Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:55:04 -0000, John Rowland
wrote: Speaking of which, could someone who is knowledgeable of both Hampstead and Kiev please fix the depth references on this page... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hampstead_tube_station I've deleted the whole 'World Record' claim, because the sums just don't add up. -- Fig |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Tim Roll-Pickering wrote:
wrote: And if Ken gets his way and begins to take on a range of other NR services, I think colour coding by terminal would keep things clear. This is what happens on the Parisian map, I think. The thin black tramlines could be kept for longer distance stopping services. How workable is that for lines that potentially serve three or more different terminals? (e.g. Epsom to Ashtead which Livingstone seems to want to get his claws into.) Seems to work for Barking to Aldgate East, Paddington to Baker Street, etc. I looked into this when i was planning my map, although i can't lay my hands on the post now, and i'm pretty sure there are no lines in London with more than three termini at the end. I think there might even be only one with three or something. Bear in mind that i count London Bridge, Charing Cross and Cannon Street as one terminus! tom -- The whole of science is nothing more than a refinement of everyday thinking. -- Albert Einstein |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23 Nov, 18:56, Tom Anderson wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, wrote: On Nov 23, 2:34 pm, "Richard J." wrote: wrote: And if Ken gets his way and begins to take on a range of other NR services, I think colour coding by terminal would keep things clear. This is what happens on the Parisian map, I think. The thin black tramlines could be kept for longer distance stopping services. It's the RATP's Ile-de-France map that's like that, with a different colour for the lines feeding into Gares du Nord, de l'Est, de Lyon, Montparnasse, and St-Lazare. It also manages to fit in on one map, with all stations marked, the RER lines, the Métro and the tram routes, plus the boundaries of the 8 zones. And a night bus map for Paris. And then there's the back of the map ... Exactly. That's what I want. Tom, you got that? Won't take you too long, will it? Oh, a matter of moments. I'm going to eat some tinned spaghetti and a packet of skittles, puke on a sheet of A3, and post a photo of it. tom LOROL! |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:56:34 +0000, Tom Anderson
wrote: [map production] Oh, a matter of moments. I'm going to eat some tinned spaghetti and a packet of skittles, puke on a sheet of A3, and post a photo of it. I could send you a plate of lamb and apricot curry if that would assist with the creative process?! -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland wrote:
Richard J. wrote: wrote: As Innes Ferguson, TFL design director said at the LT Museum on 24/9/7, the "Overground" brand made [sense] since as "you wouldn't expect to see 'Underground' on a roundel outside a station in Brighton". Nor would you at Amersham, 147 m (490 ft) above sea level, but people seem to have accepted it for many years. ? It was an example of a station with surface-level platforms so far above sea level that that being on the "Underground" is arguably more bizarre than Brighton being similarly branded. All "Underground" stations have surface buildings which are above sea level, AFAIK. Regent's Park and Notting Hill Gate have no surface buildings. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Richard J. wrote:
John Rowland wrote: All "Underground" stations have surface buildings which are above sea level, AFAIK. Regent's Park and Notting Hill Gate have no surface buildings. Hyde Park Corner too, isn't it? tom -- We want to make this easy but if you don't understand how this works, you have no business controlling the fate of the internet. -- web2.0validator.com |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:56:34 +0000, Tom Anderson wrote: [map production] Oh, a matter of moments. I'm going to eat some tinned spaghetti and a packet of skittles, puke on a sheet of A3, and post a photo of it. I could send you a plate of lamb and apricot curry if that would assist with the creative process?! Considering the colours, might be more appropriate for doing a London Overground map. tom -- We want to make this easy but if you don't understand how this works, you have no business controlling the fate of the internet. -- web2.0validator.com |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 24-Nov-2007, Tom Anderson wrote: Regent's Park and Notting Hill Gate have no surface buildings. Hyde Park Corner too, isn't it? + Warwick Avenue |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Paul Corfield
writes [map production] Oh, a matter of moments. I'm going to eat some tinned spaghetti and a packet of skittles, puke on a sheet of A3, and post a photo of it. I could send you a plate of lamb and apricot curry if that would assist with the creative process?! Mmmm, lamb and apricot curry. That sounds good, you been at that cook book again, Paul? -- Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building. You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK (please use the reply to address for email) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
1915 plan to rename German road names in London | London Transport | |||
Changing railstation names | London Transport | |||
Station names | London Transport | |||
DLR Station Names Orgins? | London Transport | |||
DLR Station Names Origins? | London Transport |