| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
March 26th 08, 05:54 PM
posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit
|
|||
|
|||
Crossrail could bankrupt London - says Ken Livingstone
On Mar 26, 9:17*am, Mizter T wrote:
On 26 Mar, 05:59, The Real Doctor wrote: On 25 Mar, 22:15, Tony Polson wrote: Dan G wrote: On Mar 25, 1:37 pm, Tony Polson wrote: Dan G wrote: I think the real rub of Crossrail is that for £16bn you could have pretty much every other project one would want on the rest of the English network -- Weald re-openings, East-West routes, lots of electrification, old alignments and useful chords reopened, lots of railfrieght interchanges etc. All that would benefit more people in more places than Crossrail ever will. Complete tosh. Please explain. No point lecturing to the deaf. And that, Dan, is all you'll get, I'm afraid. Irritating, isn't it. I'm guessing that Mr Polson doesn't think £16bn would cover the cost of all these other projects, but as he hasn't deemed it necessary to clarify himself when asked politely Behavior many of us are used to seeing. We have learned to ignore it. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Ken Livingstone Polluting the Planet | London Transport | |||
| KEN LIVINGSTONE: RACIST | London Transport | |||
| London population not increasing as much as Ken Livinstone says | London Transport | |||
| A big Thank You to Ken Livingstone | London Transport | |||
| Ken says yes to Crystal Palace tram extension | London Transport | |||
Hybrid Mode
