Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 7, 12:53 am, wrote:
On May 6, 2:39 pm, Boltar wrote: On May 6, 12:47 pm, wrote: The advantage of people paying by oyster isn't just reduced costs. It's also faster journey times. It used to take forever for a long queue to board a bus, when many people were paying cash. Now that paying cash is significantly more expensive, hardly anyone does. So make it exact money only then. Problem solved. Works in loads of other places in the country. Besides which regular commuters will have an oyster card anyway because its more convenient if you travel every day so why nobble occasional commuters? B2003 Exact money still quite a lot slower than oyster. People fiddle about opening their wallet, a ticket has to be dispensed. That happens anyway on the tube when people top up their oyster cards. As for the buses yes it could slow things down a little but I think its a fair trade off. Also, if the rule were exact money only, then some people might find that annoying as well, on occasions when they were caught short of change... Well there could always be a rule of exact money or more if they only have a 2 pound coin for a 1 pound journey, The choice would then be theres as to whether to travel or find a shop and get some change. The problem with this country is its always the stick approach , never the carrot. Instead of "we'll penalise you if you pay by cash" it should be "if you use Oyster X times in a month you'll get a free 5 pound top-up" or something like that. But no , that would be far too civilised. B2003 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 7, 9:10 am, Boltar wrote:
The problem with this country is its always the stick approach , never the carrot. Instead of "we'll penalise you if you pay by cash" it should be "if you use Oyster X times in a month you'll get a free 5 pound top-up" or something like that. But no , that would be far too civilised. The point is, given that fares are set with the aim of getting a specific level of farebox revenue, those two things are *exactly the ****ing same*. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 7, 9:19 am, John B wrote:
On May 7, 9:10 am, Boltar wrote: The problem with this country is its always the stick approach , never the carrot. Instead of "we'll penalise you if you pay by cash" it should be "if you use Oyster X times in a month you'll get a free 5 pound top-up" or something like that. But no , that would be far too civilised. The point is, given that fares are set with the aim of getting a specific level of farebox revenue, those two things are *exactly the ****ing same*. Right , that would be why this sort of incentive is used with store cards , because getting a discount if you spend X amount is "exactly the f*cking same" as telling people to use our store card because otherwise we'll charge you twice the price. Oh , and thats after you'd paid 3 quid for the priviledge of buying said card (though I think that might have been waived now, not sure). They may well have reduced the Oyster fares initially a small amount , but those reductions have long since vanished and since then the cash fare on the buses have become extortionate and now its a minimum 4 quid to go anywhere on the tube! B2003 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 7, 9:35 am, Boltar wrote:
The problem with this country is its always the stick approach , never the carrot. Instead of "we'll penalise you if you pay by cash" it should be "if you use Oyster X times in a month you'll get a free 5 pound top-up" or something like that. But no , that would be far too civilised. The point is, given that fares are set with the aim of getting a specific level of farebox revenue, those two things are *exactly the ****ing same*. Right , that would be why this sort of incentive is used with store cards , because getting a discount if you spend X amount is "exactly the f*cking same" as telling people to use our store card because otherwise we'll charge you twice the price. With store cards: 1) of course they jack the price up for non-cardholders. What, you think Tesco is a charity now? 2) the card data allows them to do targeted promotions. Not so important for TfL ("we see you enjoy travelling from Highgate to Moorgate. Why not try Notting Hill Gate and Southgate?") -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 7, 9:50 am, John B wrote:
With store cards: 1) of course they jack the price up for non-cardholders. What, you think Tesco is a charity now? AFAIK you don't get anything any cheaper when you buy with these cards apart from the odd promotional item. No doubt you can collect points or whatever , but god help you if you don't cough up on time because the interest rates will nail you. 2) the card data allows them to do targeted promotions. Not so important for TfL ("we see you enjoy travelling from Highgate to Moorgate. Why not try Notting Hill Gate and Southgate?") ![]() Wouldn't put it past them at some point to use that info for non transport purposes though , depending on the data protection act (though thats never stopped reams of companies flogging our personal data in the past). Maybe if you always travel to a station with a new supermarket or something opening near by, you might get a promotional leaftlet through your door one day , who knows. B2003 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TfL To Remove Roadside Ticket Machines For Buses | London Transport | |||
"Oyster Card barrier blunders cost passengers £60m a year" | London Transport | |||
Oyster Helpline Cost | London Transport | |||
Legal threats remove news reports from Unofficial Tramlink site | London Transport | |||
Cash Machines Heathrow #3 | London Transport |