Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Sep, 09:18, John B wrote:
If, as it sounds, the defect in question doesn't prevent the DMH from operating (i.e. your asleep/dead driver will still let go of it and the train will still stop), how does this have even the pretence of a safety issue? Basically, there is no safety issue. These trains have been in service for nearly 40 years, so statistically the chance of an incident occurring is pretty minimal. If there were concerns, implement double manning until assurances could be made. Certainly any minute risk is easily outweighed by the risks associated with overcrowding. This issue is all about train operators asserting their authority, and IMO they should be ashamed of themselves for inconveniencing and potentially endangering passengers for no good reason. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lack of trains on the drain | London Transport | |||
Sudbury Hill (Harrow) lack of information | London Transport | |||
FGW Link excels even Thames Strains at public safety (lack of ...) | London Transport | |||
Lack of road markings in Kensington & Chelsea | London Transport | |||
Thameslink ticket checks - or lack of! | London Transport |