Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim Roll-Pickering" wrote in message ... Paul Scott wrote: Also the track & platform layout is a mess - it's not possible to have a through service switching between lines that stops at Gospel Oak. Expect if through services off Goblin towards WJ ever happen (and it is in one of the proposals), the bay will be closed and at least one platform moved onto the westbound through line, possibly platforms on both lines... Is it viable to make the through NLL platforms the reversing point for GOBLIN trains? Whilst I can see a through service happening, I'd be sceptical if it were for all services. And do the track connections actually allow the GOBLIN to switch to the NLL east of the platforms? My recollection is that they don't physically connect at all on that side. Don't forget the NLL platforms are curving round to the south as the NLL leaves Gospel Oak eastbound, there woul be significant new track & embankment works to get over from the Goblin and line up with the NLL with a reasonable curve. It would also add two more unnecessary flat junctions in the area, which is a bit of a negative when trying to increase passenger frequencies while allowing for existing freight. Two new platforms is probably the easiest solution really, and Google Earth seems to show bags of room for them... Paul |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lack of trains on the drain | London Transport | |||
Sudbury Hill (Harrow) lack of information | London Transport | |||
FGW Link excels even Thames Strains at public safety (lack of ...) | London Transport | |||
Lack of road markings in Kensington & Chelsea | London Transport | |||
Thameslink ticket checks - or lack of! | London Transport |