Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why do the authorities feel it necessary to seal off such a large area when
they have already made the bomb safe and removed the explosive material? Someone said that it was so the police could forensically search the area for stuff the suspect might have dropped. However there have been no teams of police on hands and knees conducting fingertip searches or anything like that. Or is it not really needed at all and its just to make a statement to the public about how serious it could have been? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"MichaelJP" wrote in message
Why do the authorities feel it necessary to seal off such a large area when they have already made the bomb safe and removed the explosive material? Someone said that it was so the police could forensically search the area for stuff the suspect might have dropped. However there have been no teams of police on hands and knees conducting fingertip searches or anything like that. Or is it not really needed at all and its just to make a statement to the public about how serious it could have been? Perhaps they want to make sure there aren't any more bombs in the area? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Recliner" wrote in message
... "MichaelJP" wrote in message Why do the authorities feel it necessary to seal off such a large area when they have already made the bomb safe and removed the explosive material? Someone said that it was so the police could forensically search the area for stuff the suspect might have dropped. However there have been no teams of police on hands and knees conducting fingertip searches or anything like that. Or is it not really needed at all and its just to make a statement to the public about how serious it could have been? Perhaps they want to make sure there aren't any more bombs in the area? If that's really the case then they should close all of central London. There is no particular reason that another bomb should be within 200 yards of the Mercedes. A typical Al Quaeda plot would involve multiple bombs, but spread over several miles. Its almost as though the response is calibrated according to the seriousness of what could have happened if the bomb had exploded, rather than the real situation on the ground. Maybe they hope to get a better response from the public that way. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MichaelJP wrote:
Why do the authorities feel it necessary to seal off such a large area when they have already made the bomb safe and removed the explosive material? What area is sealed off? The RAC traffic report seems to indicate that it's just the southbound route from Piccadilly Circus to Trafalgar Square via Haymarket that is closed, and the BBC has reported that Piccadilly Circus tube station has reopened. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 3:17 pm, wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:00:44 +0100, "MichaelJP" wrote: Its almost as though the response is calibrated according to the seriousness of what could have happened if the bomb had exploded, rather than the real situation on the ground. Maybe they hope to get a better response from the public that way. The point is though no matter the situation or where the police are being paid a very large amount of money for doing the job they do so why are they are for ever asking the pubic to help them . Seems to me all they are good for is catching speeding motorists, police on foot would I am sure would have spotted that car but no they would sooner sit in their cars and let Joe Public do their job for them . Translation please Peter |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"MichaelJP" wrote in
: If that's really the case then they should close all of central London. There is no particular reason that another bomb should be within 200 yards of the Mercedes. A typical Al Quaeda plot would involve multiple bombs, but spread over several miles. And it turns out the second bomb WAS within 200 yards. Sitting down in Cockspur Street, probably an area where people would have been evacuated to had the first one gone off. Except that they'd parked it illegally and it had been towed to just off Park Lane. Iain |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 9:54 pm, Iain wrote:
"MichaelJP" wrote : If that's really the case then they should close all of central London. There is no particular reason that another bomb should be within 200 yards of the Mercedes. A typical Al Quaeda plot would involve multiple bombs, but spread over several miles. And it turns out the second bomb WAS within 200 yards. Sitting down in Cockspur Street, probably an area where people would have been evacuated to had the first one gone off. We were joking at work about a case where a car bomb hadn't paid the congestion charge, towed to a carpark miles away, and ended up blowing up in a deserted car pound ![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 11:36 am, "MichaelJP" wrote:
The ****ing Paddies get on my nerves. Why are they so heartless? If they like Ireland so much why don't they go and live there? Not really. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 12:00 pm, "MichaelJP" wrote:
"Recliner" wrote in message ... "MichaelJP" wrote in message m Why do the authorities feel it necessary to seal off such a large area when they have already made the bomb safe and removed the explosive material? Someone said that it was so the police could forensically search the area for stuff the suspect might have dropped. However there have been no teams of police on hands and knees conducting fingertip searches or anything like that. Or is it not really needed at all and its just to make a statement to the public about how serious it could have been? Perhaps they want to make sure there aren't any more bombs in the area? If that's really the case then they should close all of central London. There is no particular reason that another bomb should be within 200 yards of the Mercedes. A typical Al Quaeda plot would involve multiple bombs, but spread over several miles. Who said anything about Al Qaida? The last nailbomb in London was a facist plot against the gay community wasn't it? Isn't it gay pride this weekend? Probably just a co-incidence. Maybe they hope to get a better response from the public that way. Suits the media though, one headline screamed that 1700 people would have been killed. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Weaver wrote:
Who said anything about Al Qaida? The last nailbomb in London was a facist plot against the gay community wasn't it? A lone individual cannot plot. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Suspected bomb on Jubilee line | London Transport | |||
Bomb fallout thought | London Transport | |||
Don't worry, it's not a bomb! | London Transport | |||
Re Bomb Blasts in London | London Transport | |||
SE terrorists were going to bomb....... | London Transport |