Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was pondering a map the other day, and I noted quite how close
Moorgate and Cannon Street are. I guess the city widened lines to Moorgate are a lost cause due to the planned work at Farringdon, but I wondered whether it has ever been suggested to extend the Northern City Line south of Moorgate and link up with the line at Cannon Street, making Cannon Street into a through station. This would allow, say, the extension of Northern City Line services to London Bridge and points onward (possibly as part of the Thameslink network?) Has this ever been suggested? Are they any especial difficulties apart from the sheer cost of tunnelling in EC2. (Bank of England vaults?, I can also imagine the gradient being a problem)? -- Abi |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Abigail Brady" wrote in message ups.com... I was pondering a map the other day, and I noted quite how close Moorgate and Cannon Street are. I guess the city widened lines to Moorgate are a lost cause due to the planned work at Farringdon, but I wondered whether it has ever been suggested to extend the Northern City Line south of Moorgate and link up with the line at Cannon Street, making Cannon Street into a through station. This would allow, say, the extension of Northern City Line services to London Bridge and points onward (possibly as part of the Thameslink network?) Has this ever been suggested? Are they any especial difficulties apart from the sheer cost of tunnelling in EC2. (Bank of England vaults?, I can also imagine the gradient being a problem)? Gradient would definitely be an issue, but isn't the Bank/Monument station complex in the way of the direct route as well? Multilevel tracks and station/escalator tunnels for Central/Northern/DLR and Drain, and connections between the two stations. When DLR extensions have been suggested in the past it is usually mentioned that the Bank of England vaults are in the way too! I trust you are looking at a geographical map rather than the 'tube map' btw... Paul S |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 8, 10:25 pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote: "Abigail Brady" wrote in message ups.com... I was pondering a map the other day, and I noted quite how close Moorgate and Cannon Street are. I guess the city widened lines to Moorgate are a lost cause due to the planned work at Farringdon, but I wondered whether it has ever been suggested to extend the Northern City Line south of Moorgate and link up with the line at Cannon Street, making Cannon Street into a through station. This would allow, say, the extension of Northern City Line services to London Bridge and points onward (possibly as part of the Thameslink network?) Has this ever been suggested? Are they any especial difficulties apart from the sheer cost of tunnelling in EC2. (Bank of England vaults?, I can also imagine the gradient being a problem)? Gradient would definitely be an issue, but isn't the Bank/Monument station complex in the way of the direct route as well? Multilevel tracks and station/escalator tunnels for Central/Northern/DLR and Drain, and connections between the two stations. When DLR extensions have been suggested in the past it is usually mentioned that the Bank of England vaults are in the way too! I trust you are looking at a geographical map rather than the 'tube map' btw... I think that the demolition of the Mansion House and the Bank of England might be problematic. Probably not as problematic as diving sharply enough from the viaduct that Cannon Street is on to get under the whole Bank station complex. That could be a new record gradient. Funnily enough, the buildings between Cannon Street and the Mansion House have recently been demolished and something else is presumably about to be built there, so I think that the chance has been missed. The only remaining possibility would be to start tunnelling south of the Thames and replace London Bridge and Cannon Street with new underground stations. It could be called Crosslink or Thamesrail or something. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Scott wrote:
"Abigail Brady" wrote in message ups.com... I was pondering a map the other day, and I noted quite how close Moorgate and Cannon Street are. I guess the city widened lines to Moorgate are a lost cause due to the planned work at Farringdon, but I wondered whether it has ever been suggested to extend the Northern City Line south of Moorgate and link up with the line at Cannon Street, making Cannon Street into a through station. This would allow, say, the extension of Northern City Line services to London Bridge and points onward (possibly as part of the Thameslink network?) Has this ever been suggested? Are they any especial difficulties apart from the sheer cost of tunnelling in EC2. (Bank of England vaults?, I can also imagine the gradient being a problem)? Gradient would definitely be an issue, but isn't the Bank/Monument station complex in the way of the direct route as well? http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...069/ltmonu.jpg It might be able to run through next to the Northern Line. When DLR extensions have been suggested in the past it is usually mentioned that the Bank of England vaults are in the way too! No, the Waterloo & City is the one which can't be extended without hitting the bank vaults. The gradient problems can't be got around (or got under). Extending the Northern City to a deep terminus the length of Walbrook would give nearly all of the benefits quite cheaply. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8 Oct, 23:13, MIG wrote:
On Oct 8, 10:25 pm, "Paul Scott" The only remaining possibility would be to start tunnelling south of the Thames and replace London Bridge and Cannon Street with new underground stations. It could be called Crosslink or Thamesrail or something. Oddly enough, one of the Thameslink 2000 route options was a huge tunnel under the Thames from just east of London Bridge to Farringdon. It would have been enormously expensive, and got in the way of the foundations for the Shard. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 Oct, 02:08, "John Rowland"
wrote: Paul Scott wrote: "Abigail Brady" wrote in message oups.com... I was pondering a map the other day, and I noted quite how close Moorgate and Cannon Street are. I guess the city widened lines to Moorgate are a lost cause due to the planned work at Farringdon, but I wondered whether it has ever been suggested to extend the Northern City Line south of Moorgate and link up with the line at Cannon Street, making Cannon Street into a through station. This would allow, say, the extension of Northern City Line services to London Bridge and points onward (possibly as part of the Thameslink network?) Has this ever been suggested? Are they any especial difficulties apart from the sheer cost of tunnelling in EC2. (Bank of England vaults?, I can also imagine the gradient being a problem)? Gradient would definitely be an issue, but isn't the Bank/Monument station complex in the way of the direct route as well? http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...069/ltmonu.jpg It might be able to run through next to the Northern Line. When DLR extensions have been suggested in the past it is usually mentioned that the Bank of England vaults are in the way too! No, the Waterloo & City is the one which can't be extended without hitting the bank vaults. The gradient problems can't be got around (or got under). Extending the Northern City to a deep terminus the length of Walbrook would give nearly all of the benefits quite cheaply. The Northern City is above the northern line - the only way to get next to or below the northern line is to veer off the route, which would make it hit bank vaults of one sort or another. The problem with that is that the walbrook (a river) crosses the path just east of 1 Poulty. Its in the way of any extension of the Northern City line south of Poultry. You could divert the Walbrook slightly, but at some point you'd still need to cross it, although it wouldn't be such an obstruction to join it up with the Waterloo + City line (although it has a completely different gauge). On the other hand, if you did that, you'd need to build completely new access from the Waterloo + city to the rest of Bank station and to the exit, because the current access would be in the way of any extension; if you are going to do that, you might as well build new platforms somewhere just along the extension, much nearer the rest of bank. That would leave the current platforms abandoned, unless you built new access to them, like they are going to do when they demolish bucklersbury house..... |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Rowland" wrote in message ... Paul Scott wrote: "Abigail Brady" wrote in message ups.com... I was pondering a map the other day, and I noted quite how close Moorgate and Cannon Street are. I guess the city widened lines to Moorgate are a lost cause due to the planned work at Farringdon, but I wondered whether it has ever been suggested to extend the Northern City Line south of Moorgate and link up with the line at Cannon Street, making Cannon Street into a through station. This would allow, say, the extension of Northern City Line services to London Bridge and points onward (possibly as part of the Thameslink network?) Has this ever been suggested? Are they any especial difficulties apart from the sheer cost of tunnelling in EC2. (Bank of England vaults?, I can also imagine the gradient being a problem)? Gradient would definitely be an issue, but isn't the Bank/Monument station complex in the way of the direct route as well? http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...069/ltmonu.jpg It might be able to run through next to the Northern Line. When DLR extensions have been suggested in the past it is usually mentioned that the Bank of England vaults are in the way too! No, the Waterloo & City is the one which can't be extended without hitting the bank vaults. The gradient problems can't be got around (or got under). Extending the Northern City to a deep terminus the length of Walbrook would give nearly all of the benefits quite cheaply. These sorts of questions would be much easier to answer if there were a 3D 'walk-through' computer model of sub-surface London, with its tunnels, vaults and other services. It's commonly done for new buildings, so why couldn't it be done for existing underground structures ? I suppose it's too much much to expect there already is one ? Jim Hawkins |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Paul Scott wrote:
