Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Oct, 11:58, Mizter T wrote:
Dare I suggest that as nothing has been heard on this front perhaps Oyster PAYG might not be immediately extended beyond Harrow and Wealdstone (H&W) - or if it is it won't be extended beyond Hatch End (the last station in zone 6) - at least not yet. The sample Overground tube map shows Carpender's Park to Watford Junction as Zone A, and Oyster will definitely be accepted on Overground services out there. but I can see that London Midland* might not be too happy at this loss of control and possibly revenue that might entail from accepting Oyster PAYG on their WJ to Euston fasts. The franchise spec requires them to be accepted within Zones 1-6. It appears to up to London Midland whether to accept them out to Watford Junction, and there hasn't been any word from them. U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Oct, 12:12, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 03:58:20 -0700, Mizter T wrote: On 13 Oct, 00:06, "Paul Scott" wrote: (snip) Pass validity aside for the moment - won't there have to be a complete rearrangement of zonal fares in that area, similar to the outer reaches of the Metropolitan's ABC&D? Presume they can't simply move zone 6, because Watford Junction towards London will still have West Midland & Southern services? Dare I suggest that as nothing has been heard on this front perhaps Oyster PAYG might not be immediately extended beyond Harrow and Wealdstone (H&W) - or if it is it won't be extended beyond Hatch End (the last station in zone 6) - at least not yet. Oyster PAYG will be extended to Watford Junction but there will be no change to the zonal validity of Travelcards nor of Freedom Passes. I know no more than this (via another group) so it is a case of wait and see. -- Paul C Thanks - as you say we shall see what is to happen shortly. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Corfield" wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 03:58:20 -0700, Mizter T wrote: On 13 Oct, 00:06, "Paul Scott" wrote: "Richard J." wrote: Pass validity aside for the moment - won't there have to be a complete rearrangement of zonal fares in that area, similar to the outer reaches of the Metropolitan's ABC&D? Presume they can't simply move zone 6, because Watford Junction towards London will still have West Midland & Southern services? Dare I suggest that as nothing has been heard on this front perhaps Oyster PAYG might not be immediately extended beyond Harrow and Wealdstone (H&W) - or if it is it won't be extended beyond Hatch End (the last station in zone 6) - at least not yet. Oyster PAYG will be extended to Watford Junction but there will be no change to the zonal validity of Travelcards nor of Freedom Passes. I know no more than this (via another group) so it is a case of wait and see. You would imagine the ticketing system precedent for West Midlands purposes is whatever method of farebox split is used to Amersham with Chiltern, so there shouldn't need to be any need to reinvent the wheel in this case? Obviously VWC won't take part due to their pick up & set down restrictions... Paul |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mr Thant wrote:
On 13 Oct, 11:58, Mizter T wrote: Dare I suggest that as nothing has been heard on this front perhaps Oyster PAYG might not be immediately extended beyond Harrow and Wealdstone (H&W) - or if it is it won't be extended beyond Hatch End (the last station in zone 6) - at least not yet. The sample Overground tube map shows Carpender's Park to Watford Junction as Zone A, and Oyster will definitely be accepted on Overground services out there. That was really just a promotional map, so I wouldn't take anything shown on it as gospel. Certainly, incorporating WJ (at least with regards to the London Overground services) in zone A would make sense. but I can see that London Midland* might not be too happy at this loss of control and possibly revenue that might entail from accepting Oyster PAYG on their WJ to Euston fasts. The franchise spec requires them to be accepted within Zones 1-6. It appears to up to London Midland whether to accept them out to Watford Junction, and there hasn't been any word from them. U In that case the franchise specification for London Midland merely appears to set in stone the existing situation - that Oyster PAYG is accepted on fast trains between H&W and Euston (and has been since, I think, Oyster PAYG was first introduced on LU). I guess it does also cover the situation that should London Midland wish to stop their trains at Queen's Park as well, then they'd also have to accept Oyster PAYG for journeys to/from there to/from Euston or H&W. But I don't think they'd have any desire to stop at Queen's Park though. I can now increasingly foresee a situation where Oyster PAYG will only available on the London Overground stoppers from Watford Junction, and not the London Midland fasts. We shall see what transpires. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Oct, 12:51, "Paul Scott" wrote:
