Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Mwmbwls wrote:
http://www.londontravelwatch.org.uk/document/2940/get Interesting suggestions. Mostly fairly pedestrian, but LTW's job is to focus on things which can be practically delivered. Things which struck me: "on the Moorgate Welwyn Garden City / Hertford North routes contra peak services (i.e. northbound until 0900 and southbound after 1600) are only 2 tph." Christ! How the hell does that work? Do most of the trains run ECS back up north? How much time does that save over running in service? "Indeed we have seen no convincing explanation of why LUL can work on the basis of routine engineering access being provided largely at night, whereas on four-track sections of its network Network Rail imposes timetables which give it carte blanch Sunday access to 50% of the tracks." That isn't quite fair - on LU, the overnight closures are supplemented by a generous serving of weekend closures on many lines. Okay, so the tube is being heavily renewed rather than just maintained, but still. "We believe that the Dutch/Swiss Taktfahrplan system should be the model to adopt, with timetables planned on the mirror-image principle so that connections between trains are as good in one direction as they are in the other." The what now? There's a footnote about this earlier on that refers to LTW's 'Requirements for Train Services - Principles', but that doesn't make things enormously clearer to me. Probably because i'm not really aware of these "different patterns in each direction" situations. Anyway, sounds like a splendid plan! Treble kirsches all round! "work should start now to arrange for the transfer and refurbishment of Class 313 units as soon as they can be released from the London Overground." AAAAAARGH! 313s! 313s don't need refurbishment, they need a stake through the transformer and burying! Still, this is the only practical option at the moment. "However for weekday evenings, when the Moorgate service has recently been successfully extended to run up to 2200, the level of activity in the City and around Old Street is such that there appears to be a strong case for a further extension to the normal close of traffic." Amen to that. On fridays and saturdays, they could run those trains all night and have people on them. I've often been going home from an evening in the City, on various weeknights, and gone to Moorgate in an attempt to get a train straight home to Finsbury Park, and been thwarted. "An issue not covered in the RUS is that of high demand, and therefore of crowding issues, when fixtures are held at Arsenals new Emirates stadium." Bloody right! "The present situation is that Drayton Park station one of the closest to the stadium is closed when most events take place." Exactly! *******s! "Historically this is because of the restricted operating hours of the Moorgate line. It would obviously be beneficial for the line to be opened at these times, but First Capital Connect have made it clear that even if the line were open they would keep Drayton Park closed because its narrow island platform and booking hall access could not cope with the expected crowds. However opposite the present platform, on the down side, there is vacant land on which an additional platform could be built." Excellent idea, and why on earth was this not in the RUS? "London TravelWatch considers that this should be done as soon as possible, and we understand that S106 money may be obtainable as a contribution to such a scheme." S106 = Arsenal pays. tom -- The final chapter, prophetic, poetic |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 2, 12:01 am, Tom Anderson wrote:
"on the Moorgate Welwyn Garden City / Hertford North routes contra peak services (i.e. northbound until 0900 and southbound after 1600) are only 2 tph." Christ! How the hell does that work? Do most of the trains run ECS back up north? How much time does that save over running in service? I presume they spend the day in Hornsey depot, which doesn't give you much of a service. U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 2, 12:01 am, Tom Anderson wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Mwmbwls wrote: http://www.londontravelwatch.org.uk/document/2940/get Interesting suggestions. Mostly fairly pedestrian, but LTW's job is to focus on things which can be practically delivered. Things which struck me: "on the Moorgate Welwyn Garden City / Hertford North routes contra peak services (i.e. northbound until 0900 and southbound after 1600) are only 2 tph." Christ! How the hell does that work? Do most of the trains run ECS back up north? How much time does that save over running in service? "Indeed we have seen no convincing explanation of why LUL can work on the basis of routine engineering access being provided largely at night, whereas on four-track sections of its network Network Rail imposes timetables which give it carte blanch Sunday access to 50% of the tracks." That isn't