Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Mar, 18:53, Rupert Candy wrote:
On Mar 3, 10:06*pm, MIG wrote: However, assuming that it counts as inner (should if some of those do) I am pleased to see that the much-maligned St Johns isn't in the list. Ah, the number of trains I've been on recently where the PIS proudly displays "Calling at all stations via Lewisham EXCEPT St Johns", as if its neglect is something to be proud of... :-P Ravensbourne can't be far off that list, either. St Johns would have been at No 34, Ravensbourne is counted as Outer London, but would have come in at 32! So well done St. Johns, everyone's favourite station! But if you want to talk about neglected stations, then you should be looking at Grove Park, along with Elmstead Woods, Chislehurst and the Bromley North branch. Half hourly off peak service - pathetic! MaxB |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Mar, 12:52, MaxB wrote:
On 4 Mar, 18:53, Rupert Candy wrote: On Mar 3, 10:06*pm, MIG wrote: However, assuming that it counts as inner (should if some of those do) I am pleased to see that the much-maligned St Johns isn't in the list. Ah, the number of trains I've been on recently where the PIS proudly displays "Calling at all stations via Lewisham EXCEPT St Johns", as if its neglect is something to be proud of... :-P Ravensbourne can't be far off that list, either. St Johns would have been at No 34, Ravensbourne is counted as Outer London, but would have come in at 32! So well done St. Johns, everyone's favourite station! But if you want to talk about neglected stations, then you should be looking at Grove Park, along with Elmstead Woods, Chislehurst and the Bromley North branch. *Half hourly off peak service - pathetic! I don't think St Johns is really all that neglected. It's just that it's a branch line station that happens to be on the main line. Anyone who gets the same train every day which doesn't stop there says "nothing stops at St Johns", but they don't say "nothing stops at Crayford" if their regular train happens to go via Bexleyheath, because they don't see Crayford. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Mar, 12:52, MaxB wrote:
St Johns would have been at No 34, Ravensbourne is counted as Outer London, but would have come in at 32! So well done St. Johns, everyone's favourite station! But if you want to talk about neglected stations, then you should be looking at Grove Park, along with Elmstead Woods, Chislehurst and the Bromley North branch. *Half hourly off peak service - pathetic! Emerson Park, on the Romford-Upminster push-pull, gets about the same service. Jonn |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 5 Mar, 14:30, wrote: On 5 Mar, 12:52, MaxB wrote: St Johns would have been at No 34, Ravensbourne is counted as Outer London, but would have come in at 32! So well done St. Johns, everyone's favourite station! But if you want to talk about neglected stations, then you should be looking at Grove Park, along with Elmstead Woods, Chislehurst and the Bromley North branch. Half hourly off peak service - pathetic! Emerson Park, on the Romford-Upminster push-pull, gets about the same service. There are several routes and stations in London with a half-hourly service - e.g. the South London Line service (Victoria - London Bridge via Peckham Rye), stations between Ravensbourne and Crofton Park, Nunhead to Lewisham, stations on the Wimbledon - Sutton loop etc etc. St Johns actually gets a pretty good service, at least 4tph. |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Mar, 14:49, Mizter T wrote:
On 5 Mar, 14:30, wrote: On 5 Mar, 12:52, MaxB wrote: St Johns would have been at No 34, Ravensbourne is counted as Outer London, but would have come in at 32! So well done St. Johns, everyone's favourite station! But if you want to talk about neglected stations, then you should be looking at Grove Park, along with Elmstead Woods, Chislehurst and the Bromley North branch. *Half hourly off peak service - pathetic! Emerson Park, on the Romford-Upminster push-pull, gets about the same service. There are several routes and stations in London with a half-hourly service - e.g. the South London Line service (Victoria - London Bridge via Peckham Rye), stations between Ravensbourne and Crofton Park, Nunhead to Lewisham, stations on the Wimbledon - Sutton loop etc etc. St Johns actually gets a pretty good service, at least 4tph. Indeed, better than Elmstead Woods, Chislehurst etc, but no one says "nothing stops at ..." in relation to those, despite them being on the main line. I haven't been there for a while, but I had the impression that the St Johns ticket office was tending to be better staffed these days as well. |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Mar, 14:49, Mizter T wrote:
