Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Offramp" wrote in message ... On Feb 11, 7:17 pm, Boltar wrote: Had to go to a meeting at Hangar lane today. After white city the train just took off, we must've been doing 40-50 mph. How come the other tube lines are so slow in comparison? The piccadilly plods its way to acton town and the northern line between east finchley and finchley central seemed to barely get above 25mph the few times I did it last year. Why is the central line different? B2003 Yeah! I normally use the Northern or District, but I was on the Central the other day and it went like a rocket. However, I've heard that London Bridge-Southwark (Jubilee) is the fastest piece of track. In the case of both Northern and District, I suspect station spacing will have a lot to do with it. Travelling on the Northern line often feels so painfully slow because it's constantly stopping. Stations on the Vic are further apart, so trains spend less time stopping, and are able to get a slightly greater speed up during the long stretches. The Central line benefits from rising/falling gradients on the approaches to its stations in town, which means that trains will accelerate quickly when leaving a station. BTN |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
DLR going faster | London Transport | |||
Learn Chinese (Mandarin) faster by using flashcards with pictures | London Transport | |||
Why is Wembley Central Such a Dump | London Transport | |||
Why does this NG attract so much racist comment ? | London Transport | |||
Why the piccadilly to Heathrow , why not the District? | London Transport |