Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott wrote:
It looked like you were posting randomly without regard to the previous posting but I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. Just to be clear, it's a nailed on certainty that any thread featuring 'Boltar' will degenerate into a blizzard of very short postings from said gentleman mostly being unpleasantly rude and refusing to engage in any actual discussion. I therefore decided to go straight to sarcasm and leave it there. Saves time, and it's not like anyone can persuade him otherwise anyway. Tom |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 06 May 2008 19:25:56 +0100, Tom Barry
wrote: Scott wrote: It looked like you were posting randomly without regard to the previous posting but I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. Just to be clear, it's a nailed on certainty that any thread featuring 'Boltar' will degenerate into a blizzard of very short postings from said gentleman mostly being unpleasantly rude and refusing to engage in any actual discussion. I therefore decided to go straight to sarcasm and leave it there. Saves time, and it's not like anyone can persuade him otherwise anyway. Tom Okay, I have looked back. I see what has happened. Not being a Londoner I did not fully appreciate this earlier on. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 May, 19:25, Tom Barry wrote:
Scott wrote: It looked like you were posting randomly without regard to the previous posting but I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. Just to be clear, it's a nailed on certainty that any thread featuring 'Boltar' will degenerate into a blizzard of very short postings from said gentleman mostly being unpleasantly rude and refusing to engage in any actual discussion. I therefore decided to go straight to sarcasm and leave it there. Saves time, and it's not like anyone can persuade him otherwise anyway. Ha , thats ironic given the number of LU & TfL sheeple on here who no matter what these organisations do or suggest its always a good idea. TfL could suggest invading Poland and someone on here would nod in approval. Until someone can give me a good reason why paying by cash should be penalised by TfL then I don't see why I should change my opinion. I'm not interested in how it may or may not benefit TfL , as a passenger thats of no concern to me anymore than I give a rats arse how Asda or Tesco or Mr Patel in his corner shop deal with cash. I want to know how it benefits me and frankly I can't think of any good reason for them to penalise its use from a passengers point of view. B2003 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 6 May 2008, Boltar wrote:
On 6 May, 19:25, Tom Barry wrote: Scott wrote: It looked like you were posting randomly without regard to the previous posting but I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. Just to be clear, it's a nailed on certainty that any thread featuring 'Boltar' will degenerate into a blizzard of very short postings from said gentleman mostly being unpleasantly rude and refusing to engage in any actual discussion. I therefore decided to go straight to sarcasm and leave it there. Saves time, and it's not like anyone can persuade him otherwise anyway. Ha , thats ironic given the number of LU & TfL sheeple on here who no matter what these organisations do or suggest its always a good idea. TfL could suggest invading Poland and someone on here would nod in approval. GODWIN! tom -- First man to add a mixer get a shoeing! -- The Laird |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TfL To Remove Roadside Ticket Machines For Buses | London Transport | |||
"Oyster Card barrier blunders cost passengers £60m a year" | London Transport | |||
Oyster Helpline Cost | London Transport | |||
Legal threats remove news reports from Unofficial Tramlink site | London Transport | |||
Cash Machines Heathrow #3 | London Transport |