2   Report Post  
Old April 3rd 07, 01:18 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,029
Default Southern's 13 Power Box Scheme


"D7666" wrote in message
oups.com...

I agree it certainly started but was not finished.

The Central Division (mainly) boxes LB, VA, Three Bridges were
certainly three of them - but I think that was it.

I am not so sure Ashford was one - maybe if so it would have been much
extended. ISTR Ashford was older, resignalled under Kent Coast Phase
II, and like Eastleigh and Basingstoke and other 1960s boxes pre-dated
the 13 box scheme, and replaced by a new one/s or the equipment/s
supplanted. Then what went into Ashford was - by the time it was done
- was no longer part of the 13 box scheme.

I'm wondering if Dartford was one of them, not sure. OTH, I'm pretty
sure Feltham was not. Or again, both of these might have been
locations for extension or upgrade into the 13 box plan.

Waterloo would also have been one of them - but was deferred delayed
and generally procrastinated over by which time the idea had moved on,
and SR as in the region had more or less gone by the time it was under
way.

I'd be interested if anyone can dig out some detailed plans of the 13
box scheme to see how it compares with todays railway.


I wonder if there will ever be any major Area Signalling Centres developed
in the south, cf Rugby? Or will there only be piecemeal improvements like
Portsmouth (new Havant SC) and the current Basingstoke works...

Paul


  #3   Report Post  
Old April 3rd 07, 02:10 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2004
Posts: 64
Default Southern's 13 Power Box Scheme


"D7666" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Apr 3, 2:11 am, "MaxB" wrote:

wrote in message
ups.com...I know the
SR had a plan in the 70's to have 13 PSB's for the whole
region can anyone shed some light, plan did not happen as such.



I don't know if it was ever finished, but London Bridge, Victoria
(Clapham
Jn) and Ashford were all part of it.



I agree it certainly started but was not finished.

The Central Division (mainly) boxes LB, VA, Three Bridges were
certainly three of them - but I think that was it.

I am not so sure Ashford was one - maybe if so it would have been much
extended. ISTR Ashford was older, resignalled under Kent Coast Phase
II, and like Eastleigh and Basingstoke and other 1960s boxes pre-dated
the 13 box scheme, and replaced by a new one/s or the equipment/s
supplanted. Then what went into Ashford was - by the time it was done
- was no longer part of the 13 box scheme.

I'm wondering if Dartford was one of them, not sure. OTH, I'm pretty
sure Feltham was not. Or again, both of these might have been
locations for extension or upgrade into the 13 box plan.

Waterloo would also have been one of them - but was deferred delayed
and generally procrastinated over by which time the idea had moved on,
and SR as in the region had more or less gone by the time it was under
way.



I'd be interested if anyone can dig out some detailed plans of the 13
box scheme to see how it compares with todays railway.

--
Nick

'Waterloo' eventually became 'Wimbledon'. Dartford was resignalled, but
instead of the part-completed (built, but not kitted-out) box at Gillingham
being used, it went into some of the under-used acres of Ashford IECC. In
terms of passenger-miles, the majority of the former Southern Region is
probably controlled by about a dozen or so control centres.
Brian


  #4   Report Post  
Old April 3rd 07, 04:46 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 529
Default Southern's 13 Power Box Scheme

On Apr 3, 6:10 am, "BH Williams" wrote:

'Waterloo' eventually became 'Wimbledon'. Dartford was resignalled, but
instead of the part-completed (built, but not kitted-out) box at Gillingham
being used, it went into some of the under-used acres of Ashford IECC.


This is the sort of thing I was thinking of - the BR SR 13 plan for
Ashford was not the same as the new Ashford that is today,

In
terms of passenger-miles, the majority of the former Southern Region is
probably controlled by about a dozen or so control centres.


Yes and no - there are approaching that number of large panel/IECC
boxes
Waterloo/Wimbledon
Feltham
Woking
Basingstoke
Eastleigh
Portsmouth (haha)
Victoria
Three Bridges
London Bridge
Dartford
Ashford
= 11,
but the point about the SR 13 is they would have eliminated *all*
other boxes, and clearly there are still a large number of those all
over the present southern zone. So today instead of 13 large area
boxes and nothing else, we appear to have 11 larg-ish area boxes plus
quite a lot of other installations, some of which looking as if they
will run on for ever.

--
Nick



  #5   Report Post  
Old April 3rd 07, 04:59 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 5
Default Southern's 13 Power Box Scheme


"D7666" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Apr 3, 6:10 am, "BH Williams" wrote:

'Waterloo' eventually became 'Wimbledon'. Dartford was resignalled, but
instead of the part-completed (built, but not kitted-out) box at
Gillingham
being used, it went into some of the under-used acres of Ashford IECC.


This is the sort of thing I was thinking of - the BR SR 13 plan for
Ashford was not the same as the new Ashford that is today,

In
terms of passenger-miles, the majority of the former Southern Region is
probably controlled by about a dozen or so control centres.


