Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Arquati" wrote in message ... "tim" wrote in message ... "Dave Arquati" wrote in message ... Just seen this story online: http://makeashorterlink.com/?N5BE22DA5 When did this project surface and why haven't we heard anything about it before? Because you haven't been reading in the right place. These ideas for 'south to central london' trams have been around for a few (6 or more) months, though this particular route to the city looks new. I guess that something Ken has done is encouraging them. Well Cross River Transit from Peckham and Brixton to Camden and King's Cross I knew about since it's been around for ages and is well advanced. South *west* London to the centre is all new to me. A tram good idea? IMHO it's a stupid idea. If the routes are overground then they will get stuck in the traffic just like the buses and if they are underground the'll be prohibitively expensive. If a dedicated route is the solution then why not just build one for buses, it will be cheaper and much more flexible Tim See the Croydon tram. Dedicate the route to *trams* not buses and you have a high capacity, less polluting, more attractive route. 90% of this is on segregated, previously under-utilised, railway alignments. I don't see how it can be comparable? True... but isn't the principle of segregation the same whether its on old railway alignments or not? Segregate an on-road tram and its route still doesn't have any cars in it. The disadvantage on road is that there are more crossings and access problems; the advantage is that you can use the segregated portion for other public transport too, i.e. buses. We already have bus lanes so by a "dedicated route" I assume you mean something more than just a lane on the road. If you have a dedicated, generally traffic-free route for buses, and the buses are full up, it's an obvious next step to introduce trams since they are more attractive and higher capacity - you cater for the overcrowding as well as allowing for further growth, and even creating it since people are more likely to make a journey by tram than bus. Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cross River Transit Consultation | London Transport | |||
Cross-River Transit questions | London Transport | |||
Kings Cross development proposals and Cross River Tram Link | London Transport | |||
Do we need cross-river trams? (Long appendix) | London Transport | |||
Cross River Transit 2? | London Transport |