Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Network Rail asked to reign in costs for Imperial Wharf station
http://www.builderandengineer.co.uk/...ation-880.html Wednesday, 17 October 2007 Hammersmith and Fulham Council is calling on Network Rail to rein in its spiralling costs to oversee the construction of the long awaited station at Imperial Wharf in Fulham. The council wants Network Rail to pay the £1.4m shortfall out of its contingency finds. Hammersmith & Fulham Council (H&F) working with Kensington & Chelsea Council, Tfl and developers St.George, had a funding package agreed in the summer that would have meant the station got a green light but just as progress looked likely Network Rail's construction and project management fees increased. The total cost of building the station is now £7.93m - more than four times the original £1.75m cost which was first mooted in the late 1990s. H&F Council deputy leader and cabinet member for Environment, Cllr Nicholas Botterill, said: "We have gone as far as we can in terms of financing the building of this station and we are asking Network Rail to pay for the last £1.4m of this £8m project. Failure is not an option as local business, residents and commuters are desperate for the station to be completed as soon as possible." The proposed station will be built north of the West London Line railway bridge over the River Thames. The station will serve the Townmead Road and Lots Road areas of Fulham and Chelsea, with the recent and proposed developments of Imperial Wharf, Chelsea Harbour and Lots Road Power Station. Originally scheduled to open last month, it is now not known when the station will be completed unquote |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 18, 9:29�am, Mwmbwls wrote:
Network Rail asked to reign in costs for Imperial Wharf station http://www.builderandengineer.co.uk/...k-rail-asked-t... Wednesday, 17 October 2007 Hammersmith and Fulham Council is calling on Network Rail to rein in its spiralling costs to oversee the construction of the long awaited station at Imperial Wharf in Fulham. The council wants Network Rail to pay the £1.4m shortfall out of its contingency finds. Hammersmith & Fulham Council (H&F) working with Kensington & Chelsea Council, Tfl and developers St.George, had a funding package agreed in the summer that would have meant the station got a green light but just as progress looked likely Network Rail's construction and project management fees increased. The total cost of building the station is now £7.93m - more than four times the original £1.75m cost which was first mooted in the late 1990s. H&F Council deputy leader and cabinet member for Environment, Cllr Nicholas Botterill, said: "We have gone as far as we can in terms of financing the building of this station and we are asking Network Rail to pay for the last £1.4m of this £8m project. Failure is not an option as local business, residents and commuters are desperate for the station to be completed as soon as possible." The proposed station will be built north of the West London Line railway bridge over the River Thames. The station will serve the Townmead Road and Lots Road areas of Fulham and Chelsea, with the recent and proposed developments of Imperial Wharf, Chelsea Harbour and Lots Road Power Station. Originally scheduled to open last month, it is now not known when the station will be completed unquote The local newspaper in Fulham stated, a few months ago, that the St. George developers of Imperial Wharf (on the Western side of the railway) had breached planning consent by building many more apartments than had been agreed. Consequently, London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham felt it was in a strong position to screw out of them the "extra" money needed to build the much-fabled railway station. Needless to say the moronic Tory Council (which I admit to having voted for - only in the hope of getting rid of the thoroughly incompetent and dishonest Labour lot, last year) is too busy closing the borough best primary school (Peterborough School, of which I am an Old Boy and former Governor) to try and extract the money for the station that was PROMISED by the developers many years ago. In fact, the then Council had, as I recall, a condition that the station would have to be up and running before Phase II of Imperial Wharf could begin! It seems that a combination of dishonest money-making developers, dishonest and incompetent local government and total indifference by Railtrack and the train operators will ensure that this station remains a pipe-dream. As I stated it would when I addressed the local residents' meeting on the subject all those years ago. Marc. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Imperial Wharf | London Transport | |||
Imperial Echoes - krypticism | London Transport | |||
Hayes & Harlington Station - metric v.v. imperial measurements? | London Transport | |||
What is the Exact route of Crossrail between Canary Wharf & Customs House | London Transport | |||
Canary Wharf Jubilee Line Station - eastern exits | London Transport |