Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew Robert Breen" wrote in message ... In article , Mr Thant wrote: On 15 Jul, 13:05, "Paul Scott" wrote: You've summed up the flawed thinking of the DfT quite well there. Please refer to the Thameslink Rolling Stock spec for other conflicting requirements: Roger Ford guesses a 200 hp diesel generator will need to be included under one of the carriages in each unit. It's not a terrible idea but I can't imagine a cost benefit analysis on it is positive - how often is the track navigable but the traction supply unavailable? Plus you['ve got to test the thing to make sure it's functional before the train goes out each day. Is it a critical failure if it doesn't start (which will do /wonders/ for train avaiablilty)? Personally, I rather liked UR's suggestion of a Spearfish power pack for the emergency self-propelling capability, but each use of a power-pack wouldn't be cheap ![]() Especially if they forget to specify they don't need a warhead... Paul |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wagn Rolling Stock | London Transport | |||
Wagn Rolling Stock | London Transport | |||
East London Line Rolling Stock Proposals | London Transport | |||
Rolling stock losses in the bombs | London Transport | |||
LUL rolling stock question | London Transport |