Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So it looks like the crazy old Crossrail is going ahead! Coooooool!
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Offramp wrote:
So it looks like the crazy old Crossrail is going ahead! Coooooool! Shunt! Shunt! Kriss Krossrail'll make you shunt! Shunt! Ahem. Story he http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7024935.stm No mention of land value capture per se; i'm not sure quite how this "levy on London business rates" will work. "If the project gets the final go-ahead, construction would begin in 2010 with trains up and running by 2015." A likely story. Construction will start two years before the Olympics? Well, there is the point that the Olympics won't need TBMs, but i'm not convinced. John Kay (who he? -ed.) doesn't like it, no sir: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/49e9a016-7...0779fd2ac.html He dislikes it for stupid reasons, though, and says stupid things ("old postal tunnel" is probably the funniest, if not the most stupid). tom -- so if you hear a chaffinch out on the pull attempting a severely off-key version of "Sabotage" by the Beastie Boys then you're not actually going mad. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 2, 9:59 pm, Tom Anderson wrote:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Offramp wrote: Shunt! Shunt! Kriss Krossrail'll make you shunt! Shunt! Construction will start two years before the Olympics? Well, there is the point that the Olympics won't need TBMs, but i'm not convinced. John Kay (who he? -ed.) doesn't like it, no sir: I can foresee that in 2011 (like the JLE in 1998/9) the papers will start to say, 'Why isn't this thing ready? It's meant to be ready for the 2012 Olympics!?' Then the Gov will throw squillions of pounds at it and it'll open in May 2012. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Offramp" wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 2, 9:59 pm, Tom Anderson wrote: On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Offramp wrote: Shunt! Shunt! Kriss Krossrail'll make you shunt! Shunt! Construction will start two years before the Olympics? Well, there is the point that the Olympics won't need TBMs, but i'm not convinced. John Kay (who he? -ed.) doesn't like it, no sir: I can foresee that in 2011 (like the JLE in 1998/9) the papers will start to say, 'Why isn't this thing ready? It's meant to be ready for the 2012 Olympics!?' Then the Gov will throw squillions of pounds at it and it'll open in May 2012. The Crossrail work plans (available on their website) generally have two years of enabling works prior 6 years of main excavations, tunnelling and then station fit out. So if the journalists ever read the info, they should be writing about completion in 2016... Paul |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 2, 7:22 pm, Offramp wrote:
So it looks like the crazy old Crossrail is going ahead! Coooooool! Question is , will they do the sensible thing and build the tunnels to UIC gauge so there is at least the possibility of running dedicated double deck trains through them alongside normal UK trains , or will they build it to the hopeless 19th century UK loading gauge and then complaints about undercapcity start to surface a few years after opening? B2003 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Boltar" wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 2, 7:22 pm, Offramp wrote: So it looks like the crazy old Crossrail is going ahead! Coooooool! Question is , will they do the sensible thing and build the tunnels to UIC gauge so there is at least the possibility of running dedicated double deck trains through them alongside normal UK trains , or will they build it to the hopeless 19th century UK loading gauge and then complaints about undercapcity start to surface a few years after opening? Double deck trains don't work on frequently stopping lines with overlapping journeys like crossrail is expected to be. The Germans tried them in Munich as a solution to their capacity problem and promptly took them off again as they added no extra capacity. tim |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 Oct, 10:32, "tim....." wrote:
"Boltar" wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 2, 7:22 pm, Offramp wrote: So it looks like the crazy old Crossrail is going ahead! Coooooool! Question is , will they do the sensible thing and build the tunnels to UIC gauge so there is at least the possibility of running dedicated double deck trains through them alongside normal UK trains , or will they build it to the hopeless 19th century UK loading gauge and then complaints about undercapcity start to surface a few years after opening? Double deck trains don't work on frequently stopping lines with overlapping journeys like crossrail is expected to be. The Germans tried them in Munich as a solution to their capacity problem and promptly took them off again as they added no extra capacity. tim True. Double decker trains are mostly a solution for trains terminating at a big terminal, since most people will be getting off at just one stop. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 3, 10:37 am, sweek wrote:
On 3 Oct, 10:32, "tim....." wrote: "Boltar" wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 2, 7:22 pm, Offramp wrote: So it looks like the crazy old Crossrail is going ahead! Coooooool! Question is , will they do the sensible thing and build the tunnels to UIC gauge so there is at least the possibility of running dedicated double deck trains through them alongside normal UK trains , or will they build it to the hopeless 19th century UK loading gauge and then complaints about undercapcity start to surface a few years after opening? Double deck trains don't work on frequently stopping lines with overlapping journeys like crossrail is expected to be. The Germans tried them in Munich as a solution to their capacity problem and promptly took them off again as they added no extra capacity. How can they add no extra capacity? I don't follow. tim True. Double decker trains are mostly a solution for trains terminating at a big terminal, since most people will be getting off at just one stop.- Hide quoted text - They seem to work quite nicely on the RER in paris. B2003 |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Boltar" wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 3, 10:37 am, sweek wrote: On 3 Oct, 10:32, "tim....." wrote: "Boltar" wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 2, 7:22 pm, Offramp wrote: So it looks like the crazy old Crossrail is going ahead! Coooooool! Question is , will they do the sensible thing and build the tunnels to UIC gauge so there is at least the possibility of running dedicated double deck trains through them alongside normal UK trains , or will they build it to the hopeless 19th century UK loading gauge and then complaints about undercapcity start to surface a few years after opening? Double deck trains don't work on frequently stopping lines with overlapping journeys like crossrail is expected to be. The Germans tried them in Munich as a solution to their capacity problem and promptly took them off again as they added no extra capacity. How can they add no extra capacity? I don't follow. Because the extended dwell times at the stations whilst people get off through fewer doors means that a smaller number of trains can be scheduled through the tunnels each hour. tim True. Double decker trains are mostly a solution for trains terminating at a big terminal, since most people will be getting off at just one stop.- Hide quoted text - They seem to work quite nicely on the RER in paris. which only proves that they work in Paris tim |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 Oct, 12:24, "tim....." wrote:
They seem to work quite nicely on the RER in paris. which only proves that they work in Paris no, it only proves that they seem to work in Paris ;-P -- john band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Underground grammar fail | London Transport | |||
Boris: Crossrail not yet "signed, sealed and delivered" [was:Transport Secretary vows to finish Crossrail] | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport |