Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom Anderson" wrote in message
h.li On Thu, 8 May 2008, Recliner wrote: "Tom Anderson" wrote in message h.li On Thu, 8 May 2008, Paul Scott wrote: "Recliner" wrote in message ... Isn't there a plan for another new underground station associated with the development? Yes, on the Central line. I was under the impression that this was going to be a new set of platforms for Park Royal station (on the Piccadilly), but it seems it's far enough away that it'll be a separate station. That the distance between them is so large, attentive utl readers will recall, is because the Central line here goes up a slope, and platforms on slopes are no longer allowed. Actually, I think the "problem" is that the Picc is on a slight (imperceptible) slope. To move the platforms north wouldn't change the slope, but it wouldn't be allowed to build new platforms on a slope, even though it would be no worse than the current platforms. So no-one would be hurt by such a reconstruction, and anyone changing between the Picc and Central lines would be helped, but it still wouldn't be allowed. I stand corrected, thanks. This really is a stupid situation. Are the new Central platforms in the right place for a good interchange should the Piccadilly platforms be moved in the broad, sunlit uplands of some enlightened future? I'm not sure if this link will work, but try clicking on it and then click on the Bird's eye tab (and close the pane on the left). http://maps.live.com/?v=2&sp=Point.skn5q2gz8nxp_Park%20Royal____&encTyp e=1 With a bit of luck you'll see a southbound Picc train that's just entering what would be the new platform (perhaps shown with a push pin), having just crossed over the Central line. The station building is on the south side of the A40, with the platforms further to the south, with a northbound Picc train standing in the station. The idea is that the new platforms would be under the road bridge, to the north of the station building and overbridge. Passengers for the Picc will have no further to walk from the station entrance, though those for the Central line will inevitably have a longer walk. I assume the new Central line platforms would be a little to the east of the bridge under the Picc, under the new road and foot bridges. I assume that there would be a connection to the new Picc platforms, as well as a new station entrance on Coronation Road to the north (near to the new Diageo HQ building). Incidentally, the building seen under construction in the picture is now finished. If you scroll to the top right, you can see the site of the former Guinness brewery. You can also see the trackbed of the former rail connection |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recliner wrote:
"Tom Anderson" wrote in message h.li Are the new Central platforms in the right place for a good interchange should the Piccadilly platforms be moved in the broad, sunlit uplands of some enlightened future? No. I'm not sure if this link will work, but try clicking on it and then click on the Bird's eye tab (and close the pane on the left). http://maps.live.com/?v=2&sp=Point.skn5q2gz8nxp_Park%20Royal____&encTyp e=1 I assume the new Central line platforms would be a little to the east of the bridge under the Picc, under the new road and foot bridges. No, they will be east of the footbridge, unless the plan has changed in the last few years. There's a map here... http://www.alwaystouchout.com/project/33 The situation in 2001 is described here... http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...PkRoyalCentral I'll believe these platforms when they start building them. The planning consent for the office park included the condition that the station would open before the third (of eight) office blocks opened. What's the status of the office blocks? |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Rowland" wrote in
message Recliner wrote: "Tom Anderson" wrote in message h.li Are the new Central platforms in the right place for a good interchange should the Piccadilly platforms be moved in the broad, sunlit uplands of some enlightened future? No. That's a pity -- it doesn't look like it would be particularly difficult to create a decent interchange station, which would make travel around west London more convenient. I'm not sure if this link will work, but try clicking on it and then click on the Bird's eye tab (and close the pane on the left). http://maps.live.com/?v=2&sp=Point.skn5q2gz8nxp_Park%20Royal____&encTyp e=1 I assume the new Central line platforms would be a little to the east of the bridge under the Picc, under the new road and foot bridges. No, they will be east of the footbridge, unless the plan has changed in the last few years. There's a map here... http://www.alwaystouchout.com/project/33 The situation in 2001 is described here... http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...PkRoyalCentral I'll believe these platforms when they start building them. The planning consent for the office park included the condition that the station would open before the third (of eight) office blocks opened. What's the status of the office blocks? The second building looks complete, but doesn't yet seem to be occupied, nor to have any company sign on it. I suppose they may weel still be working on the interior fittings. I've not yet noticed any sign of the third building, so I suppose they could still meet the deadline of getting the station done before opening the third building. But I've not noticed any work starting on it yet either, nor on the Picc line platforms, assuming they do intend there to be a connection, even if it's not a convenient one. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recliner wrote:
"John Rowland" wrote in message I'll believe these platforms when they start building them. The planning consent for the office park included the condition that the station would open before the third (of eight) office blocks opened. What's the status of the office blocks? The second building looks complete, but doesn't yet seem to be occupied, nor to have any company sign on it. I suppose they may weel still be working on the interior fittings. I've not yet noticed any sign of the third building, so I suppose they could still meet the deadline of getting the station done before opening the third building. But I've not noticed any work starting on it yet either, nor on the Picc line platforms, assuming they do intend there to be a connection, even if it's not a convenient one. Someone who ought to know what they are talking about suggested that the developers never intended more than two blocks... that the planning request for eight blocks with station before the third was a con. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 May 2008, Recliner wrote:
"John Rowland" wrote in message Recliner wrote: "Tom Anderson" wrote in message h.li Are the new Central platforms in the right place for a good interchange should the Piccadilly platforms be moved in the broad, sunlit uplands of some enlightened future? No. That's a pity -- it doesn't look like it would be particularly difficult to create a decent interchange station, which would make travel around west London more convenient. An even better idea - he said, putting on his network editing loony hat - would be to build a junction there, so that trains from Uxbridge could join the Central line and head straight on into central London, without taking their passengers on a round-the houses trip of the west as the Picc does at the moment. You'd have to delete the Ealing Broadway branch of the Central for this to be plausible, which means it would only be doable after Crossrail, which is a pretty effective replacement for that little branch. You could then run more Picc trains to Heathrow, or transfer one of the District branches to it to reduce congestion on that line, as has been mooted (with the Central as the recipient) in the past. North Ealing station would no longer be served, but the only other station on the removed segment, Ealing Common, would still have District trains. You could even run Park Royal - Acton Town as a shuttle. [removes hat] tom -- I DO IT WRONG!!! |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Rowland" wrote in
message Recliner wrote: "John Rowland" wrote in message I'll believe these platforms when they start building them. The planning consent for the office park included the condition that the station would open before the third (of eight) office blocks opened. What's the status of the office blocks? The second building looks complete, but doesn't yet seem to be occupied, nor to have any company sign on it. I suppose they may weel still be working on the interior fittings. I've not yet noticed any sign of the third building, so I suppose they could still meet the deadline of getting the station done before opening the third building. But I've not noticed any work starting on it yet either, nor on the Picc line platforms, assuming they do intend there to be a connection, even if it's not a convenient one. Someone who ought to know what they are talking about suggested that the developers never intended more than two blocks... that the planning request for eight blocks with station before the third was a con. I doubt that -- they've flattened the old brewery site, and I can't imagine that they don't intend to build on it. The completed buildings only occupy a small part of a very large plot. By the time they've finished, the Park Royal site could rival Stockley Park (also badly served by public transport). |