Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"MIG" wrote in message
On Feb 12, 10:50 am, "Recliner" wrote: "Boltar" wrote in message Had to go to a meeting at Hangar lane today. After white city the train just took off, we must've been doing 40-50 mph. How come the other tube lines are so slow in comparison? The piccadilly plods its way to acton town and the northern line between east finchley and finchley central seemed to barely get above 25mph the few times I did it last year. Why is the central line different? I'm guessing that the 1992 stock has the highest power to weight ratio of all LU trains. It's also the only stock to have every axle motored. Do any other British trains (including main line) have this? I think it may have been the case with the old District Line R stock. That always seemed to out-accelerate the 1962 stock at Mile End (but maybe only from 0 - 5 mph). Yes, I think the R Stock did have all axles powered, though I suspect that the power to weight ratio of a train from 60 years ago would have been less. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
DLR going faster | London Transport | |||
Learn Chinese (Mandarin) faster by using flashcards with pictures | London Transport | |||
Why is Wembley Central Such a Dump | London Transport | |||
Why does this NG attract so much racist comment ? | London Transport | |||
Why the piccadilly to Heathrow , why not the District? | London Transport |