Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmmm. I've read somewhere that speed bumps create more pollution
because of the slow-down/speed-up/slow-down/speed-up driving pattern that results, but never that they cause any deaths. Before someone else gets in there. The reason some councils are removing speed bumps is because emergency service vehicles (especially) ambulances are being delayed trying to get over the speed bumps. And I think infact patients have been injured even more going over speed bumps. And deaths have been proved to a result of speed bumps. But not in a way you were probably thinking of. Actually, one thing that sleeping policemen cause me to do is drive in the middle of the road instead of the left hand side. This is on the roads where there are 3 of them, and the one on the left-hand side is obscured by parked vehicles, so I have to drive over the middle one. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Colin Rosenstiel) wrote the following in:
In article , (Robin May) wrote: (nmtop40) wrote the following in: om Actually, one thing that sleeping policemen cause me to do is drive in the middle of the road instead of the left hand side. This is on the roads where there are 3 of them, and the one on the left-hand side is obscured by parked vehicles, so I have to drive over the middle one. There's a road near me where the speed bumps (which are of the two separate hump variety) are practically unnoticeable if you drive over the middle of them between the two humps. As a result, everyone drives over the middle of them (and therefore in the middle of the road) at 30mph. Until a car is coming the other way, when they slow down, as intended. Actually when a car is coming the other way the usual result is that one car stays in the middle of the road while the other goes into their side of the road to avoid the oncoming car. There is also the problem that two sets of speed bumps are on corners with limited visibility. This means that you'll often meet a car flying round the bend in the middle of the road. Sound dangerous to you? It certainly looks it to me. -- message by Robin May, founder of International Boyism "Would Inspector Sands please go to the Operations Room immediately." Unofficially immune to hangovers. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Robin May wrote in message ... (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote the following in: In article , (Robin May) wrote: (nmtop40) wrote the following in: om Actually, one thing that sleeping policemen cause me to do is drive in the middle of the road instead of the left hand side. This is on the roads where there are 3 of them, and the one on the left-hand side is obscured by parked vehicles, so I have to drive over the middle one. There's a road near me where the speed bumps (which are of the two separate hump variety) are practically unnoticeable if you drive over the middle of them between the two humps. As a result, everyone drives over the middle of them (and therefore in the middle of the road) at 30mph. Until a car is coming the other way, when they slow down, as intended. Actually when a car is coming the other way the usual result is that one car stays in the middle of the road while the other goes into their side of the road to avoid the oncoming car. There is also the problem that two sets of speed bumps are on corners with limited visibility. This means that you'll often meet a car flying round the bend in the middle of the road. Sound dangerous to you? It certainly looks it to me. -- If you decide to drive down the middle to avoid the speed bump peaks you are more than likely to collide with an innocent car that is pulling out of a side road and intends to travel in the opposite direction to you. How would you explain to your insurance company that you were driving down the middle of the road to avoid the bumps so you could maintain the maximum speed. daveF |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"df" wrote the following in:
If you decide to drive down the middle to avoid the speed bump peaks you are more than likely to collide with an innocent car that is pulling out of a side road and intends to travel in the opposite direction to you. Me=innocent car at risk of collision. How would you explain to your insurance company that you were driving down the middle of the road to avoid the bumps so you could maintain the maximum speed. I don't know, it would be hard to explain something I wasn't doing. -- message by Robin May, founder of International Boyism "Would Inspector Sands please go to the Operations Room immediately." Unofficially immune to hangovers. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There's a road near me where the speed bumps (which are of the two
separate hump variety) are practically unnoticeable if you drive over the middle of them between the two humps. As a result, everyone drives over the middle of them (and therefore in the middle of the road) at 30mph. Longford Street / Drummond Street NW1 is like that. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
motorways | London Transport | |||
thankfully no motorways in Islington! | London Transport | |||
Highbury and Islington Heat | London Transport | |||
Highbury and Islington Heat | London Transport | |||
Highbury and Islington Heat | London Transport |