Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 8, 12:01 pm, alex_t wrote:
No excuse at all , because obviously I always carry a laptop around with me wherever I go. Why didn't I think of logging on when I was standing in that bus queue? Must've just slipped my mind. No excuse, because judging from your posting frequency you obviously have an Internet connection around the clock - and may be it's about time to start using it for something useful, don't you think? I don't generally have one when I'm out and about you muppet. P.S. Oyster website works from mobile phone too - no need for laptop. Not on my cheap pay as you go they don't and even if it did, you think I'm spending money to check my oyster card balance? Get real. B2003 |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 8, 2:13 pm, "Richard J." wrote:
If checking your balance is so difficult for you to organise, why not use auto-top-up? A) I don't use it enough to make it worthwhile. B) If you think I'm giving TfL my credit card details you're leaving in a dream world C) None of this provides a good reason for paying by cash being twice the price. D) Are the TfL apologists breeding or have they started implanting the mind control chips in others now? B2003 |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 8, 12:20 pm, MIG wrote:
There seems to be a standard pattern to these exchanges. Person A points out that certain people (eg those living in South London or occasional visitors) are disadvantaged by rules which need not be as they are and suggests a simple change to the rules. Person B pointlessly (I mean helpfully) explains how you can do some laborious things to avoid the situation. Person A says yes I know all that, but there are situations where a person can still legitimately be in a position where they are disadvantaged (eg machine not working, shop in wrong direction, bank holiday etc etc), and that rather than them have to get round it, they are still suggesting that the rule could be changed. Person C chimes in with something really ludicrous like suggesting that you are an idiot for not logging into the Web from a bus queue or planning every journey days in advance. Person A says for Godsake, I am just pointing out that the unfairness is unnecessary and could be solved (repeating whatever the suggestion was, eg normal priced extensions for paper travelcards). Person B comes back and says "you are making a mountain out of a molehill". The thing about all this is not the scale of the molehill, just that when there is a molehill, however small, for which there is a solution, it is sheer bloody-mindedness that makes TfL and its defenders refuse to contemplate addressing it. Quite! B2003 |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8 May, 12:20, MIG wrote:
There seems to be a standard pattern to these exchanges. Person A points out that certain people (eg those living in South London or occasional visitors) are disadvantaged by rules which need not be as they are and suggests a simple change to the rules. [...] Person A says for Godsake, I am just pointing out that the unfairness is unnecessary and could be solved (repeating whatever the suggestion was, eg normal priced extensions for paper travelcards). Person B comes back and says "you are making a mountain out of a molehill". The thing about all this is not the scale of the molehill, just that when there is a molehill, however small, for which there is a solution, it is sheer bloody-mindedness that makes TfL and its defenders refuse to contemplate addressing it. In this case, Person A wasn't talking about something sensible and straightforward like extension fares - they were suggesting that the price differential between Oyster and paper tickets should be abolished, despite the fact that paper tickets are substantially more expensive for TfL to deal with. Yes, auto-top-up should work on buses, prepay should be valid for all rail travel within Greater London, etc, and no, the fact that these don't work isn't the regular punter's fault. But that doesn't alter the original point, which is that it saves us all a lot of time and money if people use Oyster; therefore people who don't use Oyster cost us all a lot of time and money; therefore it's fair to charge them more for the privilege. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#55
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#56
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 8 May 2008 02:33:24 -0700 (PDT), Boltar
wrote: On May 8, 7:30 am, James Farrar wrote: On Tue, 6 May 2008 03:49:51 -0700 (PDT), Boltar wrote: On May 6, 11:12 am, John B wrote: [as well as the auto-top-up point someone else mentioned, aren't there any newsagents near your house?] If i'd known it had run out I'd have topped it up beforehand. Its a bit late when I'm already on the bus. In other words, you didn't keep track of the balance on your card, an entirely trivial thing to do. Of course , when I'm in a hurry back from somewhere I'll always glance at the gate to see the balance left with a dozen people in a hurry behind me to get out - oh wait , not all of them show it. But thats easily solved - next time I want to get a bus I'll just head off down the tube station to see how much I have on my card - oh wait , its a mile away and the nearby NR station doesn't take prepay and has no machines to read it. Well thats ok , I'll just go to the nearby newsagents and ask them. Oh , its bank holiday and they're closed. Yes , trivial, and I should be punished by having to pay double fare. Do you work for the Labour party by any