Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 May 2008 20:14:58 +0100, "Bevan Price"
meVIAfreeukFULLSTOPcom wrote: "Tom Barry" wrote in message ... My gut feeling is that the bendies will be put out to pasture when their natural life is up, which may be from about 2012 onwards (I'm assuming average bus life in London as being about ten years, but bendies serving intensive routes may tire faster Or more likely, London rejects will be inflicted on places like Leeds, Glasgow, Manchester, etc., as has happened with double deckers when Ken & successor decide they are too old for London. Very unlikely as none of them are owned by the big groups so they won't cascade via that route. They are all leased and may end up almost anywhere but given the three door layout it's most probable they'll end up doing airport transfers or similar. If they can be converted to two door then they may have more utility for other UK operators. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Corfield wrote:
Very unlikely as none of them are owned by the big groups so they won't cascade via that route. They are all leased and may end up almost anywhere but given the three door layout it's most probable they'll end up doing airport transfers or similar. If they can be converted to two door then they may have more utility for other UK operators. Hmm, good point. The leasing companies will presumably expect to be compensated if you want to hand them back early, unless they've been remiss with the contracts (particularly given that right-hand-drive Citaro Gs aren't in huge demand, so finding an alternative user is problematic). Therefore you have the possibility of a Mayor elected on a platform of better financial control spending money to return a leased bus fleet early and then spending more money replacing it with more labour-intensive hardware that costs more to run, purely because of his personal antipathy to the design. Have I missed anything? Obviously it would be nice to know who's signed up to what (TfL presumably signed something saying we'll have x number of buses for y years at z pounds/year but the details may be important) but I doubt anyone will tell us. Tom |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 May 2008 23:21:39 +0100, Tom Barry
wrote: Paul Corfield wrote: Very unlikely as none of them are owned by the big groups so they won't cascade via that route. They are all leased and may end up almost anywhere but given the three door layout it's most probable they'll end up doing airport transfers or similar. If they can be converted to two door then they may have more utility for other UK operators. Hmm, good point. The leasing companies will presumably expect to be compensated if you want to hand them back early, unless they've been remiss with the contracts (particularly given that right-hand-drive Citaro Gs aren't in huge demand, so finding an alternative user is problematic). Therefore you have the possibility of a Mayor elected on a platform of better financial control spending money to return a leased bus fleet early and then spending more money replacing it with more labour-intensive hardware that costs more to run, purely because of his personal antipathy to the design. I doubt the leasing companies will have missed a trick. Some of the spare ex Selkent bendies are going to Arriva to bolster some North London routes and I think some others are going to the 25 (not 100% sure on that). Others have gone back to Dawson Rentals. The acid test will be what the hell happens to the retendering of the Red Arrows - they are out to tender now but the new contract starts in a year's time. Artics make a lot of sense on those routes given the heavy peak flows. I personally can't see them being replaced by deckers so we'd be back to rigid single decks but needing more of them than currently. I don't see how that is value for money. I don't think there is any real financial logic to the Boris Bus Plans but then there is no logic to the policy at all given, as you say, it is based on personal antipathy. This is the worst basis on which to make policy. Have I missed anything? Obviously it would be nice to know who's signed up to what (TfL presumably signed something saying we'll have x number of buses for y years at z pounds/year but the details may be important) but I doubt anyone will tell us. I have never seen anything published that shows vehicle leasing costs or who the contracts are with. The operators sort out the vehicles but have to comply with TfL's general specs as well as the specific contract terms for each route. TfL simply pay a performance adjusted contract fee - the annualised cost per route is typically shown on the bus tender awards page. However costs can become "murky" if a group discount tender is awarded where the operator offers a lower price if it wins several routes in one tranche. I doubt FOI would work either as commercial confidentiality certainly applies to the monetary amounts in what is a competitive tendering process. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 20:38:53 on
Sat, 17 May 2008, Paul Corfield remarked: They are all leased and may end up almost anywhere but given the three door layout Why can't one set of doors simply be disabled? -- Roland Perry |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote in message news ![]() In message , at 20:38:53 on Sat, 17 May 2008, Paul Corfield remarked: They are all leased and may end up almost anywhere but given the three door layout Why can't one set of doors simply be disabled? -- Roland Perry I've often wondered if drivers can separately control each set of doors on bendibusses. It seems that they can control the front door separately, while the rear two always work in sync. Why also have they put in a delay between when passengers push the stop button and the bell actually ringing? Earlier, as soon as you pushed the button, the bell would immediately ring. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 18 May 2008 10:51:43 +0100, Roland Perry
wrote: In message , at 20:38:53 on Sat, 17 May 2008, Paul Corfield remarked: They are all leased and may end up almost anywhere but given the three door layout Why can't one set of doors simply be disabled? Or even plated over. That's what happened to most deckers and the likes that have gone from London to elsewhere - replace the panel, add 2 rows of seats. That said, provincial bus operators don't like extra doors because of fare-dodging. If they have to have the one on the artic section (which I think they do), a middle set won't be any more of a problem. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 10:49:02 on Sun,
18 May 2008, Neil Williams remarked: That said, provincial bus operators don't like extra doors because of fare-dodging. If they have to have the one on the artic section (which I think they do), a middle set won't be any more of a problem. Nottingham's bendy buses seem to have one door at the front and a second one in the back section just behind the "concertina". They are far enough apart that when pulled up to a normal bus stop (which are usually arranged so the queue starts at the front of the bus and then grows away so the driver can see the whole queue ahead of him) you wouldn't expect any of the people in the queue to be running to the back to get on. -- Roland Perry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bus noise (and why I too like bendy buses) | London Transport | |||
How bendy is a bendy bus? | London Transport | |||
Last Routemasters on the 14 and 22 | London Transport | |||
Bendy bus fire | London Transport |