Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I may, I'd like to recommend Mr Thants update to the Shepherds Bush
platform saga. Good cross sectional drawing of the infamous wall behind the northbound platform, explains the difficulty of moving it, and showing the lights bracketed off the wall, as previously suggested. (As an aside - has it been designed that way to try and prevent wayward buses falling onto the platform?) http://londonconnections.blogspot.co...d-of-year.html The southbound photo shows the access from the footbridge in the direction of the tracks via the narrowest part of the platform, rather than 'along' the line of the platform. Note also the (loudspeaker?) pole stood right on the corner, again narrowing the access - why isnt it hung off the footbridge structure? As far as I'm concerned the same sort of 'beginners mistake' as that DLR footbridge at Stratford, that should also access the platform away from the tracks... Paul S |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 1, 3:08*pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote: If I may, I'd like to recommend Mr Thants update to the Shepherds Bush platform saga. Good cross sectional drawing of the infamous wall behind the northbound platform, explains the difficulty of moving it, and showing the lights bracketed off the wall, as previously suggested. *(As an aside - has it been designed that way to try and prevent wayward buses falling onto the platform?) http://londonconnections.blogspot.co...-bush-overgrou... As far as I'm concerned the same sort of 'beginners mistake' as that DLR footbridge at Stratford, that should also access the platform away from the tracks... Paul S Hear, Hear. I expect that this could run and run whilst various lawyers employed by insurers providing professional indemnity endeavour.to attribute responsibility(AKA the blame). If it goes to arbitration it could take years. I am surprised that questions have not been raised in the House. Ken also seems to be curiously reticent. Accepting that some intractable bits may have been built - how difficult would it be to build a full width extension north of the existing platform and the using the existing narrow platform as a walkway. Is there room before the West Way Slip Road. Alas my Google Earth has not kept up with progress. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Scott" wrote in message ... If I may, I'd like to recommend Mr Thants update to the Shepherds Bush platform saga. Good cross sectional drawing of the infamous wall behind the northbound platform, explains the difficulty of moving it, and showing the lights bracketed off the wall, as previously suggested. (As an aside - has it been designed that way to try and prevent wayward buses falling onto the platform?) http://londonconnections.blogspot.co...d-of-year.html The southbound photo shows the access from the footbridge in the direction of the tracks via the narrowest part of the platform, rather than 'along' the line of the platform. Note also the (loudspeaker?) pole stood right on the corner, again narrowing the access - why isnt it hung off the footbridge structure? Either you have a different picture to the one in the link above, or bloody good resolution on your screen. I can bearly see the footbridge, let alone anything hanging off it tim |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "tim....." wrote in message ... "Paul Scott" wrote in message ... If I may, I'd like to recommend Mr Thants update to the Shepherds Bush platform saga. Good cross sectional drawing of the infamous wall behind the northbound platform, explains the difficulty of moving it, and showing the lights bracketed off the wall, as previously suggested. (As an aside - has it been designed that way to try and prevent wayward buses falling onto the platform?) http://londonconnections.blogspot.co...d-of-year.html The southbound photo shows the access from the footbridge in the direction of the tracks via the narrowest part of the platform, rather than 'along' the line of the platform. Note also the (loudspeaker?) pole stood right on the corner, again narrowing the access - why isnt it hung off the footbridge structure? Either you have a different picture to the one in the link above, or bloody good resolution on your screen. I can bearly see the footbridge, let alone anything hanging off it Have you clicked on the picture? :-) 'Footbridge' is possibly inaccurate, I'm referring to the grey box affair that is both the platform end of the footbridge stairs and waiting shelter. The footbridge itself is on the diagonal and 'behind the box' as it were... Paul |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1 Jan, 16:16, "tim....." wrote:
Either you have a different picture to the one in the link above, or bloody good resolution on your screen. *I can bearly see the footbridge, let alone anything hanging off it That's a fair point actually. I've replaced it with one taken from a different angle where you can see the footbridge. (though now you can only see the top of the lamp post Paul mentioned) U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mr Thant" wrote in message ... On 1 Jan, 16:16, "tim....." wrote: Either you have a different picture to the one in the link above, or bloody good resolution on your screen. I can bearly see the footbridge, let alone anything hanging off it That's a fair point actually. I've replaced it with one taken from a different angle where you can see the footbridge. (though now you can only see the top of the lamp post Paul mentioned) U ------------------------------------------------------------------------ You had me seriously worried there. I thought "I'm sure that this wasn't the picture I saw before". tim |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mr Thant wrote:
On 1 Jan, 16:16, "tim....." wrote: Either you have a different picture to the one in the link above, or bloody good resolution on your screen. I can bearly see the footbridge, let alone anything hanging off it That's a fair point actually. I've replaced it with one taken from a different angle where you can see the footbridge. I'm amused by the "Welcome to Shepherds Bush" message. The only people who will ever look at that sign will be trying to get out of Shepherds Bush ASAP. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In these days of being told to switch off lights and concern about the
planet, why does a station that has never seen or likely to see this century a single passenger, have the lights on 16 hours a day? I also like the " silverlink " station signs ( it was obvious to most that Ken's new train set would take over before the station opened! This must be the only stn to have new signs and they must surely become collector's item's due to the old franchise never stopping a service there. Who designed this balls up and who then approved it? I trust they got a very big bonus. "Paul Scott" wrote in message ... If I may, I'd like to recommend Mr Thants update to the Shepherds Bush platform saga. Good cross sectional drawing of the infamous wall behind the northbound platform, explains the difficulty of moving it, and showing the lights bracketed off the wall, as previously suggested. (As an aside - has it been designed that way to try and prevent wayward buses falling onto the platform?) http://londonconnections.blogspot.co...d-of-year.html The southbound photo shows the access from the footbridge in the direction of the tracks via the narrowest part of the platform, rather than 'along' the line of the platform. Note also the (loudspeaker?) pole stood right on the corner, again narrowing the access - why isnt it hung off the footbridge structure? As far as I'm concerned the same sort of 'beginners mistake' as that DLR footbridge at Stratford, that should also access the platform away from the tracks... Paul S |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: This must be the only stn to have new signs and they must surely become collector's item's due to the old franchise never stopping a service there. Sounds a bit like Canary Wharf DLR, where not only the sign, but the entire station was removed before it ever opened! |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 14:22:26 -0800 (PST), Stephen Furley wrote:
wrote: This must be the only stn to have new signs and they must surely become collector's item's due to the old franchise never stopping a service there. Sounds a bit like Canary Wharf DLR, where not only the sign, but the entire station was removed before it ever opened! Was it actually built, then? I went on an official visit which included a ride on most of the system, and the trains stopped in the middle of nowhere, as the station stop was programmed in to the computer. IIRC our guide explained that this was due to plans for the station having been put on hold, rather than it having been removed. It is 20 years ago though, so memory might be playing tricks. -- WZR |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Shepherds Bush station - West London line | London Transport | |||
Shepherds Bush Central line station improvements | London Transport | |||
Wood Lane & Shepherds Bush Market | London Transport | |||
Shepherds Bush | London Transport | |||
Escalator failures (was: Shepherds Bush) | London Transport |