Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ar" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:00:55 +0000, Ar scribed: I'd rather see the city as you ride through it, then tunnels. The new Eurostar route is about as interesting as catching some overground trains from Brussels Zuid, southbound. I meant northbound of course! The Eurostar comes from the south into Brussels. Anyway, for visually unintersting bordom, I think this persons video just about sums up the new Eurostar route. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=A0GRF6d8EAg But this is not the Channel Tunnel (the 2nd one) but, it has a 373 going through it. Which tunnel is it? http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=sf7n_pOzFY4 KW |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Nov, 21:19, "Ken Ward" wrote:
"Ar" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:00:55 +0000, Ar scribed: I'd rather see the city as you ride through it, then tunnels. The new Eurostar route is about as interesting as catching some overground trains from Brussels Zuid, southbound. I meant northbound of course! The Eurostar comes from the south into Brussels. Anyway, for visually unintersting bordom, I think this persons video just about sums up the new Eurostar route. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=A0GRF6d8EAg But this is not the Channel Tunnel (the 2nd one) but, it has a 373 going through it. Which tunnel is it? http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=sf7n_pOzFY4 KW It's a so-called GNERstar, exiting a tunnel at Hadley Wood? Though perhaps not. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:19:58 GMT, "Ken Ward"
wrote: "Ar" wrote in message . .. On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:00:55 +0000, Ar scribed: I'd rather see the city as you ride through it, then tunnels. The new Eurostar route is about as interesting as catching some overground trains from Brussels Zuid, southbound. I meant northbound of course! The Eurostar comes from the south into Brussels. Anyway, for visually unintersting bordom, I think this persons video just about sums up the new Eurostar route. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=A0GRF6d8EAg But this is not the Channel Tunnel (the 2nd one) but, it has a 373 going through it. Which tunnel is it? http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=sf7n_pOzFY4 Hadley Wood? KW |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Am Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:31:15 UTC, schrieb "Peter Masson"
auf uk.railway : Southfleet Junction to Fawkham Junction and the Linford Street curve are the two sections where it will no longer be possible to travel by train at all. Why that? Why shouldn't it be possible to use the Southfleet Junction to Fawkham Junction link any more? Curious, L.W. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mizter T" wrote in message ups.com... Today is the last day of Eurostar trains traversing the tracks of south London heading for Waterloo, as tomorrow they'll switch to using the new, boring route through the new CTRL tunnels underneath east London (apols for rolling that pun out for the hundredth time). I felt a little ode to their passing - or indeed imminent lack of passing - was in order. The new route will no longer afford arriving passengers a window, however brief and partial it may be, across London. So Eurostar passengers will be denied any glimpse of the metropolis into which they are arriving until they emerge just before St. Pancras station (where they'll get a good vie of a cement works!). Excellent journalism snipped. You should apply to the BBC. In their well researched article about the move I found: "Waterloo's award-winning terminal is expected to be used to take the burden off existing services to Surrey." Compared to the DfT view reported lower down in the same article: "We're also looking at how Waterloo can be used to expand capacity right across the South Western franchise." They don't see very far from their Ivory Towers do they... Paul S |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Am Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:19:58 UTC, schrieb "Ken Ward"
auf uk.railway : But this is not the Channel Tunnel (the 2nd one) but, it has a 373 going through it. Which tunnel is it? http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=sf7n_pOzFY4 How about Hadleywood? see http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=NPUae4pxPeQ Cheers, L.W. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 21:19:58 on
Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Ken Ward remarked: But this is not the Channel Tunnel (the 2nd one) but, it has a 373 going through it. Which tunnel is it? http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=sf7n_pOzFY4 GNER trains, and a station by the tunnel mouth - Hadley Wood? -- Roland Perry |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
Ar wrote: On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:26:59 -0800, sweek scribed: The original plans were to build a tunnel to Waterloo and keep that as the terminal, but I think it was the borough of Lewisham that didn't want that, which resulted in the current north London route. If you remember where you got that info from I'd appreciate it. Never heard of one borough objecting, but then again, it was a Labour borough at the time. One story that went around was that the tories tried to route the CTRL through safe labour seats on the grounds that it was better to annoy people who weren't going to vote for you anyway. -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lüko Willms" wrote in message ... Am Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:19:58 UTC, schrieb "Ken Ward" auf uk.railway : But this is not the Channel Tunnel (the 2nd one) but, it has a 373 going through it. Which tunnel is it? http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=sf7n_pOzFY4 How about Hadleywood? see http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=NPUae4pxPeQ Much better video, with a good soundtrack. KW |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lüko Willms" wrote Why that? Why shouldn't it be possible to use the Southfleet Junction to Fawkham Junction link any more? There won't be any booked trains. After they take the shoes off the E*s the only trains which will be physically capable of using it (dual voltage and HS1 signalling) will be the Southeastern 395s (Javelin/Hitachi/Bullet according to preference) and Southeastern have no plans to use the route. It's likely to be lifted, though it is also likely to remain in railway ownership - AIUI the high voltage feeder cable to Fawkham substation runs along it. Most of it is the route of the former Gravesend West branch, closed to passengers in the early 1950s, though freight ran to Gravesend West until the mid 1960s, and coal as far as Southfleet for the Northfleet cement works until 1974. IIRC the track for this was not actually lifted until work began to rebuild the line for E*s. There is a slight deviation at the Fawkham Junction end, ostensibly to ease the curve so that Es could take the junction and the curve at 65 mph. Peter |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
South London sympathy (was Farewell to the 36 RMs) | London Transport | |||
Farewell to the 36 RMs | London Transport | |||
Farewell to the 36 RMs | London Transport | |||
Farewell to the 36 RMs | London Transport | |||
Sad day for London and farewell to faithful friends | London Transport |