On 5 Mar, 14:30, wrote: On 5 Mar, 12:52, MaxB wrote: St Johns would have been at No 34, Ravensbourne is counted as Outer London, but would have come in at 32! So well done St. Johns, everyone's favourite station! But if you want to talk about neglected stations, then you should be looking at Grove Park, along with Elmstead Woods, Chislehurst and the Bromley North branch. *Half hourly off peak service - pathetic! Emerson Park, on the Romford-Upminster push-pull, gets about the same service. There are several routes and stations in London with a half-hourly service - e.g. the South London Line service (Victoria - London Bridge via Peckham Rye), stations between Ravensbourne and Crofton Park, Nunhead to Lewisham, stations on the Wimbledon - Sutton loop etc etc. St Johns actually gets a pretty good service, at least 4tph. St Johns (my local station!) also often has people hanging about for the next train, because that frequency is rather irregular (two within 5 mins, then a half hour gap). It's also overlooked by houses, and plenty of trains do go past! |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Mar, 18:03, SamB wrote:
On 5 Mar, 14:49, Mizter T wrote: On 5 Mar, 14:30, wrote: On 5 Mar, 12:52, MaxB wrote: St Johns would have been at No 34, Ravensbourne is counted as Outer London, but would have come in at 32! So well done St. Johns, everyone's favourite station! But if you want to talk about neglected stations, then you should be looking at Grove Park, along with Elmstead Woods, Chislehurst and the Bromley North branch. *Half hourly off peak service - pathetic! Emerson Park, on the Romford-Upminster push-pull, gets about the same service. There are several routes and stations in London with a half-hourly service - e.g. the South London Line service (Victoria - London Bridge via Peckham Rye), stations between Ravensbourne and Crofton Park, Nunhead to Lewisham, stations on the Wimbledon - Sutton loop etc etc. St Johns actually gets a pretty good service, at least 4tph. St Johns (my local station!) also often has people hanging about for the next train, because that frequency is rather irregular (two within 5 mins, then a half hour gap). It's also overlooked by houses, and plenty of trains do go past!- The service from St Johns to Cannon Street is basically the same as that from Lewisham to Charing Cross, ie they both have bunched trains every half hour and twenty-odd minute gaps. Lewisham has other services of course. I wish someone would fix the timetabling so that the area didn't have such big gaps between services which appear to have a good number of tph. |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Mar, 14:30, wrote:
On 5 Mar, 12:52, MaxB wrote: St Johns would have been at No 34, Ravensbourne is counted as Outer London, but would have come in at 32! So well done St. Johns, everyone's favourite station! But if you want to talk about neglected stations, then you should be looking at Grove Park, along with Elmstead Woods, Chislehurst and the Bromley North branch. *Half hourly off peak service - pathetic! Emerson Park, on the Romford-Upminster push-pull, gets about the same service. Jonn And reasonably so, since it barely registers on the passenger count scale, fitting in on the list I gave earlier at No 4 ! Also, I assume, it has no other trains passing through. MaxB |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 Mar, 16:40, MarkVarley - MVP
wrote: I'm looking for a very quiet station, one with very little people traffic either late at night or weekends, somewhere on the tube network or a rail station not too far out, this is for an informal photoshoot for which it's best to not have numerous people around. so any suggestions? somewhere on a little-used oddity of a branchline or even a disused station that can still be accessed, I need tracks and platform not too overgrown. PS, I'm aware of the permissions system for photoshoots in such places so no worries from that angle. -- Mark.http://www.MarkVarleyPhoto.co.ukwww....fulBondage.net By the way, this is where you can get the usage info I have been quoting. http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/server/show/nav.1529 Doesn't say how weedy the place is however ![]() MaxB |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:45:58 -0800 (PST), MaxB
wrote this gibberish: On 3 Mar, 16:40, MarkVarley - MVP wrote: I'm looking for a very quiet station, one with very little people traffic either late at night or weekends, somewhere on the tube network or a rail station not too far out, this is for an informal photoshoot for which it's best to not have numerous people around. so any suggestions? somewhere on a little-used oddity of a branchline or even a disused station that can still be accessed, I need tracks and platform not too overgrown. PS, I'm aware of the permissions system for photoshoots in such places so no worries from that angle. -- Mark.http://www.MarkVarleyPhoto.co.ukwww....fulBondage.net By the way, this is where you can get the usage info I have been quoting. http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/server/show/nav.1529 Doesn't say how weedy the place is however ![]() MaxB I'll take a look :-) -- Mark. www.MarkVarleyPhoto.co.uk www.TwistedPhotography.co.uk www.TwistedArts.co.uk www.BeautifulBondage.net |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
quiet time for London transport? | London Transport | |||
The quiet skies over London town | London Transport | |||
London Black Cabbies learning to keep quiet, but... | London Transport | |||
Quiet | London Transport | |||
New Abbreviation for two LU stations. | London Transport |