Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
HE Elsom wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:38:18 +0100, Chris Shore wrote: "Duncan Wood" wrote in message news ![]() Generally I can survive away from home for more than 24hrs without nail scissors & toothpaste is available in most of the world nowadays. Indeed. Buy solid deodorant, tooth powder and solid shaving soap. I got the "you are a terrorist" treatment with solid deodorant at Newquay in April. They were also sniffy about used bars of soap and solid shampoo, and a hoggs pudding (though they might have thought that that was a biological warfare risk). Regards, Helen Using an aeroplane to get to Newquay and back makes you little better than one in my eyes. What about taking a train? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:53:49 +0100, magwitch wrote:
Using an aeroplane to get to Newquay and back makes you little better than one in my eyes. What about taking a train? I have no money, the flight was free and it was important for me to see someone there. I hope that meets your moral standards. Regards, Helen -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:01:45 +0100, HE Elsom wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:53:49 +0100, magwitch wrote: Using an aeroplane to get to Newquay and back makes you little better than one in my eyes. What about taking a train? I have no money, the flight was free and it was important for me to see someone there. I hope that meets your moral standards. No. Now go and eat a bucket of organic free-range wholewheat tofu as penance. -- One way ticket from Mornington Crescent to Tannhauser Gate please. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
HE Elsom wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:53:49 +0100, magwitch wrote: Using an aeroplane to get to Newquay and back makes you little better than one in my eyes. What about taking a train? I have no money, the flight was free and it was important for me to see someone there. I hope that meets your moral standards. Regards, Helen Nothing to do with morality... what's this free airline called then? I know RyanAir were doing flights to Italy for £4 last summer, but your's sounds a better deal. PS. I've experienced having no money as well, we used to hitch. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
HE Elsom wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:53:49 +0100, magwitch wrote: Using an aeroplane to get to Newquay and back makes you little better than one in my eyes. What about taking a train? I have no money, the flight was free and it was important for me to see someone there. I hope that meets your moral standards. Look at it another way: the extra fuel burnt from the additional weight of you and your baggage, since the plane was going to fly that route anyway, was miniscule. You could probably offset it by growing a couple of rows of carrots. Not a point of view that's popular amongst eco-warriors, because it reduces them to "*grumble* Shouldn't have a plane on that route anyway *grumble, mumble*". Jon -- SPAM BLOCK IN USE! To reply in email, replace 'deadspam' with 'green-lines'. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Jul, 10:50, Jon Green wrote:
Using an aeroplane to get to Newquay and back makes you little better than one in my eyes. What about taking a train? I have no money, the flight was free and it was important for me to see someone there. I hope that meets your moral standards. Look at it another way: the extra fuel burnt from the additional weight of you and your baggage, since the plane was going to fly that route anyway, was miniscule. You could probably offset it by growing a couple of rows of carrots. Not a point of view that's popular amongst eco-warriors, because it reduces them to "*grumble* Shouldn't have a plane on that route anyway *grumble, mumble*". OTOH her fare could have made the difference for the airline between continuing the route and cancelling it as unprofitable. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John B wrote:
On 14 Jul, 10:50, Jon Green wrote: Not a point of view that's popular amongst eco-warriors, because it reduces them to "*grumble* Shouldn't have a plane on that route anyway *grumble, mumble*". OTOH her fare could have made the difference for the airline between continuing the route and cancelling it as unprofitable. Yeah, and mistimed butterfly-wing flappage over Brazil has caused plane crashes. The Newquay route is a nice little earner for Ryanair. They've expanded their service there since inception, due to popularity. If you want to understand why, try lugging a 8'6" mini-mal glass fibre board, in its carry-bag (plus a bag full of neoprene and clothes) around a few trains, and through the London Underground system betweentimes. If you find a way of getting the board undamaged down the escalators without causing distress and injury to fellow travellers, do let me know. Or, for a real laugh, take them on the bus instead. The East Runton (Norfolk) surf's OK on the occasional days when there's decent long-travel waves down the North Sea and no wind behind to flatten them, but if you want to surf where it's warm (I surf Runton in a 5mm suit even in summer!) and you can usually find surfable conditions _somewhere_, then the West Country's beaches are the usual choice, and the only practical ways to get there are car or plane. Given the joys of the A30 and A39, I'd say that the plane is probably the more green option, bizarrely enough. Not that Helen's was a surfing trip AFAICT, but all the same... Jon -- SPAM BLOCK IN USE! To reply in email, replace 'deadspam' with 'green-lines'. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jon Green wrote:
John B wrote: On 14 Jul, 10:50, Jon Green wrote: Not a point of view that's popular amongst eco-warriors, because it reduces them to "*grumble* Shouldn't have a plane on that route anyway *grumble, mumble*". OTOH her fare could have made the difference for the airline between continuing the route and cancelling it as unprofitable. Yeah, and mistimed butterfly-wing flappage over Brazil has caused plane crashes. The Newquay route is a nice little earner for Ryanair. They've expanded their service there since inception, due to popularity. If you want to understand why, try lugging a 8'6" mini-mal glass fibre board, in its carry-bag (plus a bag full of neoprene and clothes) around a few trains, and through the London Underground system betweentimes. If you find a way of getting the board undamaged down the escalators without causing distress and injury to fellow travellers, do let me know. Or, for a real laugh, take them on the bus instead. Actually my last time in Newquay was circa 1977 and I took a 3x4' Marshall amp and guitar case down there (play 3 chords and form a band) as well as our luggage on the train. I can't remember it being a major problem. In fact we chummed up with Bruce Foxton and his g/f from the Jam on the train en-route. The East Runton (Norfolk) surf's OK on the occasional days when there's decent long-travel waves down the North Sea and no wind behind to flatten them, but if you want to surf where it's warm (I surf Runton in a 5mm suit even in summer!) and you can usually find surfable conditions _somewhere_, then the West Country's beaches are the usual choice, and the only practical ways to get there are car or plane. Given the joys of the A30 and A39, I'd say that the plane is probably the more green option, bizarrely enough. You'd be wrong. Travelling in a group in a traditional surfers' combi surf boards strapped to the roof is the style, whatever Jemima and her friends bound for Rock for the hols might tell you. Not that Helen's was a surfing trip AFAICT, but all the same... Jon |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 14, 12:52 pm, Jon Green wrote:
Not a point of view that's popular amongst eco-warriors, because it reduces them to "*grumble* Shouldn't have a plane on that route anyway *grumble, mumble*". OTOH her fare could have made the difference for the airline between continuing the route and cancelling it as unprofitable. Yeah, and mistimed butterfly-wing flappage over Brazil has caused plane crashes. There is clearly a financial point where an airline decides whether to curtail, keep as-is, or expand a route. I imagine this is based on percentage margin; logically, there must be *some* individual fare that takes the margin over the border line. The Newquay route is a nice little earner for Ryanair. They've expanded their service there since inception, due to popularity. ....precisely. If you want to understand why, try lugging a 8'6" mini-mal glass fibre board, in its carry-bag (plus a bag full of neoprene and clothes) around a few trains, and through the London Underground system betweentimes. If you find a way of getting the board undamaged down the escalators without causing distress and injury to fellow travellers, do let me know. Or, for a real laugh, take them on the bus instead. Hmm. I've been to a few airports; I don't recall any of them being places I'd like to lug a surfboard around. If I had a surfboard to transport from the southeast/midlands to Cornwall, I'd go by car (presumably your hypothetical surfer has access to a car, since otherwise they'd have the same trouble with escalators, trains and buses in getting to the airport in the first place). Given the joys of the A30 and A39, I'd say that the plane is probably the more green option, bizarrely enough. Very sceptical that this could be the case even allowing for the poor fuel consumption you'd get on those roads, assuming you're not driving solo. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jon Green wrote:
HE Elsom wrote: On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:53:49 +0100, magwitch wrote: Using an aeroplane to get to Newquay and back makes you little better than one in my eyes. What about taking a train? I have no money, the flight was free and it was important for me to see someone there. I hope that meets your moral standards. Look at it another way: the extra fuel burnt from the additional weight of you and your baggage, since the plane was going to fly that route anyway, was miniscule. You could probably offset it by growing a couple of rows of carrots. Ever tried growing a couple of rows of carrots Jon? Not a point of view that's popular amongst eco-warriors, because it reduces them to "*grumble* Shouldn't have a plane on that route anyway *grumble, mumble*". Jon All I can say is that during the '50s '60s and '70s people managed to get to Devon or Cornwall for lovely holidays and the 4–6 hour car or train journey was all part of the fun. Just as the 5-day trip my college friend and I took down to Portugal to stay with some family friends there. 30 years later, I remember travelling through France and Spain in our clapped-out Hillman Frog-eye Sprite far better than the ensuing 4 week holiday in Portugal itself. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wafted from paradise to Luton Airport | London Transport | |||
Meeting place in Luton Airport | London Transport | |||
Luton airport - Central London (Bayswater) | London Transport | |||
Best Station for Luton Airport... | London Transport | |||
Luton Airport | London Transport |