Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Dec, 17:08, solar penguin wrote:
On 14 Dec, 13:05, Mizter T wrote: So it is at Denmark Hill where I'd expect the loss of a direct service to London Bridge will be felt most acutely, and also where the voices of opposition will be the loudest. And don't forget Denmark Hill also has direct train services to Elephant & Castle and Blackfriars. Yes, but whilst I'm always keen to suggest people should be a bit less averse to utilising Shank's pony, Blackfriars and London Bridge are nonetheless in somewhat different necks of the wood (and Blackfriars isn't really any good for access to Guy's Hospital). Plus of course the benefit of London Bridge is the wide range of interchange opportunities it offers. Elephant & Castle does indeed offer an interchange of sorts with the Northern and Bakerloo lines - but it's a pretty clunky interchange. Denmark Hill to London Bridge via Elephant & Castle is not a route I'd particularly recommend - in particular going southbound, as one would have to hit the half-hourly train from E&C to Denmark Hill (the Blackfriars - Sevenoaks service). The preferable rail route to LB would be via a change at Peckham Rye or Queens Road Peckham. What I haven't got my head round is the exact reasoning behind the South London Line being chucked out of London Bridge. I guess it occupies a valuable platform, which is space that is much needed. I'm unclear as to whether this space is needed permanently for Thameslink '2000' or whether it is just needed for the duration of construction works... I thought it was the latter, but perhaps it's the former. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mizter T wrote:
On 14 Dec, 17:08, solar penguin wrote: On 14 Dec, 13:05, Mizter T wrote: So it is at Denmark Hill where I'd expect the loss of a direct service to London Bridge will be felt most acutely, and also where the voices of opposition will be the loudest. And don't forget Denmark Hill also has direct train services to Elephant & Castle and Blackfriars. Yes, but whilst I'm always keen to suggest people should be a bit less averse to utilising Shank's pony, Blackfriars and London Bridge are nonetheless in somewhat different necks of the wood (and Blackfriars isn't really any good for access to Guy's Hospital). Plus of course the benefit of London Bridge is the wide range of interchange opportunities it offers. Elephant & Castle does indeed offer an interchange of sorts with the Northern and Bakerloo lines - but it's a pretty clunky interchange. Denmark Hill to London Bridge via Elephant & Castle is not a route I'd particularly recommend - in particular going southbound, as one would have to hit the half-hourly train from E&C to Denmark Hill (the Blackfriars - Sevenoaks service). The preferable rail route to LB would be via a change at Peckham Rye or Queens Road Peckham. What I haven't got my head round is the exact reasoning behind the South London Line being chucked out of London Bridge. I guess it occupies a valuable platform, which is space that is much needed. I'm unclear as to whether this space is needed permanently for Thameslink '2000' or whether it is just needed for the duration of construction works... I thought it was the latter, but perhaps it's the former. The rebuilt London bridge will have fewer terminal platforms in favour of more through platforms. Dave |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Dec, 18:57, Dave A wrote:
Mizter T wrote: (snip) What I haven't got my head round is the exact reasoning behind the South London Line being chucked out of London Bridge. I guess it occupies a valuable platform, which is space that is much needed. I'm unclear as to whether this space is needed permanently for Thameslink '2000' or whether it is just needed for the duration of construction works... I thought it was the latter, but perhaps it's the former. The rebuilt London bridge will have fewer terminal platforms in favour of more through platforms. Dave I presumed it would be something like that - indeed if I'd just read your website's entry on the Thameslink Programme... http://www.alwaystouchout.com/project/23 ....I'd have known that the London Bridge redevelopment masterplan "involves increasing the number of through platforms from 6 to 9, and decreasing the number of terminating platforms from 9 to 6." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New LO in car line diagram for ELLX Phase 2 | London Transport | |||
ELLX phase 2 | London Transport | |||
ELLX phase 2 | London Transport | |||
Crossrail & ELLX going ahead | London Transport |