Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Mar, 12:52, MaxB wrote:
On 4 Mar, 18:53, Rupert Candy wrote: On Mar 3, 10:06*pm, MIG wrote: However, assuming that it counts as inner (should if some of those do) I am pleased to see that the much-maligned St Johns isn't in the list. Ah, the number of trains I've been on recently where the PIS proudly displays "Calling at all stations via Lewisham EXCEPT St Johns", as if its neglect is something to be proud of... :-P Ravensbourne can't be far off that list, either. St Johns would have been at No 34, Ravensbourne is counted as Outer London, but would have come in at 32! So well done St. Johns, everyone's favourite station! But if you want to talk about neglected stations, then you should be looking at Grove Park, along with Elmstead Woods, Chislehurst and the Bromley North branch. *Half hourly off peak service - pathetic! I don't think St Johns is really all that neglected. It's just that it's a branch line station that happens to be on the main line. Anyone who gets the same train every day which doesn't stop there says "nothing stops at St Johns", but they don't say "nothing stops at Crayford" if their regular train happens to go via Bexleyheath, because they don't see Crayford. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Mar, 12:52, MaxB wrote:
St Johns would have been at No 34, Ravensbourne is counted as Outer London, but would have come in at 32! So well done St. Johns, everyone's favourite station! But if you want to talk about neglected stations, then you should be looking at Grove Park, along with Elmstead Woods, Chislehurst and the Bromley North branch. *Half hourly off peak service - pathetic! Emerson Park, on the Romford-Upminster push-pull, gets about the same service. Jonn |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:40:38 +0000, MarkVarley - MVP wrote:
I'm looking for a very quiet station, one with very little people traffic either late at night or weekends, somewhere on the tube network or a rail station not too far out, this is for an informal photoshoot for which it's best to not have numerous people around. so any suggestions? somewhere on a little-used oddity of a branchline or even a disused station that can still be accessed, I need tracks and platform not too overgrown. PS, I'm aware of the permissions system for photoshoots in such places so no worries from that angle. I'd suggest the least-served stations in London, Sudbury & Harrow Road and/or Sudbury Hill Harrow. Both have no evening or weekend train service (and precious few trains during a weekday), and are completely unstaffed, so there should be no one around to bother you. AFAIK there's no physical way for the stations to be locked, so you should have no trouble gaining access. S&HR is high up on a viaduct with no buildings, so you should get good light. SHH is in a cutting and a little more secluded. You could also try South Greenford or Castle Bar Park, which have no evening or Sunday service, though off the top of my head I don't know whether they might be locked. By the way, if you use any of the suggestions from the group, posting links to some of the pics would be appreciated ![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:47:17 +0000, asdf
wrote this gibberish: I'd suggest the least-served stations in London, Sudbury & Harrow Road and/or Sudbury Hill Harrow. Both have no evening or weekend train service (and precious few trains during a weekday), and are completely unstaffed, so there should be no one around to bother you. AFAIK there's no physical way for the stations to be locked, so you should have no trouble gaining access. S&HR is high up on a viaduct with no buildings, so you should get good light. SHH is in a cutting and a little more secluded. both worth a look :-) thank you You could also try South Greenford or Castle Bar Park, which have no evening or Sunday service, though off the top of my head I don't know whether they might be locked. By the way, if you use any of the suggestions from the group, posting links to some of the pics would be appreciated ![]() will do :-) -- Mark. www.MarkVarleyPhoto.co.uk www.TwistedPhotography.co.uk www.TwistedArts.co.uk www.BeautifulBondage.net |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 Mar, 16:40, MarkVarley - MVP
wrote: I'm looking for a very quiet station, one with very little people traffic either late at night or weekends, somewhere on the tube network or a rail station not too far out, this is for an informal photoshoot for which it's best to not have numerous people around. so any suggestions? somewhere on a little-used oddity of a branchline or even a disused station that can still be accessed, I need tracks and platform not too overgrown. PS, I'm aware of the permissions system for photoshoots in such places so no worries from that angle. -- Mark.http://www.MarkVarleyPhoto.co.ukwww....fulBondage.net One station I know which has very little use, day or night is Bayford. Hopefully not to far out for you either. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 05:11:12 -0800 (PST), somersetchris