"Paul Corfield" wrote in message (snip) Oyster PAYG will be extended to Watford Junction but there will be no change to the zonal validity of Travelcards nor of Freedom Passes. I know no more than this (via another group) so it is a case of wait and see. You would imagine the ticketing system precedent for West Midlands purposes is whatever method of farebox split is used to Amersham with Chiltern, so there shouldn't need to be any need to reinvent the wheel in this case? Obviously VWC won't take part due to their pick up & set down restrictions... Paul Dunno about that Paul. AIUI the traditional arrangement between Chiltern Railways and LU was that whoever sold the ticket kept the cash - and as part of this deal LU provided 'free' access to their metals. Maybe I'm very wrong on that though. I don't know if this situation has been modified, but whatever the idea that whoever sells the ticket keeps the cash doesn't translate at all well to Oyster PAYG. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mizter T" wrote in message oups.com... On 13 Oct, 12:51, "Paul Scott" wrote: "Paul Corfield" wrote in message (snip) Oyster PAYG will be extended to Watford Junction but there will be no change to the zonal validity of Travelcards nor of Freedom Passes. I know no more than this (via another group) so it is a case of wait and see. You would imagine the ticketing system precedent for West Midlands purposes is whatever method of farebox split is used to Amersham with Chiltern, so there shouldn't need to be any need to reinvent the wheel in this case? Obviously VWC won't take part due to their pick up & set down restrictions... Paul Dunno about that Paul. AIUI the traditional arrangement between Chiltern Railways and LU was that whoever sold the ticket kept the cash - and as part of this deal LU provided 'free' access to their metals. Maybe I'm very wrong on that though. I don't know if this situation has been modified, but whatever the idea that whoever sells the ticket keeps the cash doesn't translate at all well to Oyster PAYG. But isn't PAYG already available on Chiltern or LU from Amersham - maybe the cash is divvied up at the southern end of the journey, depending on where you enter or leave the system? Paul C has previously mentioned that there is a different default deduction on the joint LU/NR routes - perhaps this is part of the system? Paul S |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Oct, 13:20, "Paul Scott" wrote:
"Mizter T" wrote in message On 13 Oct, 12:51, "Paul Scott" wrote: "Paul Corfield" wrote in message (snip) Oyster PAYG will be extended to Watford Junction but there will be no change to the zonal validity of Travelcards nor of Freedom Passes. I know no more than this (via another group) so it is a case of wait and see. You would imagine the ticketing system precedent for West Midlands purposes is whatever method of farebox split is used to Amersham with Chiltern, so there shouldn't need to be any need to reinvent the wheel in this case? Obviously VWC won't take part due to their pick up & set down restrictions... Paul Dunno about that Paul. AIUI the traditional arrangement between Chiltern Railways and LU was that whoever sold the ticket kept the cash - and as part of this deal LU provided 'free' access to their metals. Maybe I'm very wrong on that though. I don't know if this situation has been modified, but whatever the idea that whoever sells the ticket keeps the cash doesn't translate at all well to Oyster PAYG. But isn't PAYG already available on Chiltern or LU from Amersham - maybe the cash is divvied up at the southern end of the journey, depending on where you enter or leave the system? Paul C has previously mentioned that there is a different default deduction on the joint LU/NR routes - perhaps this is part of the system? Paul S Yes - Oyster PAYG is indeed already available on Chiltern from Amersham, which mirrors the situation with paper tickets where LU & NR tickets are interavailable on this route. However Chiltern's Marylebone ticket office is the only place where Chiltern might take money off a passenger to add to an Oyster card for PAYG use (and I'm not 100% certain that the Marylebone ticket office deals in Oyster either - they could just send you across the concourse to the LU ticket office). To be honest I've no idea how the Oyster PAYG monies gets divided up when it comes to Chiltern and LU. If one bears in mind that Oyster PAYG is also valid from West/South Ruislip to Marylebone, wheras paper tickets are not (i.e. there is no conventional interavailability of ticketing on this route), this would suggest that Chiltern and LU have a more complicated arrangement in place - though whether it deals with ticketing as a whole, or just Oyster PAYG, I have no idea. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mizter T wrote:
Mr Thant wrote: On 13 Oct, 11:58, Mizter T wrote: Dare I suggest that as nothing has been heard on this front perhaps Oyster PAYG might not be immediately extended beyond Harrow and Wealdstone (H&W) - or if it is it won't be extended beyond Hatch End (the last station in zone 6) - at least not yet. The sample Overground tube map shows Carpender's Park to Watford Junction as Zone A, and Oyster will definitely be accepted on Overground services out there. That was really just a promotional map, so I wouldn't take anything shown on it as gospel. Certainly, incorporating WJ (at least with regards to the London Overground services) in zone A would make sense. I came to think about an interesting phenomenon with travelcard prices here. If WJ will join zone A, then Z1-6D travelcards would be accepted there. Such Network Railcard discounted off-peak travelcards bought from LUL ticket offices (or from NR ticket offices in zone A-D I think) cost £4.80. Today a railcard discounted off-peak travelcard WJ to Z1-6 costs £8.25. It would not surprise me if there will be some special restrictions or something for using such cheap Z1-6D travelcards from/to WJ. -- Olof Lagerkvist ICQ: 724451 Web: http://here.is/olof |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Oct, 14:19, Olof Lagerkvist wrote:
