Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Was in Oxford Street today, of which about half is currently closed to
all traffic due to a fire in the shop next to M&S (I forget what it was called). I couldn't help but notice that it was far more pleasant - less crowded and pretty much unpolluted - compared with its usual bus- and taxi-filled anarchy. I would as such consider that there is a serious case for pedestrianisation, with buses serving passengers either on all the crossing streets or perhaps on a specially-built bus station or similar somewhere around the middle. There are plenty of parallel streets that can take the through traffic. What are peoples' thoughts on this? Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28 Apr, 22:21, (Neil Williams)
wrote: Was in Oxford Street today, of which about half is currently closed to all traffic due to a fire in the shop next to M&S (I forget what it was called). I couldn't help but notice that it was far more pleasant - less crowded and pretty much unpolluted - compared with its usual bus- and taxi-filled anarchy. I would as such consider that there is a serious case for pedestrianisation, with buses serving passengers either on all the crossing streets or perhaps on a specially-built bus station or similar somewhere around the middle. There are plenty of parallel streets that can take the through traffic. What are peoples' thoughts on this? Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. Even if there are plenty of parallel streets which could take the bus traffic, that doesn't seem to be where it was going. While some of the routes turned around at Tottenham Court Road (e.g. 25), there were others (7, 8, 73) which appeared to be diverted via Regent Street, Piccadilly and Shaftsbury Avenue rather than to the north of Oxford Street. There were lots of "short" destinations on the front of buses so traffic must have been bad. However, I agree that Oxford Street isn't really the right place to run a lot of the services that use it. On a Saturday, I reckon that a journey from Aldwych to Paddington might sometimes be quicker using 11/36-436 via Victoria or 9/36-436 via Hyde Park than by taking the 15 or 23. There is some virtue in the idea of the Oxford Street / Regent Street tram but I don't think the travelling public would necessary buy having to change. Jonathan |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 09:21:06PM +0000, Neil Williams wrote:
I would as such consider that there is a serious case for pedestrianisation, with buses serving passengers either on all the crossing streets or perhaps on a specially-built bus station or similar somewhere around the middle. There are plenty of parallel streets that can take the through traffic. Most of those parallel streets are quite small, with tight corners at the intersections. They certainly can't take bendy buses and might have trouble with proper buses too. Most cabs already use the parallel streets unless they going to or from an address on Oxford St itself. I travel on one of the larger parallel streets - Shaftesbury Avenue - and the closure of Oxford St meant that it, Regent St, Piccadilly Circus, part of Piccadilly, and Charing Cross Road plus probably some other stuff that I didn't see, were moving *very* slowly. -- David Cantrell | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david I apologize if I offended you personally, I intended to do it professionally. -- Steve Champeon, on the nanog list |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
I couldn't help but notice that it was far more pleasant - less crowded and pretty much unpolluted - compared with its usual bus- and taxi-filled anarchy. I would as such consider that there is a serious case for pedestrianisation, with buses serving passengers either on all the crossing streets or perhaps on a specially-built bus station or similar somewhere around the middle. There are plenty of parallel streets that can take the through traffic. What are peoples' thoughts on this? I'm in complete agreement. I remember much of Oxford St being closed for roadworks one night a while ago, and i cycled along it (the odd row of cones not being much of an impediment to a bike) - it was wonderful. The pedestrianisation of Oxford Street has been much discussed; the main idea seems to be to split bus routes using it in two (terminating at new bus stations at Marble Arch and St Giles's Circus, i suppose), rather than rerouting them. The tram also features heavily in this - it's the only practical way of moving people rapidly along the street, and shuttling people between the bus stations, given the pedestrianisation. I do wonder if there's room undeneath the roadway for either a huge long road underpass, or a very shallow subsurface tram or underground line. The Central line is presumably rather deeper, and although there will be pipes and cables and things, dealing with these is a matter of detail (admittedly a very expensive one) rather than a showstopper. The other thing that needs be done is sinking the Marble Arch gyratory, so there's continuous pedestrian access between Hyde Park, the arch, and Oxford Street. Again, perhaps possible, but exorbitantly expensive. tom -- People don't want nice. People want London. -- Al |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Anderson" wrote in message h.li... I do wonder if there's room undeneath the roadway for either a huge long road underpass, or a very shallow subsurface tram or underground line. The Central line is presumably rather deeper, and although there will be pipes and cables and things, dealing with these is a matter of detail (admittedly a very expensive one) rather than a showstopper. Although the entrances are often in the ground floor of buildings, aren't all the underground station ticket halls immediately below the road surface? - relocating those seems rather more than a matter of detail, I reckon... Paul |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Paul Scott wrote:
"Tom Anderson" wrote in message h.li... I do wonder if there's room undeneath the roadway for either a huge long road underpass, or a very shallow subsurface tram or underground line. The Central line is presumably rather deeper, and although there will be pipes and cables and things, dealing with these is a matter of detail (admittedly a very expensive one) rather than a showstopper. Although the entrances are often in the ground floor of buildings, aren't all the underground station ticket halls immediately below the road surface? - relocating those seems rather more than a matter of detail, I reckon... Curses, foiled again! tom -- That's the problem with google. You can usually find what you're looking for with a fairly simple search. It's knowing *which* fairly simple search out of the millions of possible fairly simple searches you need to use to find it ;-) -- Paul D |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:49:09PM +0100, Tom Anderson wrote:
The pedestrianisation of Oxford Street has been much discussed; the main idea seems to be to split bus routes using it in two (terminating at new bus stations at Marble Arch and St Giles's Circus, i suppose) The St Giles's Circus one would have to be something other than what's already there at Tottenham Court Road and at the back of Centre Point. At certain times of day that all slows down because buses coming out from under Centre Point have to merge into traffic going westbound along New Oxford St, or cross that traffic to go east. The routes crossing each other could perhaps be done away with if all westbound traffic were to dogleg south and west around Centre Point before turning north or south along Charing Cross Road, and anything eastbound were to go west onto Charing Cross Road, north to the junction, then east along New Oxford St (this assumes nothing's coming out of Oxford St). Trouble is, there's not a lot of room around the back of Centre Point for several buses on different routes to stop and then move around each other, so you'll end up with a long queue of buses waiting to get into the station just like sometimes happens at Victoria, where Terminus Place being full will prevent any buses going into the bus station itself, despite the bus station being empty. Also there's not a great deal of space for the huge area that a bendy bus needs to turn in. -- David Cantrell | Reality Engineer, Ministry of Information If you have received this email in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites, whisk, and place in a warm oven for 40 minutes. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Whose daft idea was it to close Oxford Street today? | London Transport | |||
Unenforced traffic ban on oxford street | London Transport | |||
Unenforced traffic ban on oxford street | London Transport | |||
Private Routemaster Shopping Bus on Oxford Street? | London Transport | |||
Massive Oxford Street Traffic Jam Saturday 28 Feb ? | London Transport |