quite fair - on LU, the overnight closures are supplemented by a generous serving of weekend closures on many lines. Okay, so the tube is being heavily renewed rather than just maintained, but still. "We believe that the Dutch/Swiss Taktfahrplan system should be the model to adopt, with timetables planned on the mirror-image principle so that connections between trains are as good in one direction as they are in the other." The what now? There's a footnote about this earlier on that refers to LTW's 'Requirements for Train Services - Principles', but that doesn't make things enormously clearer to me. Probably because i'm not really aware of these "different patterns in each direction" situations. Anyway, sounds like a splendid plan! Treble kirsches all round! "work should start now to arrange for the transfer and refurbishment of Class 313 units as soon as they can be released from the London Overground." AAAAAARGH! 313s! 313s don't need refurbishment, they need a stake through the transformer and burying! Still, this is the only practical option at the moment. "However for weekday evenings, when the Moorgate service has recently been successfully extended to run up to 2200, the level of activity in the City and around Old Street is such that there appears to be a strong case for a further extension to the normal close of traffic." Amen to that. On fridays and saturdays, they could run those trains all night and have people on them. I've often been going home from an evening in the City, on various weeknights, and gone to Moorgate in an attempt to get a train straight home to Finsbury Park, and been thwarted. "An issue not covered in the RUS is that of high demand, and therefore of crowding issues, when fixtures are held at Arsenals new Emirates stadium." Bloody right! "The present situation is that Drayton Park station one of the closest to the stadium is closed when most events take place." Exactly! *******s! "Historically this is because of the restricted operating hours of the Moorgate line. It would obviously be beneficial for the line to be opened at these times, but First Capital Connect have made it clear that even if the line were open they would keep Drayton Park closed because its narrow island platform and booking hall access could not cope with the expected crowds. However opposite the present platform, on the down side, there is vacant land on which an additional platform could be built." Excellent idea, and why on earth was this not in the RUS? "London TravelWatch considers that this should be done as soon as possible, and we understand that S106 money may be obtainable as a contribution to such a scheme." S106 = Arsenal pays. So what is the history of the line being closed at weekends? It was open on Sundays from the late 1970s when it reopened after the transfer. I am not clear on when it closed. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Anderson wrote:
Things which struck me: "on the Moorgate Welwyn Garden City / Hertford North routes contra peak services (i.e. northbound until 0900 and southbound after 1600) are only 2 tph." Christ! How the hell does that work? Do most of the trains run ECS back up north? Yes, empty north of Finsbury Park. How much time does that save over running in service? A lot. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 2, 12:15 am, MIG wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:01 am, Tom Anderson wrote: On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Mwmbwls wrote: http://www.londontravelwatch.org.uk/document/2940/get Interesting suggestions. Mostly fairly pedestrian, but LTW's job is to focus on things which can be practically delivered. Things which struck me: "on the Moorgate Welwyn Garden City / Hertford North routes contra peak services (i.e. northbound until 0900 and southbound after 1600) are only 2 tph." Christ! How the hell does that work? Do most of the trains run ECS back up north? How much time does that save over running in service? "Indeed we have seen no convincing explanation of why LUL can work on the basis of routine engineering access being provided largely at night, whereas on four-track sections of its network Network Rail imposes timetables which give it carte blanch Sunday access to 50% of the tracks." That isn't quite fair - on LU, the overnight closures are supplemented by a generous serving of weekend closures on many lines. Okay, so the tube is being heavily renewed rather than just maintained, but still. "We believe that the Dutch/Swiss Taktfahrplan system should be the model to adopt, with timetables planned on the mirror-image principle so that connections between trains are as good in one direction as they are in the other." The what now? There's a footnote about this earlier on that refers to LTW's 'Requirements for Train Services - Principles', but that doesn't make things enormously clearer to me. Probably because i'm not really aware of these "different patterns in each direction" situations. Anyway, sounds like a splendid plan! Treble kirsches all round! "work should start now to arrange for the transfer and refurbishment of Class 313 units as soon as they can be released from the London Overground." AAAAAARGH! 313s! 313s don't need refurbishment, they need a stake through the transformer and burying! Still, this is the only practical option at the moment. "However for weekday evenings, when the Moorgate service has recently been successfully extended to run up to 2200, the level of activity in the City and around Old Street is such that there appears to be a strong case for a further extension to the normal close of traffic." Amen to that. On fridays and saturdays, they could run those trains all night and have people on them. I've often been going home from an evening in the City, on various weeknights, and gone to Moorgate in an attempt to get a train straight home to Finsbury Park, and been thwarted. "An issue not covered in the RUS is that of high demand, and therefore of crowding issues, when fixtures are held at Arsenals new Emirates stadium." Bloody right! "The present situation is that Drayton Park station one of the closest to the stadium is closed when most events take place." Exactly! *******s! "Historically this is because of the restricted operating hours of the Moorgate line. It would obviously be beneficial for the line to be opened at these times, but First Capital Connect have made it clear that even if the line were open they would keep Drayton Park closed because its narrow island platform and booking hall access could not cope with the expected crowds. However opposite the present platform, on the down side, there is vacant land on which an additional platform could be built." Excellent idea, and why on earth was this not in the RUS? "London TravelWatch considers that this should be done as soon as possible, and we understand that S106 money may be obtainable as a contribution to such a scheme." S106 = Arsenal pays. So what is the history of the line being closed at weekends? It was open on Sundays from the late 1970s when it reopened after the transfer. I am not clear on when it closed.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I forget the exact dates, but it started to close on Sundays in the early 80s and on Saturdays and late evenings in about 1986/7, at a time when off-peak traffic was very light and there were spare paths into Kings Cross. Nowadays, the use of KX at weekends restricts the Sat and Sun services to 2 tph rather than 3. (A couple of years ago, the opening hours were extended to about 2150 rather than 2030.) IMO, FWIW, the service should run to Moorgate Mon-Sat and KX Sun. The Barbican Centre is a potential major source of traffic in the evenings but the last trains depart just before most performances finish! It is also clearly absurd not to provide enhanced facilities at Drayton Park for travelling supporters, especially given the huge expanse of derelict land (the former LT depot) by the station. But don't expect AFC to pay - why should they? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Tom
Anderson writes "on the Moorgate Welwyn Garden City / Hertford North routes contra peak services (i.e. northbound until 0900 and southbound after 1600) are only 2 tph." Christ! How the hell does that work? Do most of the trains run ECS back up north? The peak arrivals run ECS back up to the northern termini to provide another with-flow service. How much time does that save over running in service? 12.5 minutes. [Moorgate to WGC: 46 minutes in service, 33.5 minutes ECS.] -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2 Oct, 07:30, wrote:
"London TravelWatch considers that this should be done as soon as possible, and we understand that S106 money may be obtainable as a contribution to such a scheme." S106 = Arsenal pays. It is also clearly absurd not to provide enhanced facilities at Drayton Park for travelling supporters, especially given the huge expanse of derelict land (the former LT depot) by the station. But don't expect AFC to pay - why should they?- The section 106 issue concerning Arsenal's contribution has already been fixed when planning permission was granted. http://www.londontravelwatch.org.uk/document/2940/get An issue not covered in the RUS is that of high demand, and therefore of crowding issues, when fixtures are held at Arsenal's new Emirates stadium. The present situation is that Drayton Park station - one of the closest to the stadium - is closed when most events take place. Historically this is because of the restricted operating hours of the Moorgate line. It would obviously be beneficial for the line to be opened at these times, but First Capital Connect have made it clear that even if the line were open they would keep Drayton Park closed because its narrow island platform and booking hall access could not cope with the expected crowds. However opposite the present platform, on the down side, there is