Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
I have recently found several roads which have dead-end signs at both ends but are not dead ends at all. For instance in North Pinner, Barrow Point Avenue/Lane has dead end signs at the junctions with Avenue Road and Oakhill Avenue, but the road between them is a through road. The condition and age of the tarmac suggest that if a barrier has been removed, it has not happened recently. This road is not a useful shortcut for any journey that doesn't start or end within a few yards of it, so it is hard to know what purpose the deceiving signs could serve. I would also like to know whether there are any councillors living on it, since it seems to be the roads which contain a councillor or two which are generally deemed to be too precious to be used by the Hoi Poloi. In the long term a policy of deceptive road signs will be counter productive, because people will stop trusting them. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 22:16:20 +0100, "John Rowland"
wrote: Hi all, I have recently found several roads which have dead-end signs at both ends but are not dead ends at all. For instance in North Pinner, Barrow Point Avenue/Lane has dead end signs at the junctions with Avenue Road and Oakhill Avenue, but the road between them is a through road. The condition and age of the tarmac suggest that if a barrier has been removed, it has not happened recently. [snip] How old are the "no through road" signs? Rob. -- rob at robertwoolley dot co dot uk |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert Woolley" wrote in message
... On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 22:16:20 +0100, "John Rowland" wrote: Hi all, I have recently found several roads which have dead-end signs at both ends but are not dead ends at all. For instance in North Pinner, Barrow Point Avenue/Lane How old are the "no through road" signs? I don't think they were new, in this case. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 23:10:53 +0100, "John Rowland"
wrote: "Robert Woolley" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 22:16:20 +0100, "John Rowland" wrote: Hi all, I have recently found several roads which have dead-end signs at both ends but are not dead ends at all. For instance in North Pinner, Barrow Point Avenue/Lane How old are the "no through road" signs? I don't think they were new, in this case. The reason I ask, is whether at _some stage_ the roads were dead ends. In the event of cock-up or conspiracy, start with the presumption of cock-up..... Rob. -- rob at robertwoolley dot co dot uk |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
I have recently found several roads which have dead-end signs at both ends but are not dead ends at all. For instance in North Pinner, Barrow Point Avenue/Lane How old are the "no through road" signs? I don't think they were new, in this case. The reason I ask, is whether at _some stage_ the roads were dead ends. In the event of cock-up or conspiracy, start with the presumption of cock-up..... Rob. There used to be a similar sign in Beechwood Avenue, N3, and Bartholomew shows it on their map as a no-through-road but in fact you can use it to reach the North Circular (NE-bound only) and is useful when there is too much traffic turning right from Finchley Road (A598) because you can go straight ahead and turn right into Beechwood Avenue to reach the North Circular. I think there were originally plans to close off the link to the North Circular when the by-pass was still planned. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland wrote:
Hi all, I have recently found several roads which have dead-end signs at both ends but are not dead ends at all. For instance in North Pinner, Barrow Point Avenue/Lane has dead end signs at the junctions with Avenue Road and Oakhill Avenue, but the road between them is a through road. The condition and age of the tarmac suggest that if a barrier has been removed, it has not happened recently. This road is not a useful shortcut for any journey that doesn't start or end within a few yards of it, so it is hard to know what purpose the deceiving signs could serve. I would also like to know whether there are any councillors living on it, since it seems to be the roads which contain a councillor or two which are generally deemed to be too precious to be used by the Hoi Poloi. In the long term a policy of deceptive road signs will be counter productive, because people will stop trusting them. I live in such a road. On most maps (A-Z, Street Finder, etc.) it looks as though my road goes into the docks near Canary Wharf. In reality there is only a pedestrian access to Mill Harbour and the road goes through two 90 lefts and comes back on itself but vehicles were virtually queuing up to ask locals how to get into the Docks. The worst thing was that 40 foot trucks would get to the end, find no exit and were too long to get round the corners to get out so they would reverse the whole length of the road with a couple of inches to spare from the residents' cars either side. Several kids got injured and there were many more near misses! I wrote to the Council (Tower Hamlets) several times but got no reply so, when I had a chance to speak to the head of Highways at a public meeting, I suggested that they put up signs saying "No Access to Docklands". This was duly done but because the signs were only 2-foot square black on white nobody noticed them. After further consultation the Council finally put up proper 'No Through Road' signs and the problem was solved. The road isn't a rat-run as it just comes out near where it comes in but it does get busy with kids and adults going to the Leisure Centre/Swimming Pool opposite me and the extra traffic and reversing lorries had made it a nightmare. BTW I am *not* a councillor, just one of the peasants who found his voice and used it :-) -- Phil ,,,^.".^,,, --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 01/09/03 |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I live in such a road. On most maps (A-Z, Street Finder, etc.) it
looks as though my road goes into the docks near Canary Wharf. In reality there is only a pedestrian access to Mill Harbour and the road goes through two 90 lefts and comes back on itself but vehicles were virtually queuing up to ask locals how to get into the Docks. The worst thing was that 40 foot trucks would get to the end, find no exit and were too long to get round the corners to get out so they would reverse the whole length of the road with a couple of inches to spare from the residents' cars either side. Several kids got injured and there were many more near misses! I wrote to the Council (Tower Hamlets) several times but got no reply so, when I had a chance to speak to the head of Highways at a public meeting, I suggested that they put up signs saying "No Access to Docklands". This was duly done but because the signs were only 2-foot square black on white nobody noticed them. After further consultation the Council finally put up proper 'No Through Road' signs and the problem was solved. The road isn't a rat-run as it just comes out near where it comes in but it does get busy with kids and adults going to the Leisure Centre/Swimming Pool opposite me and the extra traffic and reversing lorries had made it a nightmare. BTW I am *not* a councillor, just one of the peasants who found his voice and used it :-) -- Phil ,,,^.".^,,, That seems to be the opposite - we are talking about roads that are shown as dead-ends but really are through roads. An example in Hampstead is Gayton Road off Hampstead High Street. It has a sign "environmental area, no through route" but in fact will take you through to Well Walk and East Heath Road where you can turn left and rejoin the A502 at Hampstead Pond. In fact you have many other chances to take this "rat-run", the first one being a right-turn into Parkhill Road then a forced left into Fleet Road which becomes South End Road and then East Heath Road. Be warned though - there can be long tailbacks down East Heath Road up to the pond (which is nowhere near Pond Street, by the way). |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
12 yr old boy ends up in sidings | London Transport | |||
These writhing whales of the road have swung their hefty rear ends round our corners for the final time. | London Transport | |||
Fake Chanel Hobo in Black Fake HandBags | London Transport | |||
Fake Coach Mia Satchel - Grey Fake HandBags | London Transport | |||
Fake dead ends | London Transport |