chance? This last question is quite possibly the funniest thing I've ever read on Usenet. Every time you use your Oyster card, you should be looking at the display, if only to check that the card has been read correctly. When you look at the display, it tells you your balance (if you have used PAYG for that journey). Therefore, it is trivial to know when you're running low on credit. You mentioned not using PAYG often enough to make atuo-topup worthwhile. In that case, may I suggest that you give yourself a target to keep your balance within a band of, say, £5-£15. That way, when your balance drops below £5, you have plenty of time to add £10 before you run out of credit. Your moan about not all gates showing the balance is technically true but irrelevant - the only gates, TTBOMK, that don't have a display are the *in* gates on the oldest model gates. Even if you happen to use one such gate to enter the Tube system, you will still be leaving it by a gate with a reader or a standalone target - all of which will show you your balance. Bottom line, when you get penalised because you screwed up - that's no-one's fault but your own. -- James Farrar . @gmail.com |
#57
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8 May, 17:30, James Farrar wrote:
On Thu, 8 May 2008 02:33:24 -0700 (PDT), Boltar wrote: On May 8, 7:30 am, James Farrar wrote: On Tue, 6 May 2008 03:49:51 -0700 (PDT), Boltar wrote: On May 6, 11:12 am, John B wrote: [as well as the auto-top-up point someone else mentioned, aren't there any newsagents near your house?] If i'd known it had run out I'd have topped it up beforehand. Its a bit late when I'm already on the bus. In other words, you didn't keep track of the balance on your card, an entirely trivial thing to do. Of course , when I'm in a hurry back from somewhere I'll always glance at the gate to see the balance left with a dozen people in a hurry behind me to get out - oh wait , not all of them show it. But thats easily solved - next time I want to get a bus I'll just head off down the tube station to see how much I have on my card - oh wait , its a mile away and the nearby NR station doesn't take prepay and has no machines to read it. Well thats ok , I'll just go to the nearby newsagents and ask them. Oh , its bank holiday and they're closed. Yes , trivial, and I should be punished by having to pay double fare. Do you work for the Labour party by any chance? This last question is quite possibly the funniest thing I've ever read on Usenet. Every time you use your Oyster card, you should be looking at the display, if only to check that the card has been read correctly. When you look at the display, it tells you your balance (if you have used PAYG for that journey). Therefore, it is trivial to know when you're running low on credit. You mentioned not using PAYG often enough to make atuo-topup worthwhile. In that case, may I suggest that you give yourself a target to keep your balance within a band of, say, £5-£15. That way, when your balance drops below £5, you have plenty of time to add £10 before you run out of credit. Your moan about not all gates showing the balance is technically true but irrelevant - the only gates, TTBOMK, that don't have a display are the *in* gates on the oldest model gates. Even if you happen to use one such gate to enter the Tube system, you will still be leaving it by a gate with a reader or a standalone target - all of which will show you your balance. I can't remember the last time I went in or out of an LU gate that displayed anything at all apart from maybe "Enter" or "Exit". |
#58
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 8 May 2008 09:35:03 -0700 (PDT), MIG
wrote: On 8 May, 17:30, James Farrar wrote: Your moan about not all gates showing the balance is technically true but irrelevant - the only gates, TTBOMK, that don't have a display are the *in* gates on the oldest model gates. Even if you happen to use one such gate to enter the Tube system, you will still be leaving it by a gate with a reader or a standalone target - all of which will show you your balance. I can't remember the last time I went in or out of an LU gate that displayed anything at all apart from maybe "Enter" or "Exit". Using PAYG or a Travelcard? -- James Farrar . @gmail.com |
#59
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() A) I don't use it enough to make it worthwhile. It would occasionally save you the difference between cash and Oyster fares - makes sense if it is a frequent problem for you. B) If you think I'm giving TfL my credit card details you're leaving in a dream world Any reasonable explanation why not? C) None of this provides a good reason for paying by cash being twice the price. Yes, but the cost of paper tickets, handling, printing, proofing them from fakes - all the extra costs that TfL needs to cover somehow. And the less people use paper tickets, the more expensive it gets for single ticket (economy of scale) and the bigger loss for TfL. |
#60
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I don't generally have one when I'm out and about. Well, I don't know, you could check before going out - I mean, tens of thousands of people somehow manage that. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TfL To Remove Roadside Ticket Machines For Buses | London Transport | |||
"Oyster Card barrier blunders cost passengers £60m a year" | London Transport | |||
Oyster Helpline Cost | London Transport | |||
Legal threats remove news reports from Unofficial Tramlink site | London Transport | |||
Cash Machines Heathrow #3 | London Transport |