vacant land on which an additional platform could be built. London TravelWatch considers that this should be done as soon as possible, and we understand that S106 money may be obtainable as a contribution to such a scheme. This would benefit passengers for whom the Drayton Park route is convenient, and users of other local stations who would experience less congestion as a result. http://www.islington.gov.uk/Council/...06/09/2622.asp quote £2.5 million earmarked for Drayton Park Station Date: 08-Sep-06 by charles dean Islington Council is to investigate how to make it easier for fans to attend matches at Arsenal football stadium. A feasibility study looking at major improvements to Drayton Park Station is underway, and if the plans prove viable then £2.5million could be spent on increasing rail capacity, so more people can travel by train. As part of the planning conditions for the new Emirates stadium in Ashburton Grove, it was agreed that a feasibility study be carried out to investigate rail capacity options for the station. Three main areas will be looked at as part of the study: * enhancing and improving the station and its facilities * extending train services through Drayton Park, on the line connecting Finsbury Park, Drayton Park and Highbury and Islington * extending train services between Finsbury Park and Moorgate. At least £500,000 will be spent on station improvements, and if it proves viable to extend train services later in the evenings and on weekends, then up to £2million will be made available. Cllr Terry Stacy, Executive Member for Housing and Communities, said: "This study will look at the role Drayton Park plays on match days, as well as supporting the regeneration of the surrounding area. "We are delighted to be working with train company, First Capital Connect, and the London Development Agency to examine options for improving the station and local train services. Working together has already paid off with improved rail services via Finsbury Park on match days". For further information please contact Helen Fallon, Senior Transport Planner, on 020 7527 2785. Ends Notes to Editors: The London Development Agency will fund the study, the outcome of which is likely to be announced later this year. unquote |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Anderson wrote in uk.transport.london on Tue, 2 Oct 2007 00:01:47
+0100 .li: http://www.londontravelwatch.org.uk/document/2940/get [snip perverse desire for exorcism of 313s] "An issue not covered in the RUS is that of high demand, and therefore of crowding issues, when fixtures are held at Arsenals new Emirates stadium." "The present situation is that Drayton Park station one of the closest to the stadium is closed when most events take place." "Historically this is because of the restricted operating hours of the Moorgate line. It would obviously be beneficial for the line to be opened at these times, but First Capital Connect have made it clear that even if the line were open they would keep Drayton Park closed because its narrow island platform and booking hall access could not cope with the expected crowds. Which excuse is, patently, unmitigated bollox. There's a large paved area outside the station at street level which would be ideal for queuing, as happens at every other station near a football/other large capacity venue, and as used to happen at Gillespie Road. The difference is, I think. more to do with the fact that pretty well everywhere else it is LU who provide the staff for crowd/barrier control, whereas this would eat into FCC's profits. -- hike - a walking tour or outing, esp. of the self-conscious kind Chambers 20th Century Dictionary |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 2, 10:11 am, Dave Hillam ] wrote:
"Historically this is because of the restricted operating hours of the Moorgate line. It would obviously be beneficial for the line to be opened at these times, but First Capital Connect have made it clear that even if the line were open they would keep Drayton Park closed because its narrow island platform and booking hall access could not cope with the expected crowds. Which excuse is, patently, unmitigated bollox. There's a large paved area outside the station at street level which would be ideal for queuing, as happens at every other station near a football/other large capacity venue, and as used to happen at Gillespie Road. The difference is, I think. more to do with the fact that pretty well everywhere else it is LU who provide the staff for crowd/barrier control, whereas this would eat into FCC's profits. A case perhaps for transferring the route to London Overground? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
London Travelwatch on OEPs | London Transport | |||
God Bless Immigration: Military to Commandeer Inner City Schools | London Transport | |||
London TravelWatch criticises cash fare rises in London | London Transport | |||
London Travelwatch forum dead | London Transport |