Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 14, 10:51 pm, "Peter Masson" wrote:
"Dan G" wrote I live in Reading and I don't want Crossrail to come here. Why? Because Crossrail will be a stopper service. I want to catch an HST to Paddington, overtaking the slow Crossrail trains past Maidenhead, and then change for the ride into central London (or beyond). Taking it all the way to Reading would increase the already sky-high cost and take away capacity for other, more useful, trains for Reading. If Crossrail is extended to Reading the Main (Fast) Lines will still be available for 125 mph trains running non-stop (or possibly calling at Slough) between Paddington and Reading. But if it terminates at Maidenhead how are London to Twyford/Henley passengers to be catered for, or passengers travelling to Reading from intermediate stations? Will there be a Paddington - Reading stopping service sandwiched between Crossrail trains (using capacity which really ought to be kept for freight)? Or will passengers have to use Crossrail, and change at Slough or Maidenhead for a shuttle service? Or will Main Line capacity be used up with 90 mph trains calling at Slough, Maidenhead and Twyford (perhaps crossing to the Relief Lines at Dolphin, Maidenhead East or Ruscombe once the Crossrail service has thinned out - and the crossing move eats capacity)? While Crossrail can be justified as a stopping service within Greater London, as Acton Main Line and Hanwell would undoubtedly get much more use if they had a decent service) stopping all Maidenhead trains at Iver and Taplow is daft, as in population terms these two stations at least are in the middle of nowhere. The argument that saddling Crossrail with the cost of rebuilding and resignalling Reading would make Crossrail unaffordable is sound, but the argument that even if these necessary improvements are funded separately, as they will be, Crossrail still can't go there is weak. However, it has to be realised that although Reading is only two stations further than Maidenhead it is actually half as far again as Paddington to Maidenhead. Peter Its called piecemeal enchroachment or piecemeal development. Its what the Government is good at - as witnessed at Heathrow. Of course they'll build Crossrail to/from Maidenhead - at first. But then later they'll extend it to Reading and further to the East and South East. Like at Heathrow with T4, then widening the M25, then T5, then Airtrack, then the Third Runway and T6, etc., there would be no way of getting planning permission for just one really mega-project. So each project gets planning permission one at a time during which further development is always denied. Then when that project is up and running, the next one - even though emphatically denied - is started. Haven't you heard of the BAA (wholy privately owned by Spanish property demolition and development company Ferrovial) with its lies, damned lies, statistics, and emphatic denials? Crossrail is just the same. CJB. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crossrail consultation at that church round the back of Centrepoint | London Transport | |||
Calendar of Strikes | London Transport | |||
Omg! Yet more strikes | London Transport | |||
The possible 'lager' strikes | London Transport | |||
London's Flash Mob Strikes Again!! | London Transport |