London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 26th 07, 06:38 AM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 66
Default St Pancras International

Am Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:47:47 UTC, schrieb "R.C. Payne"
auf uk.railway :

2) Trains through the tunnel must meet very stringent safety
requirements. Probably the most awkward of these is the need to be able
to didvide the train to use part of the train to remove passengers so
that a disabled and dangerous half-set can be abandonned in the tunnel,
and the passengers can be evacuated.


This divisibility was a requirement imposed by the IGC
(Intergovernmental Commission) back then, but is no longer a
requirement put forward by Eurotunnel. The minimum requirements are
laid out in Eurotunnel's "Network Statement" which can be found on
their website, following the third section link "Corporate
information", then in the "About us" section of the left hand
navigation column selecting "Our developments".

As Nick D7666 wrote in his reply, most current high-speed trainsets
circulating on European continent would meet the safety requirements
of Eurotunnel in regard to be fireproof, power requirements etc.

The requirement for "fire proof doors between some cars" might
require modifications in the trains, but that could be done.

Rather difficult is the requirement that a train should be so long
that at least one door is near one of the emergency exits to the
service tunnel, whereever the trains comes to a full stop, and that
this door is accessible internally from all cars in the train.

This requires a single trainset with a minimum length of 375 meters
between the outermost doors at both ends.

The ICE-3 is conceived as a eight car trainset of 200 meters
length, composed of two modules of four cars each, the pilot car being
one of that four-car module. Two of such trainsets can be coupled
(automatically) to form a double traction, which is done and undone
quite often depending on the traffic requirements, but such a double
traction does not have the thru corridor. While a trainset of sixteen
cars is thinkable, it would require quite some redesign of four-car
modules without the pilot car.

But as mentioned elsewhere, the safety requirements are doable, but
the security requirements make it, in my opinion, economically
unfeasable to go to other destinations on the continent beyond London
and Brussels.


Cheers,
L.W.

  #2   Report Post  
Old July 26th 07, 01:35 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2005
Posts: 94
Default St Pancras International

Lüko Willms wrote:
Am Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:47:47 UTC, schrieb "R.C. Payne"
auf uk.railway :

2) Trains through the tunnel must meet very stringent safety
requirements. Probably the most awkward of these is the need to be able
to didvide the train to use part of the train to remove passengers so
that a disabled and dangerous half-set can be abandonned in the tunnel,
and the passengers can be evacuated.


This divisibility was a requirement imposed by the IGC
(Intergovernmental Commission) back then, but is no longer a
requirement put forward by Eurotunnel. The minimum requirements are
laid out in Eurotunnel's "Network Statement" which can be found on
their website, following the third section link "Corporate
information", then in the "About us" section of the left hand
navigation column selecting "Our developments".

As Nick D7666 wrote in his reply, most current high-speed trainsets
circulating on European continent would meet the safety requirements
of Eurotunnel in regard to be fireproof, power requirements etc.


I haven't the time to trawl the documents myself, but do they permit the
use of a high voltage bus through the train in the tunnel? Both the
conventional TGV and ICE3 designs (AIUI) employ a high voltage bus along
much of the train length.

Robin
  #3   Report Post  
Old July 26th 07, 03:51 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 66
Default St Pancras International

Am Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:35:28 UTC, schrieb "R.C. Payne"
auf uk.railway :

As Nick D7666 wrote in his reply, most current high-speed trainsets
circulating on European continent would meet the safety requirements
of Eurotunnel in regard to be fireproof, power requirements etc.


I haven't the time to trawl the documents myself, but do they permit the
use of a high voltage bus through the train in the tunnel? Both the
conventional TGV and ICE3 designs (AIUI) employ a high voltage bus along
much of the train length.


Yeah, I think you are right -- the ICE-3 do not have the high
voltage line along the whole train, but from car to car, from one
isolator to another. So that may be another issue.


Cheers,
L.W.



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Taxi time from Paddington to St. Pancras International - Fridaymorning? Traveller London Transport 4 June 6th 08 08:09 PM
Stansted - St Pancras International - routeing query [email protected] London Transport 12 May 16th 08 09:52 AM
St Pancras International opening day [email protected] London Transport 8 November 18th 07 08:26 AM
Easy interchanges in London (Waterloo vs St. Pancras International) Olof Lagerkvist London Transport 50 September 12th 07 11:31 PM
Waterloo International to close when St Pancras International opens [email protected] London Transport 0 April 1st 04 12:29 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017