Yes and no - there are approaching that number of large panel/IECC
boxes
Waterloo/Wimbledon
Feltham
Woking
Basingstoke
Eastleigh
Portsmouth (haha)
Victoria
Three Bridges
London Bridge
Dartford
Ashford
= 11,
but the point about the SR 13 is they would have eliminated *all*
other boxes, and clearly there are still a large number of those all
over the present southern zone. So today instead of 13 large area
boxes and nothing else, we appear to have 11 larg-ish area boxes plus
quite a lot of other installations, some of which looking as if they
will run on for ever.

--
Nick


Arundel was being mentioned recently as being upgraded to a power box but I
think it will be at Barnham now.




  #6   Report Post  
Old April 3rd 07, 05:05 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 529
Default Southern's 13 Power Box Scheme

On Apr 3, 8:59 am, "8sub" wrote:

over the present southern zone. So today instead of 13 large area
boxes and nothing else, we appear to have 11 larg-ish area boxes plus
quite a lot of other installations, some of which looking as if they
will run on for ever.


Arundel was being mentioned recently as being upgraded to a power box but I
think it will be at Barnham now.


Yep, but still nothing on the scale of the large 13 area boxes. For
example Salisbury is also a panel - and has been since c.1980 - but
was neither one of the SR 13 nor is it anywhere near as large.

--
Nick



  #7   Report Post  
Old April 3rd 07, 06:18 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2004
Posts: 64
Default Southern's 13 Power Box Scheme


"D7666" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Apr 3, 6:10 am, "BH Williams" wrote:

'Waterloo' eventually became 'Wimbledon'. Dartford was resignalled, but
instead of the part-completed (built, but not kitted-out) box at
Gillingham
being used, it went into some of the under-used acres of Ashford IECC.


This is the sort of thing I was thinking of - the BR SR 13 plan for
Ashford was not the same as the new Ashford that is today,

In
terms of passenger-miles, the majority of the former Southern Region is
probably controlled by about a dozen or so control centres.


Yes and no - there are approaching that number of large panel/IECC
boxes
Waterloo/Wimbledon
Feltham
Woking
Basingstoke
Eastleigh
Portsmouth (haha)
Victoria
Three Bridges
London Bridge
Dartford
Ashford
= 11,
but the point about the SR 13 is they would have eliminated *all*
other boxes, and clearly there are still a large number of those all
over the present southern zone. So today instead of 13 large area
boxes and nothing else, we appear to have 11 larg-ish area boxes plus
quite a lot of other installations, some of which looking as if they
will run on for ever.

--
Nick



'Dartford' is a workstation at Ashford IECC, as is the CTRL .
Brian


  #8   Report Post  
Old April 3rd 07, 06:52 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 529
Default Southern's 13 Power Box Scheme

On Apr 3, 10:18 am, "BH Williams" wrote:


'Dartford' is a workstation at Ashford IECC, as is the CTRL .
Brian


I did not know that abotu Dartford, although I did about CTRl.

When did Dartford PSB close ?


--
Nick


  #9   Report Post  
Old April 3rd 07, 08:20 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2004
Posts: 64
Default Southern's 13 Power Box Scheme


"D7666" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Apr 3, 10:18 am, "BH Williams" wrote:


'Dartford' is a workstation at Ashford IECC, as is the CTRL .
Brian


I did not know that abotu Dartford, although I did about CTRl.

When did Dartford PSB close ?


--
Nick


Did it ever open? I thought the 'box was the one at Gillingham, by the
depot- this was never fitted out, as the IECC at Ashford had sufficent
capacity to accomodate the functions.The North Kent signals do still bear
the NK prefix, however. Even now, with all the other bits added on to the
original SER mainline, there still seems to be space at Ashford for more.
Brian


  #10   Report Post  
Old April 3rd 07, 09:47 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 4
Default Southern's 13 Power Box Scheme


"BH Williams" wrote in message
...

"D7666" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Apr 3, 10:18 am, "BH Williams" wrote:


'Dartford' is a workstation at Ashford IECC, as is the CTRL .
Brian


I did not know that abotu Dartford, although I did about CTRl.

When did Dartford PSB close ?


--
Nick


Did it ever open? I thought the 'box was the one at Gillingham, by the
depot- this was never fitted out, as the IECC at Ashford had sufficent
capacity to accomodate the functions.The North Kent signals do still bear
the NK prefix, however. Even now, with all the other bits added on to the
original SER mainline, there still seems to be space at Ashford for more.
Brian

How is the Kent Coast line signalled?

TIA




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Box Signal Box and Junction Road Junction Basil Jet London Transport 0 August 6th 09 02:14 AM
Southern keen to run pilot Oyster scheme Ian F. London Transport 4 February 18th 06 12:13 PM
Thameslink 'BOX' Malcolm & Nika London Transport 4 May 17th 05 07:01 PM
Box Junction Victory? RayB London Transport 1 November 24th 04 04:36 AM
Box Junction Penalty Robin Smith London Transport 72 September 1st 03 09:59 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017