London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 9th 07, 08:42 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 44
Default St P.I..L.L Impressions.

TL commmuters are used to using their phones in KXTL (and Farringdon)
so will not be happy.

Well I will be happy - not having to put up with their (most of the time)
pointless conversations that could easily wait.

  #2   Report Post  
Old December 9th 07, 01:02 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2007
Posts: 32
Default St P.I..L.L Impressions.

At 11:48:40 on Sun, 9 Dec 2007 Peter Lawrence opined:-

First impressions of the Thameslink platforms at St Pancras which opened
on time this morning (after what must have been a massive tidy-up
operation).

Spacious platforms, clean and well lit but not inspiring and, as yet,
minimal advertising. Signs and indicators matching the those rest of
St.P.I. The train indicators do show intermediate stations (ref
earlier comment here.) Seats only at the outer ends of the platforms,
probably not enough of them, particularly since half of them will be off
the end of 4 coach trains.


That at least is better than St P I, which has NO seats.
--
Thoss
  #3   Report Post  
Old December 9th 07, 01:38 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default St P.I..L.L Impressions.

In message , at 11:48:40 on
Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Peter Lawrence remarked:

Seats only at the outer ends of the platforms, probably not enough of
them


Whoever designed that aspect of StP (was it the architect we saw
agonising over small details on TV, or someone else) has clearly got an
aversion to seating.

Delayed commuters will be frustrated since, as might be expected,
mobile phones do not work on the platforms (does the technology exist
to fix this?).


Of course. The HEx tunnels have continuous coverage, or they could fit
some microcells for just the platforms. However, they don't even seem to
have wifi in the main shed yet. Another blind spot from the architects?
--
Roland Perry
  #4   Report Post  
Old December 9th 07, 01:47 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,796
Default St P.I..L.L Impressions.

On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 14:38:28 +0000, Roland Perry
wrote:

Whoever designed that aspect of StP (was it the architect we saw
agonising over small details on TV, or someone else) has clearly got an
aversion to seating.


Same as Euston[1], then? Maybe it was intentional to encourage
business for the shops and bars. Mind you, Blackhole isn't exactly
well-endowed with seating, bar that almost-floor-level bar that people
tend to sit on on the platforms.

[1] I am a big fan of Euston as a very practical station, if not
anything like as beautiful as St. P. However, it has two very bad
design features. One is the lack of seating, and the other is the
lack of a marked-out (perhaps with railings) area in which passengers
should *not* stand and wait on the concourse, which means that getting
to the suburban platforms in the peak can be a slow affair.

Neil

--
Neil Williams
Put my first name before the at to reply.
  #5   Report Post  
Old December 9th 07, 03:29 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default St P.I..L.L Impressions.

In message , at 14:47:34 on Sun,
9 Dec 2007, Neil Williams remarked:

Whoever designed that aspect of StP (was it the architect we saw
agonising over small details on TV, or someone else) has clearly got an
aversion to seating.


Same as Euston[1], then? Maybe it was intentional to encourage
business for the shops and bars.


When MML was using the Kent platforms as interim-platform, there was
almost a sensible amount of seating near the buffers. But now it's as
bad as KX (which does have seats around the perimeter of the 1970's
concourse, but they are always full). On the other hand, the KX Suburban
platforms have plenty of seating on them.

If the lack of seating is a "feature" then they haven't provided any
useful seating within catering establishments anywhere near the MML
platforms.
--
Roland Perry


  #6   Report Post  
Old December 9th 07, 06:04 PM posted to uk.railway, uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,346
Default St P.I..L.L Impressions.

On Dec 9, 2:38 pm, Roland Perry wrote:
Of course. The HEx tunnels have continuous coverage, or they could fit
some microcells for just the platforms. However, they don't even seem to
have wifi in the main shed yet. Another blind spot from the architects?


Who cares about wifi in a railway station? Can't people find something
better to do with their time than surf the internet while they wait
for a train? Any business serfs who need to be online all the time
will have their corporate crackberry anyway.

B2003
  #7   Report Post  
Old December 9th 07, 06:38 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default St P.I..L.L Impressions.

In message
, at
11:04:28 on Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Boltar remarked:
Of course. The HEx tunnels have continuous coverage, or they could fit
some microcells for just the platforms. However, they don't even seem to
have wifi in the main shed yet. Another blind spot from the architects?


Who cares about wifi in a railway station? Can't people find something
better to do with their time than surf the internet while they wait
for a train?


What is there better to do (remembering that usenet access is an
important ingredient of Internet Access)?

Let alone all those people who say a major reason for using a train
(instead of driving) is because you can work. My work arrives by
Internet.

Any business serfs who need to be online all the time will have their
corporate crackberry anyway.


Kiddy toys. I need proper Internet access.
--
Roland Perry
  #8   Report Post  
Old December 9th 07, 11:21 PM posted to uk.railway, uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 35
Default St P.I..L.L Impressions.

On 9 Dec, 19:38, Roland Perry wrote:

Kiddy toys. I need proper Internet access.


Well, the new BlackBerry models now have 1) A proper web browser and
2) Wi-Fi... so these users will want fast, cheap Internet access too.

Personally, I use HSDPA to get 3.6 (or soon 7.2Mbps) for myself - but
Wi-Fi still has its place. StP will be getting it, but it seems to
have been delayed.

Jonathan
  #9   Report Post  
Old December 10th 07, 12:54 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default St P.I..L.L Impressions.

In message
, at
16:21:57 on Sun, 9 Dec 2007, jonmorris
remarked:
Kiddy toys. I need proper Internet access.


Well, the new BlackBerry models now have 1) A proper web browser and
2) Wi-Fi... so these users will want fast, cheap Internet access too.


And the iPhone will also pick up wifi, iirc.

(As for Blackberry style access, I want to be able to work on my laptop,
not browse a sunset of my email with the aid of a magnifying glass. I
used something a bit like a Blackberry a long time ago, and it
definitely has its place, although not scalable to my current
requirements).
--
Roland Perry
  #10   Report Post  
Old December 10th 07, 08:46 AM posted to uk.railway, uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,346
Default St P.I..L.L Impressions.

On Dec 9, 7:38 pm, Roland Perry wrote:
In message
, at
11:04:28 on Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Boltar remarked:

Of course. The HEx tunnels have continuous coverage, or they could fit
some microcells for just the platforms. However, they don't even seem to
have wifi in the main shed yet. Another blind spot from the architects?


Who cares about wifi in a railway station? Can't people find something
better to do with their time than surf the internet while they wait
for a train?


What is there better to do (remembering that usenet access is an
important ingredient of Internet Access)?


Read a book , read a paper, sleep...


Let alone all those people who say a major reason for using a train
(instead of driving) is because you can work. My work arrives by
Internet.


You have my sympathies. When I leave the office the job stays behind
and I go back to my real life.

B2003


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LUL Movia S stock impressions G1206 London Transport 4 December 24th 10 10:35 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017