Mizter T wrote: Mr Thant wrote: On 13 Oct, 11:58, Mizter T wrote: Dare I suggest that as nothing has been heard on this front perhaps Oyster PAYG might not be immediately extended beyond Harrow and Wealdstone (H&W) - or if it is it won't be extended beyond Hatch End (the last station in zone 6) - at least not yet. The sample Overground tube map shows Carpender's Park to Watford Junction as Zone A, and Oyster will definitely be accepted on Overground services out there. That was really just a promotional map, so I wouldn't take anything shown on it as gospel. Certainly, incorporating WJ (at least with regards to the London Overground services) in zone A would make sense. I came to think about an interesting phenomenon with travelcard prices here. If WJ will join zone A, then Z1-6D travelcards would be accepted there. Such Network Railcard discounted off-peak travelcards bought from LUL ticket offices (or from NR ticket offices in zone A-D I think) cost £4.80. Today a railcard discounted off-peak travelcard WJ to Z1-6 costs £8.25. It would not surprise me if there will be some special restrictions or something for using such cheap Z1-6D travelcards from/to WJ. A very good point. Note however there are no NR ticket offices in zones A-D (at least at the moment). At the moment it is pure speculation to suggest WJ will join zone A - there's been no announcements whatsoever, and could well stay outside of the zonal system altogether. If that is the case then of course it'll be interesting to see how Oyster PAYG journeys are charged to/ from/between WJ/Watford High St/ Bushey/ Carpenders Park, and whether several journeys made to/from/between these stations would be capped. The simplest approach might simply be to charge a flat fare (of say £1) for all Oyster PAYG journeys on this line that start/end outside the zones (i.e. north of Hatch End). |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:20:58 +0100, "Paul Scott"
wrote: "Mizter T" wrote in message roups.com... On 13 Oct, 12:51, "Paul Scott" wrote: "Paul Corfield" wrote in message (snip) Oyster PAYG will be extended to Watford Junction but there will be no change to the zonal validity of Travelcards nor of Freedom Passes. I know no more than this (via another group) so it is a case of wait and see. You would imagine the ticketing system precedent for West Midlands purposes is whatever method of farebox split is used to Amersham with Chiltern, so there shouldn't need to be any need to reinvent the wheel in this case? Obviously VWC won't take part due to their pick up & set down restrictions... Dunno about that Paul. AIUI the traditional arrangement between Chiltern Railways and LU was that whoever sold the ticket kept the cash - and as part of this deal LU provided 'free' access to their metals. Maybe I'm very wrong on that though. I don't know if this situation has been modified, but whatever the idea that whoever sells the ticket keeps the cash doesn't translate at all well to Oyster PAYG. But isn't PAYG already available on Chiltern or LU from Amersham - maybe the cash is divvied up at the southern end of the journey, depending on where you enter or leave the system? Paul C has previously mentioned that there is a different default deduction on the joint LU/NR routes - perhaps this is part of the system? I'm not close to the detail on all of this these days but I would guess it works as you suggest. Where Oyster PAYG is used on a shared section like Harrow to Chorleywood it is impossible to detect what train was used. Therefore whatever the apportionment rules are for cash tickets would apply to PAYG revenues. I can't see someone sitting down trying to link the entry and exit times from card data to the most likely or actual train departure / arrivals. Too much work for too little benefit. Where PAYG data allows unequivocal decisions to be taken on what company was used (as in Chiltern trains to and from Marylebone) then I would expect the money would go the operator via the settlement process. The only other comment to make is that all the above is fine and dandy but who knows what impact ticketing history may have. On the Watford Junction issue I doubt very much that London Midland will voluntarily decide to accept PAYG to Watford Junction. However any restriction will be extremely difficult to police given the interavailability to Harrow and Wealdstone and the complete lack of separation of platforms, exits and gatelines at Watford and Euston. If, as Mr Thant says, stations north of the zone boundary are in Zone A then the compromise is to set a fare value in that instance at a level that London Midland can live with and which is acceptable to TfL. There will probably be an element of "suck it and see" initially and once the usage and revenue data stabilises then a more robust settlement position will be put in place. The gradual moves over several years to adopt the LU farescale on the line north of Queens Park show it can be done. The only complication might be how NR pricing works - IIRC Harrow and Wealdstone is a compilation point (might have the wrong term) for NR fares and I think this is why PAYG is accepted at H&W but not LU cash fares as that would mean using the LU fare for other pricing purposes. The same issues might arise at Watford Junction with much bigger implications for NR pricing. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More than 400 TfL staff earn £100k, figures reveal | London Transport | |||
Oyster top-up increased to ukp8 | London Transport | |||
TfL Staff/Bus Operator Passes | London Transport | |||
Prepay on national rail/staff pass | London Transport | |||
Over 60's bus pass validity in London | London Transport |