Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Crosland wrote:
They have the same status as a STOP sign and there does not need to be any other for them to take effect. Richard J replied: In what way does a box junction have the same status as a Stop sign? You don't have to stop *before* crossing them, and stopping *on* them is allowed if you are waiting to turn right across oncoming traffic. "Peter Crosland" then wrote: In the sense that it is a road sign. Parking restrictions and bus lanes require statutory notices to be published to allow them to be enforced. Many road-signs (as well as markings) DO require statutory notices (Traffic Orders) to make them enforceable, for example a 'no right turn' sign does. So does a 'no entry' sign. But a yellow box doesn't. |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Robin
Smith writes As I said, I do intend to pay the fine (which will double if I do not do so soon), but what with all these loop holes associated with bus lane cameras and speed cameras, I was genuinely interested in knowing whether there were similar loop holes associated with box junctions. Since the penalty notice my awareness of box junctions has increased, and my driving improved, so good will come of this. I am not the type of person to challenge the law when I know I have done wrong. And next time you can't get through a junction because some self-centred idiot who doesn't give a **** about anyone else apart from him (or her) self and getting where they want to go is blocking the junction. You just keep your fingers crossed and pray to God that the idiot blocking all the traffic manages to find a loop-hole and get out of paying that fine. -- CJG |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 01:24:20 GMT, "Martin Underwood"
wrote: Seeing the above Highway Code URL has reminded me of the rule about turning into a road where pedestrians are crossing. Notice that it says "if they are already crossing". As a cyclist and a driver, I've seen a lot of pedestrians treating sideroads as if they were zebra crossings - ie as if they have the right to hold traffic up indefinitely, rather than waiting until the road is clear before crossing :-( As a pedestrian, I wouldn't dream of starting to cross a road (except on a zebra crossing or a pelican crossing) unless it was safe to do so. While many may be doing this just out of stubbornness, it's useful to know that, in Germany, pedestrians legally have the right of way over turning cars at this kind of junction. Indeed, the pedestrian lights turn green when the traffic lights are still green in one direction. It took some getting used to when travelling back home from Germany by train via London - after being beeped a few times in London I remembered the UK's different traffic laws! Neil |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Clive D. W. Feather" wrote in message
... In article , Roland Perry writes Box junctions. These have criss-cross yellow lines painted on the road (see Other road markings section). You MUST NOT enter the box until your exit road or lane is clear. However, you may enter the box and wait when you want to turn right, and are only stopped from doing so by oncoming traffic, or by other vehicles waiting to turn right. It seems to me that this advice is rather naive, because it assumes that the only impediment to the "car in front of you that's also waiting to turn right" is the flow of oncoming traffic - which will eventually stop. The wording appears to have changed. It *was* something like "... oncoming traffic going ahead or also turning right". In other words, *one* car can wait on the box to turn right from each direction, but that's all; the second car in each queue must wait to enter the box, just as when going straight ahead. Is this one of those cases where the London habit of turning right involves passing off-side to off-side with the other turning traffic, instead of the system used everywhere else of passing nearside to nearside? The other traffic waiting to turn right may be travelling in the opposite direction. -- Terry Harper http://www.terry.harper.btinternet.co.uk/ |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil Williams wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 01:24:20 GMT, "Martin Underwood" wrote: Seeing the above Highway Code URL has reminded me of the rule about turning into a road where pedestrians are crossing. Notice that it says "if they are already crossing". As a cyclist and a driver, I've seen a lot of pedestrians treating sideroads as if they were zebra crossings - ie as if they have the right to hold traffic up indefinitely, rather than waiting until the road is clear before crossing :-( As a pedestrian, I wouldn't dream of starting to cross a road (except on a zebra crossing or a pelican crossing) unless it was safe to do so. While many may be doing this just out of stubbornness, it's useful to know that, in Germany, pedestrians legally have the right of way over turning cars at this kind of junction. Indeed, the pedestrian lights turn green when the traffic lights are still green in one direction. It's the same in France. It saves having a separate pedestrian phase on the lights, thus improving the traffic capacity of the junction but without reducing pedestrian facilities. A bit too radical for the UK safety mafia though. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote in message .. .
Yes, but the road to the right might have been clear when you first entered the box. However, I suppose if we look closely, the offence is *entering* a box junction at the worn time. Not being sat in a legally entered box junction feeling like a prat and blocking the traffic... It's interesting to observe all the discussion about the confusion over what is allowed when turning right in a box junction. Alas, the box junction in question on the North Circular where I received the penalty had no right turn junction (only traffic merging from the left, and crossing from the right) - so there is no excuse here. Perhaps they do not have box junction cameras as such "right enabled" box junctions? Robin |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Clive D. W. Feather
writes Box junctions. These have criss-cross yellow lines painted on the road (see Other road markings section). You MUST NOT enter the box until your exit road or lane is clear. However, you may enter the box and wait when you want to turn right, and are only stopped from doing so by oncoming traffic, or by other vehicles waiting to turn right. -- Highway Code I'm amazed by those who didn't know this, since it came up as one of the questions the first time I passed the driving test well over 20 years ago. It seems to me that this advice is rather naive, because it assumes that the only impediment to the "car in front of you that's also waiting to turn right" is the flow of oncoming traffic - which will eventually stop. The wording appears to have changed. It *was* something like "... oncoming traffic going ahead or also turning right". In other words, *one* car can wait on the box to turn right from each direction, but that's all; the second car in each queue must wait to enter the box, just as when going straight ahead. Yes, and some people are assuming that the junction is a cross roads. It might just as well be a right turn only (from the right turning vehicle's point of view) which means that being the second vehicle to enter the box waiting to turn right doesn't actually obstruct anyone. -- "It used to be that what a writer did was type a bit and then stare out of the window a bit, type a bit, stare out of the window a bit. Networked computers make these two activities converge, because now the thing you type on and the window you stare out of are the same thing" - Douglas Adams 28/1/99. |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:38:53 GMT, "Martin Underwood"
wrote: The "approved" method of turning right, as described in the Highway Code and Roadcraft is to pass offside to offside (ie with the drivers' sides next to each other) as this gives each driver a clear view of the oncoming traffic so he can judge when it's safe for him to turn. It also means that no car is turning in front of oncoming traffic. So if the oncoming car is in fact intending to go straight ahead rather than turn right (perhaps an indicator left on by mistake), there will not be an accident. -- Cynic |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... "K" wrote in message ... But what if your exit road is clear when you go into the box, but gets blocked by oncoming cars turning left and then witing in a queue? :-) The law makes clear that this is allowed (if you are turning right), even though the highway code does not. Except you'll still get fined. That situatuion was what caused me to get my one and only fine. -- ________________________ Conor Turton ICQ:31909763 ________________________ |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Conor
writes But what if your exit road is clear when you go into the box, but gets blocked by oncoming cars turning left and then witing in a queue? :-) The law makes clear that this is allowed (if you are turning right), even though the highway code does not. Except you'll still get fined. That situatuion was what caused me to get my one and only fine. Sounds like a miscarriage of justice. Take it to the Appeal Court !! -- "It used to be that what a writer did was type a bit and then stare out of the window a bit, type a bit, stare out of the window a bit. Networked computers make these two activities converge, because now the thing you type on and the window you stare out of are the same thing" - Douglas Adams 28/1/99. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Box Signal Box and Junction Road Junction | London Transport | |||
Staggered stop line and odd box junction | London Transport | |||
Box Junction cameras to be rolled London wide following successful pilot | London Transport | |||
Box Junction Victory? | London Transport | |||
Oystercard and penalty fares | London Transport |