On Tue, 6 May 2008 03:50:47 -0700 (PDT), Boltar
wrote:

On May 6, 11:15 am, Scott wrote:
I thought you could by registering your bank account details on the
tfl site.

You'd have to be an idiot to give your bank details to TfL.

B2003

That is a different question. What the poster said was:

I think Boris should introduce a scheme whereby you
can top up your Oyster automatically when it runs out...

I said I think you can. Are you disputing this?

On May 6, 1:33 pm, Scott wrote:
On Tue, 6 May 2008 03:50:47 -0700 (PDT), Boltar

wrote:
On May 6, 11:15 am, Scott wrote:
I thought you could by registering your bank account details on the
tfl site.

You'd have to be an idiot to give your bank details to TfL.

B2003

That is a different question. What the poster said was:

I think Boris should introduce a scheme whereby you
can top up your Oyster automatically when it runs out...

I said I think you can. Are you disputing this?

Did it look like I was disputing it? Do try and keep up.

B2003

On Tue, 6 May 2008 06:33:31 -0700 (PDT), Boltar
wrote:

On May 6, 1:33 pm, Scott wrote:
On Tue, 6 May 2008 03:50:47 -0700 (PDT), Boltar

wrote:
On May 6, 11:15 am, Scott wrote:
I thought you could by registering your bank account details on the
tfl site.

You'd have to be an idiot to give your bank details to TfL.

B2003

That is a different question. What the poster said was:

I think Boris should introduce a scheme whereby you
can top up your Oyster automatically when it runs out...

I said I think you can. Are you disputing this?

Did it look like I was disputing it? Do try and keep up.

It looked like you were posting randomly without regard to the
previous posting but I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.

Scott wrote:


It looked like you were posting randomly without regard to the
previous posting but I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.

Just to be clear, it's a nailed on certainty that any thread featuring
'Boltar' will degenerate into a blizzard of very short postings from
said gentleman mostly being unpleasantly rude and refusing to engage in
any actual discussion. I therefore decided to go straight to sarcasm
and leave it there. Saves time, and it's not like anyone can persuade
him otherwise anyway.

Tom

On Tue, 06 May 2008 19:25:56 +0100, Tom Barry
wrote:

Scott wrote:


It looked like you were posting randomly without regard to the
previous posting but I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.

Just to be clear, it's a nailed on certainty that any thread featuring
'Boltar' will degenerate into a blizzard of very short postings from
said gentleman mostly being unpleasantly rude and refusing to engage in
any actual discussion. I therefore decided to go straight to sarcasm
and leave it there. Saves time, and it's not like anyone can persuade
him otherwise anyway.

Tom

Okay, I have looked back. I see what has happened. Not being a
Londoner I did not fully appreciate this earlier on.

On 6 May, 19:25, Tom Barry wrote:
Scott wrote:
It looked like you were posting randomly without regard to the
previous posting but I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.

Just to be clear, it's a nailed on certainty that any thread featuring
'Boltar' will degenerate into a blizzard of very short postings from
said gentleman mostly being unpleasantly rude and refusing to engage in
any actual discussion. I therefore decided to go straight to sarcasm
and leave it there. Saves time, and it's not like anyone can persuade
him otherwise anyway.

Ha , thats ironic given the number of LU & TfL sheeple on here who no
matter what these organisations do or suggest its always a good idea.
TfL could suggest invading Poland and someone on here would nod in
approval.

Until someone can give me a good reason why paying by cash should be
penalised by TfL then I don't see why I should change my opinion. I'm
not interested in how it may or may not benefit TfL , as a passenger
thats of no concern to me anymore than I give a rats arse how Asda or
Tesco or Mr Patel in his corner shop deal with cash. I want to know
how it benefits me and frankly I can't think of any good reason for
them to penalise its use from a passengers point of view.

B2003

On Tue, 6 May 2008, Boltar wrote:

On 6 May, 19:25, Tom Barry wrote:
Scott wrote:
It looked like you were posting randomly without regard to the
previous posting but I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.

Just to be clear, it's a nailed on certainty that any thread featuring
'Boltar' will degenerate into a blizzard of very short postings from
said gentleman mostly being unpleasantly rude and refusing to engage in
any actual discussion. I therefore decided to go straight to sarcasm
and leave it there. Saves time, and it's not like anyone can persuade
him otherwise anyway.

Ha , thats ironic given the number of LU & TfL sheeple on here who no
matter what these organisations do or suggest its always a good idea.
TfL could suggest invading Poland and someone on here would nod in
approval.

GODWIN!

tom

--
First man to add a mixer get a shoeing! -- The Laird