Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Evening all,
Was just reading some old stuff about the channel tunnel project, and came across a report on a discussion of "Transportation aspects of the Channel Tunnel and its London Terminal", which i think dates from the early 70s: http://www.atypon-link.com/doi/pdf/1...icep.1974.4132 No idea if that's accessible to people without blessed IP addresses, but on page 109, there's some discussion of the site of the London passenger terminal, for which a new station in White City was the front runner; the use of Victoria is discussed and rejected, and another site is mentioned, only to be dismissed with the phrase i quote in the subject line. Guess where? Give you a clue - starts with a W and ends in "aterloo" ... Made me laugh, anyway! What they would have thought of tunnelling right in to King's Cross, i really don't know. This White City station is interesting, though. The planned CTRL would come in to London at South Croydon, along an existing alignment, then run in tunnel to Balham, surface and carry on on new tracks to Clapham Junction (didn't realise there was space for another pair here), then join the WLL and wind up at this place in White City. I don't know where the station itself would have been; the document says the land is in railway ownership, but from the relation to the roads, it simplies it would have been on the site now occupied by the BBC. It also says it's close to Old Oak Common and Willesden Junction, and two underground lines. tom -- YOU HAVE NO CHANCE TO ARRIVE MAKE ALTERNATIVE TRAVEL ARRANGEMENTS. -- Robin May |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Tom
Anderson writes No idea if that's accessible to people without blessed IP addresses, It's not ![]() I don't know where the station itself would have been; the document says the land is in railway ownership, but from the relation to the roads, it simplies it would have been on the site now occupied by the BBC. From memory, it was intended to occupy the site of the White City Sidings - now part of the White City development. So it would have been on the east side of Wood Lane rather than on the BBC's side. In fact, I think it was probably quite a long way further over - adjacent to the West London line, just north of Shepherd's Bush (Central line), thus giving handy access to North Pole depot. I recall that White City was still in the running (along with Stratford and St Pancras) as late as 1989 when it was already known that an alternative to Waterloo would be needed. -- Paul Terry |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom Anderson" wrote in message
h.li... Evening all, Was just reading some old stuff about the channel tunnel project, and came across a report on a discussion of "Transportation aspects of the Channel Tunnel and its London Terminal", which i think dates from the early 70s: http://www.atypon-link.com/doi/pdf/1...icep.1974.4132 No idea if that's accessible to people without blessed IP addresses, but on page 109, there's some discussion of the site of the London passenger terminal, for which a new station in White City was the front runner; the use of Victoria is discussed and rejected, and another site is mentioned, only to be dismissed with the phrase i quote in the subject line. Guess where? Give you a clue - starts with a W and ends in "aterloo" ... Made me laugh, anyway! What they would have thought of tunnelling right in to King's Cross, i really don't know. This White City station is interesting, though. The planned CTRL would come in to London at South Croydon, along an existing alignment, then run in tunnel to Balham, surface and carry on on new tracks to Clapham Junction (didn't realise there was space for another pair here), then join the WLL and wind up at this place in White City. I don't know where the station itself would have been; the document says the land is in railway ownership, but from the relation to the roads, it simplies it would have been on the site now occupied by the BBC. It also says it's close to Old Oak Common and Willesden Junction, and two underground lines. tom -- YOU HAVE NO CHANCE TO ARRIVE MAKE ALTERNATIVE TRAVEL ARRANGEMENTS. -- Robin May I have such a document, dated January 1974, although it only has a few pages, plus lots of maps! The White City site is shown as parallel to and between the West Cross Route and Wood Lane. The southern boundary being Ariel Way, with Westway to the north. The artist's impression shows the BBC building in the distance. It allowed for the Central Line to remain where it was with a new Met line station overhead. The route through Clapham (with the turn on to Chelsea bridge even sharper than the present Wandsworth Road/Vauxhall curve) is only a thick black line so how it would actually have been done I don't know. MaxB |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Best Web Sites For Rail Fare Bargains | London Transport | |||
Cross River Tram "top of Boris's list" | London Transport | |||
It's not big, it's not clever - "Source who works for TfL" picks onpoor gullible journalist | London Transport | |||
Oystercard - not quite as useful as we were led to believe | London Transport | |||
New(ish) book: "Britain's Historic Railway Buildings: An Oxford Gazetteer of Structures and Sites" | London Transport |