Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 Jul, 18:21, wrote:
On Jul 8, 9:52 wrote: On 6 Jul, 11:15, Boltar wrote: On 6 Jul, 11:05, Adrian wrote: Don't forget that the engine is basically just being used as a generator, therefore can run at optimum revs for the specific output - there's no requirement for any kind of useful rev range or torque curve. True , and I suppose that will mitigate it somewhat. However ultimately that engine will produce less power than a normal bus engine so when relying on the engine alone its going to be slower compared to the normal engine running at optimum gearing. B2003 You might be right for an outer suburban bus route, or one going from town to town. However, a bus in London will probably average about 15mph. Hypothesising a little, if a 6 litre engine can deliver 60mph, a 1.5 litre engine should deliver 15mph. The battery is being used as an accumulator so average speed determined average power requirement. On the flat, and assuming your drag is mainly air resistance power required to maintain a constant speed goes up as cube of speed. So if we assume that a 1.5 ltr engine can deliver 1/4 the power of a 6 litre engine then the 1.5 ltr engine should be able to maintain a speed of about 38mph if the 6ltr engine can maintain 60mph. It's why there isn't a huge difference between the best in the world cyclists and a reasonable club cyclist in average speed. IIRC, a 90 year old has done a 25mile time trial in just under an hour (so lets say 25mph). Saturday, the fastest rider managed a 5 mile time trial in just under 9 minutes (lets say 34mph) But Cancellara, all else being equal, was delivering 2.5x the power that that 90 year old was managing. Yesterday David Millar managed the first hour at 30mph. That's still 70% more power of that 90 year old for just a 20% increase in speed. Tim. I broadly agree though I doubt if the main force for an inner city bus is air resistance. Partly because of the cube law you refer to, at low speeds air resistance is not so important. For a traditional bus, most of the energy from the motor will end up in the brakes, so regenerative braking is very important, though its a long way off 100% efficient. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"Hybrid" buses | London Transport | |||
Hybrid buses in London | London Transport | |||
Full hybrid buses | London Transport | |||
What happened to the Hybrid buses? | London Transport | |||
What happened to the hybrid buses? | London Transport |