Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:26:59 GMT, "Richard J."
wrote: It was an example of a station with surface-level platforms so far above sea level that that being on the "Underground" is arguably more bizarre than Brighton being similarly branded. In Hamburg, there is a section (Roedingsmarkt-Rathaus, roughly) where the U-bahn is elevated about 5m above the ground, and the S-Bahn is underground... Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil Williams wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:26:59 GMT, "Richard J." wrote: It was an example of a station with surface-level platforms so far above sea level that that being on the "Underground" is arguably more bizarre than Brighton being similarly branded. In Hamburg, there is a section (Roedingsmarkt-Rathaus, roughly) where the U-bahn is elevated about 5m above the ground, and the S-Bahn is underground... AFIAK, U-bahns are controlled by the city government and S-bahns are controlled by the federal government, and there is no particular reason why an entire U-line couldn't be overground or an entire S-line be underground, although the latter is particularly unlikely. At Stratford station the Overground platforms are downstairs from the Underground platforms. |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:37:40 -0000, "John Rowland"
wrote: AFIAK, U-bahns are controlled by the city government and S-bahns are controlled by the federal government, and there is no particular reason why an entire U-line couldn't be overground or an entire S-line be underground, although the latter is particularly unlikely. Oh, I don't think there's anything that says you can't, just as there's nothing saying you can't have a LUL line mostly not underground! Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:26:59 GMT, Richard J. wrote:
As Innes Ferguson, TFL design director said at the LT Museum on 24/9/7, the "Overground" brand made [sense] since as "you wouldn't expect to see 'Underground' on a roundel outside a station in Brighton". Nor would you at Amersham, 147 m (490 ft) above sea level, but people seem to have accepted it for many years. ? It was an example of a station with surface-level platforms so far above sea level that that being on the "Underground" is arguably more bizarre than Brighton being similarly branded. Where does sea level come into it? Surely "underground" just means below ground level, regardless of how far that is above (or indeed below) sea level. |
#55
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 01:09:34 +0000, Tom Anderson wrote:
All "Underground" stations have surface buildings which are above sea level, AFAIK. Regent's Park and Notting Hill Gate have no surface buildings. Hyde Park Corner too, isn't it? Yes, there are several. (Off the top of my head: Tottenham Court Road Old Street Piccadilly Circus, unless you count Trocadero I can't mentally place surface buildings at Mansion House or Bank either, but I'm not too sure about those.) |
#56
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:44:48 +0000, Steve Fitzgerald ]
wrote: In message , Paul Corfield writes [map production] Oh, a matter of moments. I'm going to eat some tinned spaghetti and a packet of skittles, puke on a sheet of A3, and post a photo of it. I could send you a plate of lamb and apricot curry if that would assist with the creative process?! Mmmm, lamb and apricot curry. That sounds good, you been at that cook book again, Paul? this recipe http://uktv.co.uk/food/recipe/aid/591450 very nice and easy to make. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#57
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, John Rowland wrote:
Neil Williams wrote: On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:26:59 GMT, "Richard J." wrote: It was an example of a station with surface-level platforms so far above sea level that that being on the "Underground" is arguably more bizarre than Brighton being similarly branded. In Hamburg, there is a section (Roedingsmarkt-Rathaus, roughly) where the U-bahn is elevated about 5m above the ground, and the S-Bahn is underground... AFIAK, U-bahns are controlled by the city government and S-bahns are controlled by the federal government, and there is no particular reason why an entire U-line couldn't be overground or an entire S-line be underground, although the latter is particularly unlikely. At Stratford station the Overground platforms are downstairs from the Underground platforms. Willesden Junction has Overground and Underground on the same tracks. Er, with more Overground on top of them ... What does the NLL do at Stratford now? That used to have the Underground, in the form of the Central line, on top of the Overground (although it wasn't called that at the time!); then they added another bit of Underground at the lower level (the Jubilee), and have now possibly rerouted the Overground to the higher level. And of course there's overground-with-a-small-o at the higher level, and at some point there'll be DLR at both or something, i don't know. No plans to add yet another underground line on top of the existing high level platforms that i know of, sadly! tom -- Beware! Inside pie, there are chickens, gamecubes, Moltres, Raichu, and bacteria(in a good way!) -- Wikipedia |
#58
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 20:37:04 +0000, Tom Anderson
wrote: What does the NLL do at Stratford now? What it has always done - have platforms adjacent to the Jubilee Line. The new upper level platforms near platform 12 are under construction. There are full details in the new Modern Railways (Dec 2007) -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#59
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 24, 3:28 pm, asdf wrote:
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 01:09:34 +0000, Tom Anderson wrote: All "Underground" stations have surface buildings which are above sea level, AFAIK. Regent's Park and Notting Hill Gate have no surface buildings. Hyde Park Corner too, isn't it? Yes, there are several. (Off the top of my head: Tottenham Court Road Tottenham Court Road has a building over the exit at the corner of Oxford Street and Charing Cross Road. It only covers the stairs though. See the picture on the wiki entry at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tottenh...d_tube_station The original ticket hall was around this point too. |
#60
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Corfield" wrote in message ... On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 20:37:04 +0000, Tom Anderson wrote: What does the NLL do at Stratford now? What it has always done - have platforms adjacent to the Jubilee Line. The new upper level platforms near platform 12 are under construction. There are full details in the new Modern Railways (Dec 2007) To add to what Paul C has said, they still use both platforms most of the day, the trains arriving in platform 2, then doing a shunt move down the line to the south and then returning into platform 1 for departure. There are a few exceptions to this in the early morning IIRC. That Modern Railway drawing seems to have got its arrows and descriptions a bit out of kilter though, the drawings on the TfL projects site are much more readable... Paul S |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
1915 plan to rename German road names in London | London Transport | |||
Changing railstation names | London Transport | |||
Station names | London Transport | |||
DLR Station Names Orgins? | London Transport | |||
DLR Station Names Origins? | London Transport |