Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 30, 12:23*pm, Mr Mappy wrote:
I noticed that there was a piece in Rail magazine proposing the renaming of London Liverpool Street to London Broadgate*. I suggested this last year in a letter published in Rail**, but maybe it's not an original idea, anyone know of any earlier proposals to lose that confusing Liverpool Street? Eminently sensible. The old fashioned railway parlance of using the suffix 'junction' should be reviewed. For example, the inappropriate Watford Junction, St Helens Junction and Yeovil Junctions would be more helpful as Watford Mainline, St Helens South and Yeovil South. And the yet to open Dalston Junction (not a junction at all) would be better as Dalston Lane. Watfor IS a junction. Everyone knows it as Watford Junction. It will be even more so if the Met. ever makes it there. Some are just wrong - Euston Square on the Met isn't on Euston Square (this is in front of Euston mainline station). This would be better as Euston Road. How about just rebuiding Euston Square in front of Euston and making it into a proper interchange. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:02:33 -0700 (PDT), 1506
wrote: On May 30, 12:23*pm, Mr Mappy wrote: I noticed that there was a piece in Rail magazine proposing the renaming of London Liverpool Street to London Broadgate*. I suggested this last year in a letter published in Rail**, but maybe it's not an original idea, anyone know of any earlier proposals to lose that confusing Liverpool Street? Eminently sensible. Oh? What about :- Oxford Street (not in Oxford) Victoria (not in Australia) Kings Cross (ditto) Waterloo (not in Belgium) XXXXXX Road (usually not in XXXXXX) Dozens of Underground stations not in the place of the same name. Anyway, there's already a Broadgate in Oldham (and Nottingham and Lincoln and ...) so by your own reasoning that name can't be used for a London station. snip |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:02:33 -0700 (PDT), 1506
wrote: How about just rebuiding Euston Square in front of Euston and making it into a proper interchange. If I'm getting my bearings right, the entrance is all that would need rebuilding - the other end of the platforms are damn near Euston station compared with where the entrance currently is. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 23:07:35 on
Fri, 30 May 2008, Charles Ellson remarked: Anyway, there's already a Broadgate in Oldham (and Nottingham and Lincoln and ...) Broadgate in Nottingham is a small street in Beeston miles from anywhere you'd expect a railway station. You didn't mean Broadmarsh, did you (always reminds me of a cross between Broadmoor and Belmarsh). -- Roland Perry |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 31, 8:46 am, (Neil Williams)
wrote: How about just rebuiding Euston Square in front of Euston and making it into a proper interchange. If I'm getting my bearings right, the entrance is all that would need rebuilding - the other end of the platforms are damn near Euston station compared with where the entrance currently is. Yep - its a blindingly obvious thing to do. -- Nick |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 31 May 2008 13:17:58 +0100, Roland Perry
wrote: In message , at 23:07:35 on Fri, 30 May 2008, Charles Ellson remarked: Anyway, there's already a Broadgate in Oldham (and Nottingham and Lincoln and ...) Broadgate in Nottingham is a small street in Beeston miles from anywhere you'd expect a railway station. You didn't mean Broadmarsh, did you (always reminds me of a cross between Broadmoor and Belmarsh). As a steet, I'd picked it as a (probably) more established use of the name Broadgate than a "here today, gone tomorrow" [(c) Robin Day] office development. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 23:05:53 on
Sat, 31 May 2008, Charles Ellson remarked: Broadgate in Nottingham is a small street in Beeston miles from anywhere you'd expect a railway station. You didn't mean Broadmarsh, did you (always reminds me of a cross between Broadmoor and Belmarsh). As a steet, I'd picked it as a (probably) more established use of the name Broadgate than a "here today, gone tomorrow" [(c) Robin Day] office development. But Broadgate in Nottingham is miles from a railway station, so why use it as a name? -- Roland Perry |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 May 2008, 1506 wrote:
On May 30, 12:23*pm, Mr Mappy wrote: I noticed that there was a piece in Rail magazine proposing the renaming of London Liverpool Street to London Broadgate*. I suggested this last year in a letter published in Rail**, but maybe it's not an original idea, anyone know of any earlier proposals to lose that confusing Liverpool Street? Eminently sensible. Are we sure it isn't London Bishopsgate? That would be a much better name. Or, hey, how about Broad Street? tom -- I do not think we will have to wait for long. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 10:12:40 +0100, Roland Perry
wrote: In message , at 23:05:53 on Sat, 31 May 2008, Charles Ellson remarked: Broadgate in Nottingham is a small street in Beeston miles from anywhere you'd expect a railway station. You didn't mean Broadmarsh, did you (always reminds me of a cross between Broadmoor and Belmarsh). As a steet, I'd picked it as a (probably) more established use of the name Broadgate than a "here today, gone tomorrow" [(c) Robin Day] office development. But Broadgate in Nottingham is miles from a railway station, so why use it as a name? The point is that there are probably many stations somewhat closer to a relatively-permanent "Broadgate" than Liverpool Street station is. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 31 May, 20:08, D7666 wrote: On May 31, 8:46 am, (Neil Williams) wrote: How about just rebuiding Euston Square in front of Euston and making it into a proper interchange. If I'm getting my bearings right, the entrance is all that would need rebuilding - the other end of the platforms are damn near Euston station compared with where the entrance currently is. Yep - its a blindingly obvious thing to do. But not perhaps as blindingly simple as one might like it to be! There were some recent murmurs of a significant redevelopment at Euston, replete with an air rights development in place of the parcel deck, and I'm sure I recall some vague notion that this would also entail linking up Euston Square with Euston. In the meantime Euston Square is a useful is a little secret for those in the know, far from the madding crowd. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Box Signal Box and Junction Road Junction | London Transport | |||
Photos/details of Heathrow Junction station | London Transport | |||
New DLR station, and old Thames Tunnel | London Transport | |||
London Regional Metro eastern portal and junction | London Transport | |||
I've been to London for business meetings and told myself that I'd be back to see London for myself. (rather than flying one day and out the next) I've used the tube briefly and my questions a | London Transport |