Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 12:10:54 GMT, Olof Lagerkvist
wrote: David of Broadway wrote: Olof Lagerkvist wrote: I have also sometimes wondered why the platform for anti-clockwise Circle Line at Notting Hill Gate is signed "Westbound". The line is drawn north-south on the tube map around there, and the actual direction of the real tracks are also more south than west. I think I missed a train last summer because of this. I was going to Gloucester Road or South Kensington. That's exactly what I had in mind. It feels just wrong to call it "Westbound" in that case. About the same as Boltar's example, travelling from Cockfosters to for example Finsbury Park on the Piccadilly Line and they are calling that "Westbound" when it is so obviously travelling south, or actually slightly south-east... There are always going to be slightly non-intuitive local examples - consider Euston/KXSP on the Victoria and Northern lines. I think we're quite lucky to have such prominent line diagrams all over the place. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
James Farrar wrote:
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 12:10:54 GMT, Olof Lagerkvist wrote: from Cockfosters to for example Finsbury Park on the Piccadilly Line and they are calling that "Westbound" when it is so obviously travelling south, or actually slightly south-east... There are always going to be slightly non-intuitive local examples - consider Euston/KXSP on the Victoria and Northern lines. Yes, of course, but in the Piccadilly Line case the question is more why the signage was changed from from northbound/southbound to eastbound/westbound north of Holborn. I think we're quite lucky to have such prominent line diagrams all over the place. Agree. Compared to some other metro systems etc London Underground has really good and useful line diagrams, maps, both station/platform and on-train signage and similar information to passengers. -- Olof Lagerkvist ICQ: 724451 Web: http://here.is/olof |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 15:11:14 GMT, Olof Lagerkvist
wrote: Agree. Compared to some other metro systems etc London Underground has really good and useful line diagrams, maps, both station/platform and on-train signage and similar information to passengers. My one biggest criticism of the NYC Subway when I was there earlier this year was the way that the line diagrams tended to be tiny and hidden away on pillars... |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:47:02 -0400, David of Broadway
wrote: But at least someone familiar with the overall Piccadilly line can understand the east-west nomenclature. As can, for that matter, someone familiar with the overall District line. But an east-west nomenclature obviously makes no sense for the Circle line as a whole, nor does it make sense at that particular point on the line. The alternative is to have the line diagrams say something like "District line Westbound and Circle line Anti-clockwise" - which would also confuse some people, no doubt... |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
James Farrar wrote:
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:47:02 -0400, David of Broadway wrote: But at least someone familiar with the overall Piccadilly line can understand the east-west nomenclature. As can, for that matter, someone familiar with the overall District line. But an east-west nomenclature obviously makes no sense for the Circle line as a whole, nor does it make sense at that particular point on the line. [Notting Hill Gate] The alternative is to have the line diagrams say something like "District line Westbound and Circle line Anti-clockwise" - which would also confuse some people, no doubt... How about "District & Circle Lines Southbound"? -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com, Kev
writes The trains quite often carry the wrong destination. Many times I have got on south bound trains at Camden apparently going to Edgware and many a time there have been arguements between the driver and the station staff as to whether it was a Bank or Charing Cross train. At Camden Town it's really easy: look at the station headwall: Green light: Charing Cross Green light and white diagonal stripe: Bank Yellow light: it's not going yet, wait until it changes. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boltar wrote:
Yeah , I remember those signs ![]() you , on the district line a few years back they used to have in car line diagrams with east on the left and west on the right so the line was completely reversed to what someone would see on the main tube map. Heaven knows what the idiots who came up with that idea were thinking (direction of travel of the train matching the map I suppose) but common sense has since prevailed however. They still have them on a lot of the single route lines - I never could understand why they don't have them on the others as well as apart from the Central & Piccadilly the trains don't turn round. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Olof Lagerkvist wrote:
Yes, of course, but in the Piccadilly Line case the question is more why the signage was changed from from northbound/southbound to eastbound/westbound north of Holborn. Perhaps historic as "southbound" would have been at Aldwych, but also the general direction of travel and the actual destinations - you would describe Russell Square and King's Cross St. Pancras as "north" of Holborn rather than "east" but I wouldn't use "south" alone to describe even Leicester Square & Piccadilly Circus. (And the entire strategy on the tube is to discourage as much use of Covent Garden as possible so that wouldn't factor either.) |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim Roll-Pickering" wrote in message ... Boltar wrote: Yeah , I remember those signs ![]() you , on the district line a few years back they used to have in car line diagrams with east on the left and west on the right so the line was completely reversed to what someone would see on the main tube map. Heaven knows what the idiots who came up with that idea were thinking (direction of travel of the train matching the map I suppose) but common sense has since prevailed however. They still have them on a lot of the single route lines - I never could understand why they don't have them on the others as well as apart from the Central & Piccadilly the trains don't turn round. BTW the carriage strip maps are available on the www for those who didn't know already... http://www.tfl.gov.uk/gettingaround/4572.aspx Paul S |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 1, 7:50 pm, Boltar wrote:
Of course it gets more interesting on the piccadilly line where from holborn to cockfosters "eastbound" is actually going north and westbound is south. Why they insist on doing this when is flippin obvious the train is going north-south is anyones guess. You are at Euston in a maze of twisty passages all alike. What do you want to do? GO NORTH You go North on the Victoria line and are at Kings Cross in a maze of twisty passages all alike. What do you want to do? GO NORTH You go North on the Northern line and are at Euston in a maze of twisty passages all alike. What do you want to do? GO NORTH You go ... Never wonder why Mornington Crescent is such a popular game? :-) Tim. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tube accessibility question, Russell Square and Gloucester Road | London Transport | |||
Question about tube strikes | London Transport | |||
Tube driver with mates in cab question | London Transport | |||
Tube question | London Transport | |||
Heathrow & Piccadilly Tube Question | London Transport |