Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#71
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:03:06 +0000, Graham Murray
wrote: On Newbury Buses the driver presses a button on the ticket machine for each passholder, season ticket holder etc, but it does not actually issue a ticket. I thought there was a requirement for a ticket to be issued under the new rules. A possible reason for this might be to avoid drivers sitting there prodding the pass button continuously in order to gain the company more subsidy than is due. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
#72
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:21:15 GMT, Neil Williams wrote:
On Newbury Buses the driver presses a button on the ticket machine for each passholder, season ticket holder etc, but it does not actually issue a ticket. I thought there was a requirement for a ticket to be issued under the new rules. A possible reason for this might be to avoid drivers sitting there prodding the pass button continuously in order to gain the company more subsidy than is due. On the assumption that they're too lazy to do so if it also means having to throw away some tickets? |
#73
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, Mizter T writes Ian Jelf wrote: It's splendid to hear there's some pedigree in such ventures. I'm afraid I'm more ignorant of matters pertaining to Lancashire than I care to admit, hence I've never heard that told before, but it sounds very interesting. Referred to in one of the Brian Turner / Steve Palmer Blackpool books, probably their Centenary (of the Borough, not the tramway) book of c1979. Can't get to it at the moment as it's with a vast collection of books at the Dowager Mrs. Jelf's place....... Any idea how many tram systems could theoretically be involved in such an excursion, and how far would the walks between them be? I have to say I think a little bit of this attitude would do us well in the modern day - people often seem very reluctant to make changes that involve even short walks between stations, or a bus stop and station. I meanwhile perhaps take a little to much satisfaction in doing such things! (OK I admit it, I'm a transport nerd!) A local bus ride, or rather a series of local bus rides is actually a brilliant way of sightseeing the "real" Britain that so many people say they're in search of but few ever leave their double-glazed air conditioned coaches to see. I recall also an article *many* years ago in Buses Magazine of two people doing a John O'Groats to Land's End trip in this way. Also, in a later "Buses Annual" Stewart J. Brown and Gavin Booth did a cross country trip from I think Liverpool to Hull in this way. Brown and Booth sound like they were great men... but I've never heard of them! Please enlighten me, were they noted bus writers of the era? They're both still very much around! Gavin Booth is a former editor of Buses Annual/Yearbook and has written countless (excellent) books on varied subjects. Stewart J. Brown is (I think) the present editor of Buses Yearbook and likewise has written vast amounts on the subject. Their articles are among the most readable I've ever read, so to speak. Nerd Free Zones, if you see what I mean. (Unfortunately if I heard someone was a "bus writer" nowadays I would first wish to ascertain whether or not that meant they were a tagger aka vandal.) I'd never thought of that! It's one of those things I've toyed with trying many times but alas it's harder these days as the bus network has some remarkable gaps sometimes. A Birmingham - Bristol trip in this way was a long-held ambition of mine but there appears now to be no realistic way of going by bus from Gloucester to Bristol, amazingly. You could allow yourself to 'cheat' once by getting an NX coach for this leg - only three a day mind, at 11.40, 14.05 and 20.05. It is sad to say that I know 'country folk' who know next to nothing about their local bus services - said services might be quite spectacularly deficient, but nonetheless they still exist - however if I suggest I/we come/go/have a day out using the bus I'm met with looks of astonishment! Of course in oh-so many places the bus network is a sad shadow of its former self. People give me that look even when I suggest going to see them in *urban* areas. I can think of none of my friends in the West Midlands at least who would think of taking the bus in the way I do. I do wonder if the "local bus" aspect of the new concessionary pass will sometimes lead to confusion as to what does and does not constitute a "local bus". Trent's TP service is one "grey area" I'd say. There also was once a National Express service which became a local bus for part of its length in the Pennines somewhere I seem to recall. Tour buses such as City Sightseeing also advertise "local fares available" (I understand to get some sort of deal with diesel duty). I wonder if that might make *them* liable to carry 60+ passengers free of charge? Test case coming I suspect! Aha - that explains something for me! I had indeed always been somewhat perplexed by sightseeing buses advertising the existence of "local fares", especially in London, but I had thought (to the limited extent I had though about it) that it was a genuine pitch for custom - not amongst Londoners you understand, but just amongst unadventurous/ tired/ lost tourists who might see a familiar sightseeing bus they had ridden sometime over the previous few days and sought refuge aboard it, in the knowledge that it would take them slowly but surely back to where their hotel was, or some such! I did think such a thing would be quite ridiculous, but still within the bounds of possibility - I'm glad to have had that cleared up! I'm not sure whether such sightseeing operators will be overly keen on letting mobs of older English people on board - that said I suppose they would be recompensed for it! I'm sure I read somewhere (can't remember where though) that the National Bus Pass scheme meant operators would be compensated for the full fare that would otherwise have been paid - but I do find that very hard to believe. Anyone know the broad outlines of how it will work? Well they certainly wouldn't be compensated to the tune oft he average ticket on a City Sightseeing bus! Doubtless, someone will soon be posting here with answers to these and many other questions. I've had a hard but satisfying day working in Abingdon, though, so having checked my e-mail I'm off for a bath and a beer! No buns today? Not an important enough day, Last done for the Golden Jubilee I think. Told everyone about the ceremony though. -- Ian Jelf, MITG Birmingham, UK Registered Blue Badge Tourist Guide for London and the Heart of England http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk |
#74
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message 01c871a1$00336260$LocalHost@default, Michael R N Dolbear
writes Ian Jelf wrote I do wonder if the "local bus" aspect of the new concessionary pass will sometimes lead to confusion as to what does and does not constitute a "local bus". Trent's TP service is one "grey area" I'd say. There also was once a National Express service which became a local bus for part of its length in the Pennines somewhere I seem to recall. Tour buses such as City Sightseeing also advertise "local fares available" (I understand to get some sort of deal with diesel duty). I wonder if that might make *them* liable to carry 60+ passengers free of charge? Test case coming I suspect! Free to pass holders, but I understand the District or Borough where they get on will have 60 fares to pay to the bus operator from their budget. That will be a distinct shock to the sightseeing operators, I suspect! Of course if the service is "operated on behalf of XXX Council" this may be a transfer from one public purse to another. Few of these sightseeing services are so operated. I noted that the 2007 summer-only "Royal Landscape Link" service. Ride Pegasus! (First in Berkshire) 300 (Virginia Water Station - Windsor via Windsor Great Park) has Concessionary Fare Permits are not valid on this service This service is supported by Royal Parks and Savill Garden Yes I noticed that last year. It made me wonder at the time if operators *can* choose to opt out of accepting concessionary passes on commercial services. Doubtless, someone will soon be posting here with answers to these and many other questions. The Freedom Pass site has : Q. What is the definition of a 'local' bus? A. The definition of a 'local bus' will be self-evident in most cases, but in a few instances could include some longer distance buses and coach services where part of their route is registered as a local bus service. If in doubt, freedom pass holders can check with the service operator or local Transport authority in that area. Of course, however much a "grey area" the nature of the registration of the service will give a definitive answer to this one. Should have thought of that. -- Ian Jelf, MITG Birmingham, UK Registered Blue Badge Tourist Guide for London and the Heart of England http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk |
#75
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Feb, 13:40, "Paul Scott" wrote:
Are they going back to the Rosco style setup after all then, or leasing directly from Bombardier? The latest press release clarifies: "QW Rail Leasing Ltd is a joint venture between two partners - National Australia Bank and SMBC Leasing and Finance, Inc.. The European Investment Bank has also provided financing "QW Rail Leasing Ltd bears the risk of disposing of the depreciated fleet after the lease is terminated. Transport for London bears the risk of the fleet performance and maintenance only during the term of the lease" http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/medi...ntre/7525.aspx It also emphasises they have the option of dropping the trains in 2027 and leasing new ones, and the size of the order has grown slightly from that previously announced. U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
#76
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:43:02 +0000, asdf
wrote: On the assumption that they're too lazy to do so if it also means having to throw away some tickets? Or that it might be obvious what they're doing (or that they're up to no good) and people might report it? Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
#77
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Ian Jelf wrote Free to pass holders, but I understand the District or Borough where they get on will have 60 fares to pay to the bus operator from their budget. That will be a distinct shock to the sightseeing operators, I suspect! http://www.surreycc.gov.uk/sccwebsit...pWebPagesByTIT LE_RTF/Notification+of+arrangement+for+concessionary+bus+ scheme+for+Apri l+2008?opendocument Reimbursement for local bus operators participating in the scheme will change from the current mileage based scheme to one based on the numbers of permit holders boarding within the county. Further information on claiming reimbursement is contained in a separate ‘Notes of Guidance to Operators’ which will be issued to operators participating in the scheme. Concessionary Fare Permits are not valid on this service This service is supported by Royal Parks and Savill Garden Yes I noticed that last year. It made me wonder at the time if operators *can* choose to opt out of accepting concessionary passes on commercial services. From the document above Permits cannot be used on: Services of limited duration, or to special events Long distance express services, such as operated by National Express Services other than bus services (such as tram, railway) Services in Wales, Scotland or N. Ireland Services which the Department for Transport may from time to time add to the above listing. So "summer only" might count as "limited duration" otherwise a ukase from the DfT will be needed. -- Mike D |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Overground stock | London Transport | |||
Overground stock | London Transport | |||
More sweaty armpits on the new Overground stock | London Transport | |||
TfL / NLL / Metronet surface stock / tube stock / Croxley link | London Transport | |||
1938 Stock on Uxbridge 100 and T Stock? | London Transport |