Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I was at the southern end of Battersea Church Road recently, and a causeway leading into the river was absolutely covered in rubbish. I am guessing that Wandsworth Council is not responsible for cleaning anything below the high water mark, and that rubbish builds up there until the next high tide takes it back into the river. But the fact that rubbish builds up there makes it an ideal place to remove the rubbish and prevent it getting back into the river, so that it won't end up in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, where the pile of rubbish is already ten times the size of England. So is anyone responsible for de-littering causeways? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland wrote:
I was at the southern end of Battersea Church Road recently, and a causeway leading into the river was absolutely covered in rubbish. I am guessing that Wandsworth Council is not responsible for cleaning anything below the high water mark, and that rubbish builds up there until the next high tide takes it back into the river. But the fact that rubbish builds up there makes it an ideal place to remove the rubbish and prevent it getting back into the river, so that it won't end up in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, where the pile of rubbish is already ten times the size of England. So is anyone responsible for de-littering causeways? The PLA (Port of London Authority) have some relevant responsibilities, but I suspect they may only be concerned with safety of navigation (e.g. clearance of large objects) rather than general litter removal. In some areas voluntary groups do regular clean-ups. See www.thames21.org.uk -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:46:50 +0100, John Rowland
wrote: ... the middle of the Pacific Ocean, where the pile of rubbish is already ten times the size of England. I'm intrigued by this fact. Any further info? -- Fig |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article op.ty3s9ck8m4iaeb@dell,
Fig wrote: On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:46:50 +0100, John Rowland wrote: ... the middle of the Pacific Ocean, where the pile of rubbish is already ten times the size of England. I'm intrigued by this fact. Any further info? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Pacific_Gyre I'd've thought it unlikely rubbish from the Thames would end up there. -- Shenanigans! Shenanigans! Best of 3! -- Flash |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:46:50 +0100, John Rowland wrote:
I was at the southern end of Battersea Church Road recently, and a causeway leading into the river was absolutely covered in rubbish. I am guessing that Wandsworth Council is not responsible for cleaning anything below the high water mark, and that rubbish builds up there until the next high tide takes it back into the river. But the fact that rubbish builds up there makes it an ideal place to remove the rubbish and prevent it getting back into the river, so that it won't end up in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, where the pile of rubbish is already ten times the size of England. So is anyone responsible for de-littering causeways? see http://www.prnewswire.co.uk/cgi/news/release?id=24864 Theres loads of them on the river, much easier than picking stuff up. Steve |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:46:50 +0100, John Rowland wrote: I was at the southern end of Battersea Church Road recently, and a causeway leading into the river was absolutely covered in rubbish. I am guessing that Wandsworth Council is not responsible for cleaning anything below the high water mark, and that rubbish builds up there until the next high tide takes it back into the river. But the fact that rubbish builds up there makes it an ideal place to remove the rubbish and prevent it getting back into the river, so that it won't end up in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, where the pile of rubbish is already ten times the size of England. So is anyone responsible for de-littering causeways? see http://www.prnewswire.co.uk/cgi/news/release?id=24864 Theres loads of them on the river, much easier than picking stuff up. It may be easier, but it means that the rubbish stays on the foreshore at Battersea until the next spring tide, then spends a couple of weeks being washed back and forth by the tides until finally reaching Greenwich, that is if it hasn't meanwhile been dumped on another foreshore by another spring tide. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Bristow wrote:
In article op.ty3s9ck8m4iaeb@dell, Fig wrote: On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:46:50 +0100, John Rowland wrote: ... the middle of the Pacific Ocean, where the pile of rubbish is already ten times the size of England. I'm intrigued by this fact. Any further info? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Pacific_Gyre http://www.bestlifeonline.com/cms/pu...are_we_2.shtml |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 23, 9:56 pm, Steve wrote:
seehttp://www.prnewswire.co.uk/cgi/news/release?id=24864 Theres loads of them on the river, much easier than picking stuff up. Theres a rubbish catcher between the millenium bridge and blackfriars. Not sure how effective it is given its only about 10 or 20 foot wide. Most of the rubbish seems to sail past it. B2003 |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Mike Bristow wrote:
In article op.ty3s9ck8m4iaeb@dell, Fig wrote: On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:46:50 +0100, John Rowland wrote: ... the middle of the Pacific Ocean, where the pile of rubbish is already ten times the size of England. I'm intrigued by this fact. Any further info? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Pacific_Gyre I'd've thought it unlikely rubbish from the Thames would end up there. Quite. Here's more likely: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sargasso_sea tom -- Formal logical proofs, and therefore programs, are *utterly meaningless*. -- Dehnadi and Bornat |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:03:24 GMT, Richard J. wrote:
Steve wrote: [17 quoted lines suppressed] It may be easier, but it means that the rubbish stays on the foreshore at Battersea until the next spring tide, then spends a couple of weeks being washed back and forth by the tides until finally reaching Greenwich, that is if it hasn't meanwhile been dumped on another foreshore by another spring tide. As it says they have 2 boats and 8 traps, so its not just grenwich. I'm not sure what EA do above the Teddington boundary stone, I guess the weirs help. Grab a boat down the river some time, you will see them all the way down the tidal section. Steve |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|