Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#111
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Mr Thant wrote:
On Jul 13, 10:57 pm, "Paul Scott" wrote: "Charles Ellson" wrote in message ... On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:31:08 -0700, MIG wrote: Just what I was thinking, but then I thought "Don't say anything ... any plan to replace 313s and 508s must be encouraged". Unfortunately, about the only thing that is more uncomfortable than a 313 on the DC line is a tube train. Ever since I first heard this, I wondered if passengers really want, or need, tube stock all the way out to Watford Junction, given the competing County service for 'whole route' travel. What are the loadings like on the upper reaches of the DC lines anyway - and is it possible TfL's drive for high frequency tube style services could get a bit carried away? Isn't the theory that these services will be for local travel around Watford - people commuting in to Watford from the south etc? I've certainly heard that idea in connection with the Croxley Link, so i assume something similar applies here to some extent. If not, i'd agree. Tube stock is not really suitable for this service. TfL are pretty much obligated to provide a service to Watford anyway, so I think the idea is that sending Bakerloo Line trains up is cheaper than running a whole separate operation. TfL are going to be running proper trains along the NLR as well, so no whole separate operation is needed. tom -- The girlfriend of my friend is my enemy. |
#112
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, D7666 wrote:
On Jul 13, 3:57 pm, Charles Ellson wrote: Any time I have been down that way the non-rush hour loadings of the tube trains on the DC line hardly seem to exceed about a dozen people Really IMHO what needs to be done - nay should have been done under WCML PUG - is abandon the DC out of Euston, convert it to AC and have a full 6 track railway between Euston and Watford. To what end? It's 4-track north of Watford Junction, so having six tracks between Euston and there doesn't increase the functional capacity of the line. The only thing i can think of that you could use these new OHLE tracks for would be a local service to WJ - and they're doing that pretty well with DC electrification. Unless you're suggesting a rather more frequent service to St Albans Abbey? ![]() tom -- The girlfriend of my friend is my enemy. |
#113
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:56:36 +0100, Tom Anderson
wrote: On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, D7666 wrote: On Jul 13, 3:57 pm, Charles Ellson wrote: Any time I have been down that way the non-rush hour loadings of the tube trains on the DC line hardly seem to exceed about a dozen people Really IMHO what needs to be done - nay should have been done under WCML PUG - is abandon the DC out of Euston, convert it to AC and have a full 6 track railway between Euston and Watford. To what end? It's 4-track north of Watford Junction, so having six tracks between Euston and there doesn't increase the functional capacity of the line. The only thing i can think of that you could use these new OHLE tracks for would be a local service to WJ - and they're doing that pretty well with DC electrification. Unless you're suggesting a rather more frequent service to St Albans Abbey? ![]() Kensal Green and South Hampstead tunnels might knacker the provision of OHLE if the clearances aren't sufficient although dual-voltage stock would cure that (i.e. proper stuff, not 313s). ISTR someone else has already suggesting converting St.Albans to trams, which if done Karlsruhe-style cures the problem of getting from the east side of Watford to the DC line (i.e. go via the streets rather than provide a flyover/under) and provides an excuse for at least partial provision of AC electrification on the north end of the DC line and the outer parts of the Met. |
#114
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 4, 3:16 pm, Mr Thant
wrote: TfL have announced a follow on order for Electrostars, mainly for 4th cars for their North London Railway fleet:http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/medi...ntre/5432.aspx Is air conditioning really necessary? These trains will be stopping more frequently than 376s after all. Adding weight and fuel consumption should be considered very carefully in these energy conscious days. Rumours are that SWT is turning up Desiro thermostats due to its electricity bill... |
#115
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
EE507 wrote:
On Jul 4, 3:16 pm, Mr Thant wrote: TfL have announced a follow on order for Electrostars, mainly for 4th cars for their North London Railway fleet:http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/medi...ntre/5432.aspx Is air conditioning really necessary? Presumably you haven't travelled on the North London Line in the rush hour in summer, otherwise you wouldn't have needed to ask that question. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Last class 378 goes 5 car | London Transport | |||
Last class 378 goes 5 car | London Transport | |||
RAIB Investigation into an incident at Warren Street station, Victoria Line, London Underground, 11 July 2011 | London Transport | |||
Four-car North London Line | London Transport |