Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22 Jan, 10:18, Mwmbwls wrote:
On Jan 21, 9:14 pm, Jamie Thompson wrote: I was looking at the South London options for developing the network the other day, and it seems to me that the Hayes branch is pretty much the only option for the DLR, so it should probably go to that, with the Bakerloo going elsewhere, though going through Lewisham is probably still a good idea. I am not sure that the DLR would offer sufficient capacity down the Hayes corridor - the South of London RUS is now proposing 6 twelve car trains per hour in the peak. Plans for the original Fleet line to link Lewisham with Fenchurch Street were abandoned in 1977 and at that time an extension of the East London Line from New Cross to Lewisham and from Shoreditch to Liverpool Street were proposed instead. Thereafter long grass grew and memories faded. Under the current proposals, I have always felt that New Cross, like Elephant and Castle, is too close to the City to be a viable terminus and that an ELL phase 3 extension to relieve Lewisham, possibly going on to Hayes would be a good idea. It would at some point be necessary to tackle the four coach constraint limit on the Canada Water - Whitechapel section of the ELL but I believe that is going to be inevitable anyway sooner or later. The London Overground proposal already contains links to the "Not quite Outer Circle" core route from the east from Barking,and the north from Watford and suggestions were made for a western extension from Wimbledon to Clapham Junction. Linking the south east quadrant in a similar manner could be worth considering. Mwmbwls - "Renowned Builders of Castles in the Air to the Gentry" - our motto - "Everything will be fine until you try to move in." Interesting ideas, in particular the notion of the ELLX continuing from New Cross down to Hayes which I do quite like! I suppose one argument in favour of the terminus at New Cross is that during times of disruption on the Croydon/Crystal Palace 'branch' it would help to provide the rest of the line with a reliable, if degraded, service - and passengers from Southeastern services could still change onto it at New Cross. I'm not so sure of your certainty that ELLX trains are going to get much longer than four carriages. If Wapping and Rotherhithe were closed and with judicious use of SDO and perhaps some platform level works, perhaps six carriages might be possible - though without major works I'm not sure how feasible this would be. I don't know whether passive provision is being made at the new ELLX stations for longer trains. Of course whether the Hayes branch could get by with four car ELLX trains, even if they were just part of the mix, is questionable (as you implicitly seem to acknowledge). What's this ' "Not quite Outer Circle" core route from the east from Barking' of which you speak - it would involve taking c2c aka London, Tilbury and Southend trains up the so-called GOBLIN to Gospel Oak and beyond? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New LO in car line diagram for ELLX Phase 2 | London Transport | |||
ELLX phase 2 | London Transport | |||
ELLX phase 2 | London Transport | |||
Crossrail & ELLX going ahead | London Transport |