Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now we have talking buses - like the
Transdev's H98. This not only announces the next bus stop, but also stupid requests such as don't forget to take all your belongings with you, etc. Its almost as bad as the FGW buses stating the obvious such as 'the doors are now opening/closing.' It makes me want to turn my Walkman up really loud to stop hearing these inane and nanny state announcements. CJB. What a stupid comment to make. As any fool knows, the biggest inherant flaw that has always existed on bus travel is that someone travelling to a destination they have not been to before has no idea when or where the stop they require is, and relying on the driver to remember to tell you is unreasonable. Example: I know that a bus route passes a road that I want to go to, but on the bus I have no idea where it is other then, perhaps, a timetabled time. And if I ever did notice my destination, by the time I pressed the bell I would probably have missed it. The stupid announcements you may have a point with, but next stop announcements makes far more sense to have on Buses then on trains. Best Wishes, LEWIS |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:13:03 -0800 (PST), Mr Thant
wrote: On 17 Dec, 17:31, (Neil Williams) wrote: The version I've seen (on the 73 and 168) doesn't have any such announcements - its vocabulary is just a list of stops, the number and the destination. I do hope the rolled-out version doesn't have all the rubbish added. I've not heard any nagging either (on the 123). Oh a fellow 123 user. I have heard a range of announcements but only used sparingly. I know some people have been on buses where it seems a never ending stream of messages was allowed to run. I might not have the exact text correct below but they give the right flavour. The helpful extra messages on the 123 have been :- "Passengers cannot alight at the next stop as the stop is closed" - this was correct as the stop was oos due to roadworks. "Please move right down inside the bus" - this at a stop where the bus is often overloaded. "There are seats available on the upper deck" - played after the message just above as an encouragement for people to make space. "The Victoria Line service is suspended. Please choose an alternative route" - the line was suspended so this was good real time information. I was quite shocked to see a Tube reference on a bus. "Please do not play your music loudly" - this was out of context as the bus was silent at the time! "This bus is now being diverted" - used when the bus route was subject to a long diversion due to a traffic accident. I actually don't have an issue with these messages being used in context. They are helpful in terms of showing the driver is "managing" his bus or to help passengers cope with disruption on the transport system. I understand why people are fed up with lots of noise but I think the I-Bus concept is very good and will be a genuine aid to people given that the stop names tie up directly with names on bus stop flags and in the TfL Journey Planner. Once people can tie the three elements together to help them get about London then I think it will be seen as a boon. Now if only it was a bit more reliable - that's the problem with being the first garage (Tottenham) to trial the system. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() The version I've seen (on the 73 and 168) doesn't have any such announcements - its vocabulary is just a list of stops, the number and the destination. I do hope the rolled-out version doesn't have all the rubbish added. For the most part the announcements are good, and helpful to find a destination, and I'm all in favour of it. What bugs me is the "73 pause to pause Victoria" which is unnecessary (I wouldn't have got on if I didn't think it was a 73, and neither would a partially sighted person, surely), and also, shockingly badly done with the huge pauses. If it was one flowing statement, then it would be far less annoying. It's still far better than when someone presses the stop button, as well as the bing and the Stopping sign lighting up, getting "BUS stopping at NEXT bus stop, please stand well clear OF doors". Completely superfluous, and sounds as if it's putting together the statement from all the separate words in its system rather than having one phrase. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 19:31:06 on Mon, 17 Dec 2007 Paul Corfield opined:-
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:13:03 -0800 (PST), Mr Thant wrote: On 17 Dec, 17:31, (Neil Williams) wrote: The version I've seen (on the 73 and 168) doesn't have any such announcements - its vocabulary is just a list of stops, the number and the destination. I do hope the rolled-out version doesn't have all the rubbish added. I've not heard any nagging either (on the 123). Oh a fellow 123 user. I have heard a range of announcements but only used sparingly. I know some people have been on buses where it seems a never ending stream of messages was allowed to run. I might not have the exact text correct below but they give the right flavour. The helpful extra messages on the 123 have been :- "Passengers cannot alight at the next stop as the stop is closed" - this was correct as the stop was oos due to roadworks. "Please move right down inside