Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 8, 9:45 am, chunky munky wrote:
Sounds like the spur to the Guinness brewery Has it closed or does it all go by road now? B2003 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boltar wrote:
On May 8, 9:45 am, chunky munky wrote: Sounds like the spur to the Guinness brewery Has it closed or does it all go by road now? Closed. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3628941.stm ESB |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Boltar" wrote in message
On May 8, 9:45 am, chunky munky wrote: Sounds like the spur to the Guinness brewery Has it closed or does it all go by road now? I think the rail connection was disused well before the brewery closed. The brewery was soon demolished and the area is now turning into an office park, with an increasing need for public transport (given that the North Circular and A40 are very slow moving in the mornings). |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Recliner" wrote in message ... "Boltar" wrote in message On May 8, 9:45 am, chunky munky wrote: Sounds like the spur to the Guinness brewery Has it closed or does it all go by road now? I think the rail connection was disused well before the brewery closed. The brewery was soon demolished and the area is now turning into an office park, with an increasing need for public transport (given that the North Circular and A40 are very slow moving in the mornings). Isn't there a plan for another new underground station associated with the development? Paul S |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Paul Scott wrote:
"Recliner" wrote in message ... "Boltar" wrote in message On May 8, 9:45 am, chunky munky wrote: Sounds like the spur to the Guinness brewery Has it closed or does it all go by road now? I think the rail connection was disused well before the brewery closed. The brewery was soon demolished and the area is now turning into an office park, with an increasing need for public transport (given that the North Circular and A40 are very slow moving in the mornings). Isn't there a plan for another new underground station associated with the development? Yes, on the Central line. I was under the impression that this was going to be a new set of platforms for Park Royal station (on the Piccadilly), but it seems it's far enough away that it'll be a separate station. That the distance between them is so large, attentive utl readers will recall, is because the Central line here goes up a slope, and platforms on slopes are no longer allowed. tom -- Got a revolution behind my eyes - We got to get up and organise |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom Anderson" wrote in message
h.li On Thu, 8 May 2008, Paul Scott wrote: "Recliner" wrote in message ... "Boltar" wrote in message On May 8, 9:45 am, chunky munky wrote: Sounds like the spur to the Guinness brewery Has it closed or does it all go by road now? I think the rail connection was disused well before the brewery closed. The brewery was soon demolished and the area is now turning into an office park, with an increasing need for public transport (given that the North Circular and A40 are very slow moving in the mornings). Isn't there a plan for another new underground station associated with the development? Yes, on the Central line. I was under the impression that this was going to be a new set of platforms for Park Royal station (on the Piccadilly), but it seems it's far enough away that it'll be a separate station. That the distance between them is so large, attentive utl readers will recall, is because the Central line here goes up a slope, and platforms on slopes are no longer allowed. Actually, I think the "problem" is that the Picc is on a slight (imperceptible) slope. To move the platforms north wouldn't change the slope, but it wouldn't be allowed to build new platforms on a slope, even though it would be no worse than the current platforms. So no-one would be hurt by such a reconstruction, and anyone changing between the Picc and Central lines would be helped, but it still wouldn't be allowed. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Recliner wrote:
"Tom Anderson" wrote in message h.li On Thu, 8 May 2008, Paul Scott wrote: "Recliner" wrote in message ... "Boltar" wrote in message On May 8, 9:45 am, chunky munky wrote: Sounds like the spur to the Guinness brewery Has it closed or does it all go by road now? I think the rail connection was disused well before the brewery closed. The brewery was soon demolished and the area is now turning into an office park, with an increasing need for public transport (given that the North Circular and A40 are very slow moving in the mornings). Isn't there a plan for another new underground station associated with the development? Yes, on the Central line. I was under the impression that this was going to be a new set of platforms for Park Royal station (on the Piccadilly), but it seems it's far enough away that it'll be a separate station. That the distance between them is so large, attentive utl readers will recall, is because the Central line here goes up a slope, and platforms on slopes are no longer allowed. Actually, I think the "problem" is that the Picc is on a slight (imperceptible) slope. To move the platforms north wouldn't change the slope, but it wouldn't be allowed to build new platforms on a slope, even though it would be no worse than the current platforms. So no-one would be hurt by such a reconstruction, and anyone changing between the Picc and Central lines would be helped, but it still wouldn't be allowed. I stand corrected, thanks. This really is a stupid situation. Are the new Central platforms in the right place for a good interchange should the Piccadilly platforms be moved in the broad, sunlit uplands of some enlightened future? tom -- For the first few years I ate lunch with he mathematicians. I soon found that they were more interested in fun and games than in serious work, so I shifted to eating with the physics table. There I stayed for a number of years until the Nobel Prize, promotions, and offers from other companies, removed most of the interesting people. So I shifted to the corresponding chemistry table where I had a friend. At first I asked what were the important problems in chemistry, then what important problems they were working on, or problems that might lead to important results. One day I asked, "if what they were working on was not important, and was not likely to lead to important things, they why were they working on them?" After that I had to eat with the engineers! -- R. W. Hamming |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom Anderson" wrote in message
h.li On Thu, 8 May 2008, Recliner wrote: "Tom Anderson" wrote in message h.li On Thu, 8 May 2008, Paul Scott wrote: "Recliner" wrote in message ... Isn't there a plan for another new underground station associated with the development? Yes, on the Central line. I was under the impression that this was going to be a new set of platforms for Park Royal station (on the Piccadilly), but it seems it's far enough away that it'll be a separate station. That the distance between them is so large, attentive utl readers will recall, is because the Central line here goes up a slope, and platforms on slopes are no longer allowed. Actually, I think the "problem" is that the Picc is on a slight (imperceptible) slope. To move the platforms north wouldn't change the slope, but it wouldn't be allowed to build new platforms on a slope, even though it would be no worse than the current platforms. So no-one would be hurt by such a reconstruction, and anyone changing between the Picc and Central lines would be helped, but it still wouldn't be allowed. I stand corrected, thanks. This really is a stupid situation. Are the new Central platforms in the right place for a good interchange should the Piccadilly platforms be moved in the broad, sunlit uplands of some enlightened future? I'm not sure if this link will work, but try clicking on it and then click on the Bird's eye tab (and close the pane on the left). http://maps.live.com/?v=2&sp=Point.skn5q2gz8nxp_Park%20Royal____&encTyp e=1 With a bit of luck you'll see a southbound Picc train that's just entering what would be the new platform (perhaps shown with a push pin), having just crossed over the Central line. The station building is on the south side of the A40, with the platforms further to the south, with a northbound Picc train standing in the station. The idea is that the new platforms would be under the road bridge, to the north of the station building and overbridge. Passengers for the Picc will have no further to walk from the station entrance, though those for the Central line will inevitably have a longer walk. I assume the new Central line platforms would be a little to the east of the bridge under the Picc, under the new road and foot bridges. I assume that there would be a connection to the new Picc platforms, as well as a new station entrance on Coronation Road to the north (near to the new Diageo HQ building). Incidentally, the building seen under construction in the picture is now finished. If you scroll to the top right, you can see the site of the former Guinness brewery. You can also see the trackbed of the former rail connection |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 8, 2:51 pm, "Recliner" wrote:
I think the rail connection was disused well before the brewery closed. The brewery was soon demolished and the area is now turning into an office park, with an increasing need for public transport (given that I wonder of Google will ever implement a historic Google Maps or Google Earth, so you could flick through images of areas such as this of say 1,2,5 or 10 years ago and see how they changed. I think it would be quite fascinating. I suppose the only way you could do it at the moment is screen grab whatever its showing at the time and saving the images for posterity. B2003 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|