On 23 May, 18:00, " wrote:
On 23 May, 11:35, Tom Anderson wrote:

So it's sort of functionally one station, but split into two because of
the practicalities. Interesting.

I suspect that London has the odd example of the exact opposite?
(Functionally two stations, but both identically named despite
affording less than ideal interchange facilities.)

--
gordon

Apologies for this message originally being posted in multiple. Each
time an error box came up telling me that my message had not been
posted. Subsequently discovered that the system had been lying through
its teeth!

--
gordon