"Abigail Brady" wrote in message ups.com... I was pondering a map the other day, and I noted quite how close Moorgate and Cannon Street are. I guess the city widened lines to Moorgate are a lost cause due to the planned work at Farringdon, but I wondered whether it has ever been suggested to extend the Northern City Line south of Moorgate and link up with the line at Cannon Street, making Cannon Street into a through station. Has this ever been suggested? Yes, about every eighteen months on this group! Are they any especial difficulties apart from the sheer cost of tunnelling in EC2. (Bank of England vaults?, I can also imagine the gradient being a problem)? Gradient would definitely be an issue Cannon Street bridge is 7.1 metres above the high water level of the Thames [1], perhaps less at the ends. The rail deck will be a little above that - not more than 9 metres, and probably less. It's about 260 metres from the point where the bridge makes landfall to Cannon Street itself, where the space occupied by the station ends (ish). If you hollowed out the existing station and put in a downward-sloping track at a gradient of 1:30 (generally considered the practical maximum, i think), you could drop 8.5 metres in that distance, leaving you at about the level of the river. You need about four metres over the top of the track for the train (six if you want OHLE, which we don't). If Cannon Street is four metres or more above the level of the river, this idea is just about plausible - at least this far! In terms of getting to Moorgate, you're then alright, as you have about 650 metres to run, in which space you can dive another 20 metres, which i think is enough. The problem, of course, is all the buildings and whatnot in between the two. If you could run under Walbrook and Prince's St, though, you might be alright. You might need to demolish No 1 Poultry, but it's a horrible building anyway. Don't ask me about how it all fits in with the Bank station complex. Didn't someone say they thought that was plausible? Lonelytraveller mentioned the Walbrook; i don't know what you'd do about that either. When DLR extensions have been suggested in the past it is usually mentioned that the Bank of England vaults are in the way too! The vaults thing is a red herring when it comes to the NCL, though - there have been serious proposals from the time it opened up to the 1960s to extend it southward, and none of those had any problem with vaults. The alternative to going to Cannon Street is to stay in deep tunnel, cross the river, go to underground platforms at London Bridge, and then surface onto the appropriate tracks east of the station, bypassing Cannon Street and its spur altogether. Although if you're going to do this, you might as well take the tunnel west and do something more interesting ... tom [1] http://www.the-river-thames.co.uk/bridgeheights.htm -- Hawaii may be many things, but it is not the sort of place you go to for smart, sexy, geeky women. It's more the place for luau excess, non-literate arts, and maritime athleticism. -- applez |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Anderson wrote:
Cannon Street bridge is 7.1 metres above the high water level of the Thames [1], perhaps less at the ends. The rail deck will be a little above that - not more than 9 metres, and probably less. It's about 260 metres from the point where the bridge makes landfall to Cannon Street itself, where the space occupied by the station ends (ish). If you hollowed out the existing station and put in a downward-sloping track at a gradient of 1:30 (generally considered the practical maximum, i think), you could drop 8.5 metres in that distance, leaving you at about the level of the river. You need about four metres over the top of the track for the train (six if you want OHLE, which we don't). If Cannon Street is four metres or more above the level of the river, this idea is just about plausible - at least this far! In terms of getting to Moorgate, you're then alright, as you have about 650 metres to run, in which space you can dive another 20 metres, which i think is enough. You would need to have flat platforms under Walbrook, to replace Cannon Street Station. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "lonelytraveller" wrote in message ups.com... On 8 Oct, 23:13, MIG wrote: On Oct 8, 10:25 pm, "Paul Scott" The only remaining possibility would be to start tunnelling south of the Thames and replace London Bridge and Cannon Street with new underground stations. It could be called Crosslink or Thamesrail or something. Oddly enough, one of the Thameslink 2000 route options was a huge tunnel under the Thames from just east of London Bridge to Farringdon. It would have been enormously expensive, and got in the way of the foundations for the Shard. The Government couldn't scrape £350M together, a mere 2%, to finish Crossrail so something like this wouldn't stand a snowball in hells chance of seeing the light of day. Kevin |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Cannon Street Boat-Train | London Transport | |||
Cannon Street - Bank OSI or NOSI? | London Transport | |||
What is the point of Cannon Street (National Rail) Station? | London Transport | |||
Cannon Street redevelopment (Cannon Place) | London Transport | |||
A Moorgate to London Bridge Tunnel (Old chestnut) | London Transport |