Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 21 Jun, 09:09, Kev wrote:
On Jun 21, 8:17 am, Sam wrote: On 20 Jun, 11:04, Kev wrote: I need to visit the New Southgate/Bowes Park area and then go the the Kings Cross area. I had to do a very similar journey to this last year. On the advice of people in this group, I parked on street (for free) very close to New Southgate mainline rail station (not the Tube station). You can then get the train from there direct to King's Cross or Moorgate (or change onto the Picc at Finsbury Park if you prefer). Good point but I guess the Victoria for Kings Cross at Finsbury Park would be a better bet. I don't suppose oystercards are valid at New Southgate though. Yes - Victoria would definitely be quicker, although it may also be busier. PAYG Oyster isn't valid at New Southgate yet - see the map here : http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloa...YG-Diagram.pdf If you're travelling Off-Peak and you have a Network Railcard, it's often cheaper to buy a One-Day Travelcard than use PAYG Oyster, even with the daily capping. Sam |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 05:11:37 -0700, Sam wrote:
If you're travelling Off-Peak and you have a Network Railcard, it's often cheaper to buy a One-Day Travelcard than use PAYG Oyster, even with the daily capping. Only at weekends - the £10 weekday minimum fare prevents you from buying a Z1-6 ODTC during the week. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 21 Jun, 13:11, Sam wrote:
Yes - Victoria would definitely be quicker, although it may also be busier. PAYG Oyster isn't valid at New Southgate yet - see the map here :http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloa...YG-Diagram.pdf There seem to be a number of routes where you can legally ride with PAYG but stations on those routes where it seems you can't legally get on or off! Where the hell is the logic in that? B2003 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 21, 4:17 pm, Boltar wrote:
There seem to be a number of routes where you can legally ride with PAYG but stations on those routes where it seems you can't legally get on or off! Where the hell is the logic in that? Gating, probably. On 'one', for example, you could travel between Seven Sisters & Liverpool Street - both of which are gated, but not get out at the intermediate stops - which are not gated. PAYG can't work without oyster readers. Existing gates had to be upgraded to Oyster to allow Oyster travelcards to continue to work - as were gatelines which were shared LUL /national rail, but installing entirely new equipment is another matter... -- Abi |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:29:03 -0000, Abigail Brady wrote:
There seem to be a number of routes where you can legally ride with PAYG but stations on those routes where it seems you can't legally get on or off! Where the hell is the logic in that? Gating, probably. On 'one', for example, you could travel between Seven Sisters & Liverpool Street - both of which are gated, but not get out at the intermediate stops - which are not gated. PAYG can't work without oyster readers. Existing gates had to be upgraded to Oyster to allow Oyster travelcards to continue to work - as were gatelines which were shared LUL /national rail, but installing entirely new equipment is another matter... It's nothing to do with that. It's because the TOCs don't want to allow PAYG, except where forced to by ticket interavailability agreements. Equipment could easily be installed if 'one' allowed it (see City Thameslink, Drayton Park, Essex Road). IIRC Ken offered to pay for Oyster equipment at every station in Z1-6, but the TOCs still refused. So, for example, you can't use PAYG on NR for a journey from Greenford to Ealing Broadway, even though both stations have gates and Oyster readers (which are even PAYG-enabled). |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 21, 5:59 pm, asdf wrote:
It's nothing to do with that. It's because the TOCs don't want to allow PAYG, except where forced to by ticket interavailability agreements. Equipment could easily be installed if 'one' allowed it (see City Thameslink, Drayton Park, Essex Road). IIRC Ken offered to pay for Oyster equipment at every station in Z1-6, but the TOCs still refused. Seems pretty daft. Its not as if they're going to lose money from it, probably the opposite. Bloody minded sods. Bring back BR. B2003 |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:14:43 -0700, Boltar
wrote: On Jun 21, 5:59 pm, asdf wrote: It's nothing to do with that. It's because the TOCs don't want to allow PAYG, except where forced to by ticket interavailability agreements. Equipment could easily be installed if 'one' allowed it (see City Thameslink, Drayton Park, Essex Road). IIRC Ken offered to pay for Oyster equipment at every station in Z1-6, but the TOCs still refused. Seems pretty daft. Its not as if they're going to lose money from it, probably the opposite. Bloody minded sods. Bring back BR. Actually the TOCs crumpled into line at the last minute although I suspect there are rumblings still going in the background about the detail of how it work and who pays what. I am not at all convinced that BR would have been any more accommodating about increasing the extent of interavailability and the associated acceptance of PAYG. BR had even worse financial pressures than most TOCs and were not at all happy with nasty inventions like Travelcards and Capitalcards. The thought of smartcards and ticket gates and fancy electronic fares was always for "someone else" and not them. At least a proportion of the TOCs (Southern, SWT, FCC, C2C, One) can readily see the advantages the technology will bring. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Boltar wrote:
On 21 Jun, 13:11, Sam wrote: Yes - Victoria would definitely be quicker, although it may also be busier. PAYG Oyster isn't valid at New Southgate yet - see the map here :http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloa...YG-Diagram.pdf There seem to be a number of routes where you can legally ride with PAYG but stations on those routes where it seems you can't legally get on or off! Where the hell is the logic in that? I think it's the same as where there are interavailable LU/NR tickets. The West Anglia line is the classic case, where you can go from Walthamstow (which is on the Victoria line) to Liverpool Street (on various lines), but can't get off in between. Back in the days of LT cards, it was also the case that you could use one from Walthamstow to Liverpool Street, but not from intermediate stations. I lived in Clapton, got a student discounted LT card, and was quite grumpy about this. Well, actually, i just got on the train and hoped i wouldn't get my ticket checked. I only got caught once before they switched student tickets to real travelcards. tom -- SCIIIIEEEEEENNNNNCNCCCCCE!!! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Arnos Grove exhibition | London Transport | |||
Anyone have an ETA on the picc re-opening south of arnos grove? | London Transport | |||
Arnos Grove | London Transport | |||
Arnos Grove | London Transport | |||
Bounds Green to Heathrow | London Transport |