Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, R.C. Payne wrote:
Tom Anderson wrote: On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, wrote: On Dec 11, 8:31 am, PhilD wrote: On Dec 10, 11:48 pm, "John Rowland" wrote: Is there a good reason for them to be different? Won't various signs and conduit friezes have to be replaced as a result of the colour change which could otherwise have been left alone? My guess is that they wanted something sufficiently different to indicate different services, but sufficiently similar to merge them at a later date. I think there's a case for keeping them seperate. The use of shades of orange suggests they're part of the same network, but it would ensure that noone would believe they can get a direct train from, say, New Cross to Hampstead Heath. I take your point. ISTR a map (drawn by J. Rowland?) which put the Wimbleware service in a different shade of green to the rest of the District to make it clear that there were no Richmond - Edgware Road trains. You could do something similar with the Metropolitan. Moreover, the current map suggests you can get a train from Clapham Junction to Stratford via Willesden Junction; you cannot. However, i think all of these limitations can be shown by layout, without using colour - as recent maps have done for the Wimbleware, and do for the Overground at Gospel Oak. The current map [1] makes the Wimbleware service fairly clear, Yes, that was my point. though I can see a case for marking it out as a separate line, H&C style. One of the problems with the Underground map is that it is well suited to tube lines, where services are really very distinct from one another, but it is less good for subsurface and overground services where there is not a one line to one track type of segregation. See my strenuous remarks in the threads we've had about colouring the London Connections map - i think the situation isn't quite as bad as you might think. Worse than the tube, but not a dead loss. I also don't like the wheelchair symbol. I don't object to the idea of showing stair free stations, and I can't think of a better idea for how to do it, but that doesn't stop me from not liking it. I agree. The problem is that it's a circle, which implies interchange. Could they not just have plonked a little wheelchair icon next to the station tick? Or put it in the middle of the circle for actual interchanges. tom -- Intensive Erfrischung |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Heathrow's new Terminal 2 opened this morning | London Transport | |||
DLR Canning Town Stratford International - still not opened ... | London Transport | |||
BBC: Doors opened on moving Victoria Line Tube near Brixton | London Transport | |||
Which railway line would you like to see re-opened if money wasno object? | London Transport | |||
New motorway opened in Cricklewood | London Transport |