wrote this gibberish: On 3 Mar, 16:40, MarkVarley - MVP wrote: I'm looking for a very quiet station, one with very little people traffic either late at night or weekends, somewhere on the tube network or a rail station not too far out, this is for an informal photoshoot for which it's best to not have numerous people around. so any suggestions? somewhere on a little-used oddity of a branchline or even a disused station that can still be accessed, I need tracks and platform not too overgrown. PS, I'm aware of the permissions system for photoshoots in such places so no worries from that angle. -- Mark.http://www.MarkVarleyPhoto.co.ukwww....fulBondage.net One station I know which has very little use, day or night is Bayford. Hopefully not to far out for you either. thats a distinct possibility actually as it's only 35 minutes from high&is do you happen to know if all the lights work on the platforms? -- Mark. www.MarkVarleyPhoto.co.uk www.TwistedPhotography.co.uk www.TwistedArts.co.uk www.BeautifulBondage.net |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stratford has 2 or 3 platforms which are, AFAIAA, still open but have
lost all their regular timetabled trains. I'd expect they'll be pretty quiet. Semi-derelict buildings etc. Can't remember the numbers but they're the furthest ones across from the main entrance (ie opposite side of the GE mainline from the Central line/DLR platforms). |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Mar, 15:32, Keith Raeburn wrote:
Stratford has 2 or 3 platforms which are, AFAIAA, still open but have lost all their regular timetabled trains. I'd expect they'll be pretty quiet. Semi-derelict buildings etc. Can't remember the numbers but they're the furthest ones across from the main entrance (ie opposite side of the GE mainline from the Central line/DLR platforms). They're not quiet any more - there are new platforms for the North London Line being constructed alongside them. In addition some of the really derelict buildings have just been knocked down. Plus there is an hourly service that uses one of the platforms. Possibly worth a look nonetheless. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 08:13:12 -0800 (PST), Mizter T
wrote this gibberish: On 4 Mar, 15:32, Keith Raeburn wrote: Stratford has 2 or 3 platforms which are, AFAIAA, still open but have lost all their regular timetabled trains. I'd expect they'll be pretty quiet. Semi-derelict buildings etc. Can't remember the numbers but they're the furthest ones across from the main entrance (ie opposite side of the GE mainline from the Central line/DLR platforms). They're not quiet any more - there are new platforms for the North London Line being constructed alongside them. In addition some of the really derelict buildings have just been knocked down. Plus there is an hourly service that uses one of the platforms. Possibly worth a look nonetheless. still worth a look as it's not far from me (Hackney). -- Mark. www.MarkVarleyPhoto.co.uk www.TwistedPhotography.co.uk www.TwistedArts.co.uk www.BeautifulBondage.net |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Mar, 15:27, MarkVarley - MVP
wrote: On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 05:11:12 -0800 (PST), somersetchris wrote this gibberish: On 3 Mar, 16:40, MarkVarley - MVP wrote: I'm looking for a very quiet station, one with very little people traffic either late at night or weekends, somewhere on the tube network or a rail station not too far out, this is for an informal photoshoot for which it's best to not have numerous people around. so any suggestions? somewhere on a little-used oddity of a branchline or even a disused station that can still be accessed, I need tracks and platform not too overgrown. PS, I'm aware of the permissions system for photoshoots in such places so no worries from that angle. -- Mark.http://www.MarkVarleyPhoto.co.ukwww....ww.TwistedArts.... One station I know which has very little use, day or night is Bayford. Hopefully not to far out for you either. thats a distinct possibility actually as it's only 35 minutes from high&is do you happen to know if all the lights work on the platforms? -- Mark.http://www.MarkVarleyPhoto.co.ukwww....fulBondage.net I am afraid that I have not been through there for a few weeks, but they were working. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
quiet time for London transport? | London Transport | |||
The quiet skies over London town | London Transport | |||
London Black Cabbies learning to keep quiet, but... | London Transport | |||
Quiet | London Transport | |||
New Abbreviation for two LU stations. | London Transport |