Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Anderson wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, J. Chisholm wrote: Where I used to live some idiot insisted on parking his (almost)HGV on the footway. Apart from the damage and difficulty in getting past with prams/pushchair etc, the water main beneath the path eventually failed. Now if only it were worth suing such idiots. Why isn't it? If the damage is worth less than 5000 UKP (which seems likely), the council could do it via the small claims process. That's simple and quick, and the court can't award costs, so even if the council loses, it doesn't cost them anything other than the wasted time. Being a large organisation who would be launching these cases quite often, they could run the operation very cheaply, and pretty solidly, so they should do well at it. tom Hopefully someone in a LA will read this and take up your sensible suggestion. I suspect the problem will be that they'll need to prove (on the balance of probability-this being a civil matter) that the damage was caused by the property owner and not some random builder working on an adjacent property who happened to park his 7 tonne truck on the pavement. Jim |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
LU planning three week block-closures | London Transport | |||
Tube Lines moving block signalling video | London Transport |