the bus" - this at a stop where the bus is often overloaded. "There are seats available on the upper deck" - played after the message just above as an encouragement for people to make space. "The Victoria Line service is suspended. Please choose an alternative route" - the line was suspended so this was good real time information. I was quite shocked to see a Tube reference on a bus. "Please do not play your music loudly" - this was out of context as the bus was silent at the time! "This bus is now being diverted" - used when the bus route was subject to a long diversion due to a traffic accident. I actually don't have an issue with these messages being used in context. They are helpful in terms of showing the driver is "managing" his bus or to help passengers cope with disruption on the transport system. I understand why people are fed up with lots of noise but I think the I-Bus concept is very good and will be a genuine aid to people given that the stop names tie up directly with names on bus stop flags and in the TfL Journey Planner. Once people can tie the three elements together to help them get about London then I think it will be seen as a boon. Now if only it was a bit more reliable - that's the problem with being the first garage (Tottenham) to trial the system. How does the speech system work? On the 65s the spoken text was also displayed on a screen. Are they pre-recorded announcements, or is the text typed in and then processed by text-to-speech software? -- Thoss |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:31:06 +0000, Paul Corfield
wrote: "The Victoria Line service is suspended. Please choose an alternative route" - the line was suspended so this was good real time information. I was quite shocked to see a Tube reference on a bus. Now that is good. Perhaps an even better improvement for the future (which I've not seen on buses anywhere, but the Hamburg U-Bahn does have the feature) would be to allow the control room to take control of the PA of all or selected buses, and thus to announce connectional information like that? Presumably the information was sent to the driver via the radio then he pressed the button, but why not take out the middle man? Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:44:09 -0800 (PST), SamB
wrote: For the most part the announcements are good, and helpful to find a destination, and I'm all in favour of it. What bugs me is the "73 pause to pause Victoria" which is unnecessary (I wouldn't have got on if I didn't think it was a 73, and neither would a partially sighted person, surely), and also, shockingly badly done with the huge pauses. If it was one flowing statement, then it would be far less annoying. If you wanted to benefit partially-sighted people, it might make sense for a speaker to be fitted to the outside of the bus so they can hear it before they board. It's still far better than when someone presses the stop button, as well as the bing and the Stopping sign lighting up, getting "BUS stopping at NEXT bus stop, please stand well clear OF doors". Completely superfluous, and sounds as if it's putting together the statement from all the separate words in its system rather than having one phrase. And a piece of information, like the repetitive references to the doors on the Tube, that is quite easily summed up in one sound - "ding". Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Neil Williams
writes On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:31:06 +0000, Paul Corfield wrote: "The Victoria Line service is suspended. Please choose an alternative route" - the line was suspended so this was good real time information. I was quite shocked to see a Tube reference on a bus. Now that is good. Perhaps an even better improvement for the future (which I've not seen on buses anywhere, but the Hamburg U-Bahn does have the feature) would be to allow the control room to take control of the PA of all or selected buses, and thus to announce connectional information like that? Presumably the information was sent to the driver via the radio then he pressed the button, but why not take out the middle man? That system has been in place on the Tyne & Wear Metro since its inception (thought I've seldom heard it used and haven't travelled on it for a long time now). It's also used on the so-called C-Train in Calgary.......where I once heard it used to announce a local hockey team's win! -- Ian Jelf, MITG Birmingham, UK Registered Blue Badge Tourist Guide for London and the Heart of England http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:31:06 +0000, Paul Corfield
wrote: I understand why people are fed up with lots of noise but I think the I-Bus concept is very good and will be a genuine aid to people given that the stop names tie up directly with names on bus stop flags and in the TfL Journey Planner. Mostly. The TfL Journey Planner (at least the WAP one) calls the Tiffin Girls School stop (just outside Kingston on the 65) "Tiffin School for Girls" -- which isn't what the bus stop or, indeed, the school are called! I'm sure that's not the only anomaly around... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How fast-talking cyclist got away with 'jumping red light' - Daily Mail | London Transport | |||
Talking Trains | London Transport | |||
Talking Buses | London Transport |