Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 29, 8:20 pm, "Batman55" wrote:
"Adrian" wrote in message ... gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: So - you reinforce the window pillars upstairs. A LOT. They're going to have to transmit the forces backwards, else they'll just bend again, so Probably a better idea would be reinforce the pillars so they bend but don't snap but make the place where they join the roof fairly weak so the roof effectively slides off over the top of them. The roof being shoved back dissappates the energy but the reinforced pillars stop it squashing the passengers. No, it'd just be uncontrolled then. Perhaps the driver should have a radar warning device like airline pilots "Pull up, Pull up"! That seems like a good idea to me. Just have some bleeper which gets more and more urgent and if the computer thinks the bus is going to strike the bridge then it slams on the breaks. The technology exists to do it. B2003 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another bus for Dalston Junction? | London Transport | |||
Another bus oddity: 812 | London Transport | |||
Shepherd's Bush on the Central Line - another platform? | London Transport | |||
Another Oyster Question | London Transport | |||
Another "Crapita" CC screw up | London Transport |